Should we reconsider how to assess eutrophication?

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY
L Polimene, O Parn, E Garcia-Gorriz, D Macias, A Stips, O Duteil, N Ferreira-Cordeiro, S Miladinova, C Piroddi, N Serpetti
{"title":"Should we reconsider how to assess eutrophication?","authors":"L Polimene,&nbsp;O Parn,&nbsp;E Garcia-Gorriz,&nbsp;D Macias,&nbsp;A Stips,&nbsp;O Duteil,&nbsp;N Ferreira-Cordeiro,&nbsp;S Miladinova,&nbsp;C Piroddi,&nbsp;N Serpetti","doi":"10.1093/plankt/fbad022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Eutrophication in marine waters is traditionally assessed by checking if nutrients, algal biomass and oxygen are below/above a given threshold. However, increased biomass, nutrient concentrations and oxygen demand do not lead to undesirable environmental effects if the flow of carbon/energy from primary producers toward high trophic levels is consistently preserved. Consequently, traditional indicators might provide a misleading assessment of the eutrophication risk. To avoid this, we propose to evaluate eutrophication by using a new index based on plankton trophic fluxes instead of biogeochemical concentrations. A preliminary, model-based, assessment suggests that this approach might give a substantially different picture of the eutrophication status of our seas, with potential consequences on marine ecosystem management. Given the difficulties to measure trophic fluxes in the field, the use of numerical simulations is recommended although the uncertainty associated with biogeochemical models inevitably affects the reliability of the index. However, given the effort currently in place to develop refined numerical tools describing the marine environment (Ocean Digital Twins), a reliable, model-based, eutrophication index could be operational in the near future.</p>","PeriodicalId":16800,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plankton Research","volume":"45 3","pages":"413-420"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10243849/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plankton Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/plankt/fbad022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MARINE & FRESHWATER BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Eutrophication in marine waters is traditionally assessed by checking if nutrients, algal biomass and oxygen are below/above a given threshold. However, increased biomass, nutrient concentrations and oxygen demand do not lead to undesirable environmental effects if the flow of carbon/energy from primary producers toward high trophic levels is consistently preserved. Consequently, traditional indicators might provide a misleading assessment of the eutrophication risk. To avoid this, we propose to evaluate eutrophication by using a new index based on plankton trophic fluxes instead of biogeochemical concentrations. A preliminary, model-based, assessment suggests that this approach might give a substantially different picture of the eutrophication status of our seas, with potential consequences on marine ecosystem management. Given the difficulties to measure trophic fluxes in the field, the use of numerical simulations is recommended although the uncertainty associated with biogeochemical models inevitably affects the reliability of the index. However, given the effort currently in place to develop refined numerical tools describing the marine environment (Ocean Digital Twins), a reliable, model-based, eutrophication index could be operational in the near future.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

我们是否应该重新考虑如何评估富营养化?
传统上,评估海水富营养化的方法是检查营养物、藻类生物量和氧气是否低于或高于给定阈值。然而,如果从初级生产者向高营养水平的碳/能量流动持续保持,生物量、养分浓度和需氧量的增加不会导致不良的环境影响。因此,传统指标可能对富营养化风险提供误导性评估。为了避免这种情况,我们建议采用一种基于浮游生物营养通量的新指标来代替生物地球化学浓度来评价富营养化。一项基于模型的初步评估表明,这种方法可能会给我们的海洋富营养化状况提供一个截然不同的图景,并对海洋生态系统管理产生潜在影响。考虑到在野外测量营养通量的困难,建议使用数值模拟,尽管与生物地球化学模型有关的不确定性不可避免地影响指数的可靠性。然而,鉴于目前正在努力开发描述海洋环境的精确数值工具(海洋数字双胞胎),一个可靠的、基于模型的富营养化指数可能在不久的将来投入使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Plankton Research
Journal of Plankton Research 生物-海洋学
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
65
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Plankton Research publishes innovative papers that significantly advance the field of plankton research, and in particular, our understanding of plankton dynamics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信