Contraceptive Continuation and Experiences Obtaining Implant and IUD Removal Among Women Randomized to Use Injectable Contraception, Levonorgestrel Implant, and Copper IUD in South Africa and Zambia.

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 DEMOGRAPHY
Alice F Cartwright, Rebecca L Callahan, Mags Beksinska, Margaret P Kasaro, Jennifer H Tang, Cecilia Milford, Christina Wong, Marissa Velarde, Virginia Maphumulo, Maria Fawzy, Manze Chinyama, Esther Chabu, Mayaba Mudenda, Jennifer Smit
{"title":"Contraceptive Continuation and Experiences Obtaining Implant and IUD Removal Among Women Randomized to Use Injectable Contraception, Levonorgestrel Implant, and Copper IUD in South Africa and Zambia.","authors":"Alice F Cartwright,&nbsp;Rebecca L Callahan,&nbsp;Mags Beksinska,&nbsp;Margaret P Kasaro,&nbsp;Jennifer H Tang,&nbsp;Cecilia Milford,&nbsp;Christina Wong,&nbsp;Marissa Velarde,&nbsp;Virginia Maphumulo,&nbsp;Maria Fawzy,&nbsp;Manze Chinyama,&nbsp;Esther Chabu,&nbsp;Mayaba Mudenda,&nbsp;Jennifer Smit","doi":"10.1111/sifp.12222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Few longitudinal studies have measured contraceptive continuation past one year in sub-Saharan Africa. We surveyed 674 women who had been randomized to receive the three-month intramuscular contraceptive injectable (DMPA-IM), levonorgestrel (LNG) implant, or copper intrauterine device (IUD) during the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) trial in South Africa and Zambia and were subsequently followed for two additional years to explore method continuation, reasons for discontinuation, and access to implant and IUD removal services. We also conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 39 participants. We estimated cumulative discontinuation probabilities using Kaplan-Meier estimates and assessed factors associated with discontinuation using Cox-proportional hazards models. The LNG implant continuation rate over the maximum 44-month study period was 60 percent, while rates for the copper IUD and DMPA-IM were 52 percent and 44 percent, respectively. Reasons for method discontinuation included side effects, particularly menstrual changes, and method stock-outs. Most implant and IUD users who sought removal were able to access services; however, room for improvement exists. In this cohort originally randomized to receive a contraceptive method and attend regular study visits, implants and IUDs continued to be highly acceptable over an additional two years, but facilities should continue to ensure that insertions and removals are available as requested.</p>","PeriodicalId":22069,"journal":{"name":"Studies in Family Planning","volume":"54 2","pages":"379-401"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10239327/pdf/nihms-1888891.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in Family Planning","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12222","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Few longitudinal studies have measured contraceptive continuation past one year in sub-Saharan Africa. We surveyed 674 women who had been randomized to receive the three-month intramuscular contraceptive injectable (DMPA-IM), levonorgestrel (LNG) implant, or copper intrauterine device (IUD) during the Evidence for Contraceptive Options and HIV Outcomes (ECHO) trial in South Africa and Zambia and were subsequently followed for two additional years to explore method continuation, reasons for discontinuation, and access to implant and IUD removal services. We also conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with 39 participants. We estimated cumulative discontinuation probabilities using Kaplan-Meier estimates and assessed factors associated with discontinuation using Cox-proportional hazards models. The LNG implant continuation rate over the maximum 44-month study period was 60 percent, while rates for the copper IUD and DMPA-IM were 52 percent and 44 percent, respectively. Reasons for method discontinuation included side effects, particularly menstrual changes, and method stock-outs. Most implant and IUD users who sought removal were able to access services; however, room for improvement exists. In this cohort originally randomized to receive a contraceptive method and attend regular study visits, implants and IUDs continued to be highly acceptable over an additional two years, but facilities should continue to ensure that insertions and removals are available as requested.

南非和赞比亚随机使用注射避孕药、左炔诺孕酮植入物和铜宫内节育器的妇女的避孕延续和获得植入物和取出宫内节育器的经验
在撒哈拉以南非洲,很少有纵向研究衡量避孕持续时间超过一年。我们调查了674名妇女,她们在南非和赞比亚的避孕选择和艾滋病毒结局的证据(ECHO)试验中随机接受了三个月的肌内避孕注射(DMPA-IM)、左炔诺孕酮(LNG)植入物或铜宫内节育器(IUD),随后又进行了两年的随访,以探讨方法的延续、停药的原因以及获得植入物和宫内节育器取出服务的情况。我们还对39名参与者进行了深入的定性访谈。我们使用Kaplan-Meier估计值估计累计停药概率,并使用cox比例风险模型评估与停药相关的因素。在长达44个月的研究期间,LNG植入物的持续率为60%,而铜宫内节育器和DMPA-IM的持续率分别为52%和44%。方法停用的原因包括副作用,特别是月经变化和方法缺货。大多数寻求摘除的植入物和宫内节育器使用者能够获得服务;然而,仍有改进的余地。在这个最初被随机分配接受避孕方法并参加定期研究访问的队列中,植入物和宫内节育器在另外两年中仍然是高度可接受的,但设施应继续确保按要求插入和取出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
9.50%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Studies in Family Planning publishes public health, social science, and biomedical research concerning sexual and reproductive health, fertility, and family planning, with a primary focus on developing countries. Each issue contains original research articles, reports, a commentary, book reviews, and a data section with findings for individual countries from the Demographic and Health Surveys.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信