Does the Nightmare of Distressing Complications of Groin Dissection Over with "River Flow" Incision? - Experience of 240 Dissections from Tertiary Referral Oncology Centre, India.

Q3 Medicine
The gulf journal of oncology Pub Date : 2023-05-01
M D Ray, J R Jeena Josephin, Premanand N
{"title":"Does the Nightmare of Distressing Complications of Groin Dissection Over with \"River Flow\" Incision? - Experience of 240 Dissections from Tertiary Referral Oncology Centre, India.","authors":"M D Ray,&nbsp;J R Jeena Josephin,&nbsp;Premanand N","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Groin dissection has been a nightmare for many surgeons due to its higher morbidity especially flap necrosis. Various modifications in incisions have been described in the literature to reduce the complications but with variable outcomes. By our novel \"River Flow\" incision technique, we have significantly reduced the procedure related complications without compromising onco surgical principles.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective longitudinal clinical observational study was designed after Institutional Ethical Committee clearance, aiming to minimize the rate of complications, especially flap necrosis. All patients who underwent unilateral/bilateral ilio-inguinal block dissection (IIBD) from January 2014 to December 2021 were included in the study. The \"River Flow\" incision was made and standard ilio-inguinal block dissection was performed. Flap viability, seroma formation, lymphedema, infection, etc. were observed and noted during hospitalization and on followup. Clavien- Dindo classification was used to grade the postoperative complications. We have taken our historical data of 235 groin dissections as a control and compared them with the results of the present study. It is one of the largest studies on groin dissection so far.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 138 patients underwent 240 groin dissections. The most common diagnosis was carcinoma penis (44.9%) followed by carcinoma vulva (22.4%). Overall, the outcome of all groin dissections showed no postoperative mortality. None of the patients had complete flap necrosis. But in our historical data, the flap necrosis rate was 38%. The most common complication observed was seroma formation in 13.7% of cases followed by surgical site infection (6.52%). All the complications were managed conservatively. The postoperative stay of the patients was also significantly less. The median hospital stay was 3 days.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>\"River Flow\" incision technique is a simple but effective novel surgical technique for therapeutic ILND for any surgical setup without the learning curve. It can avoid flap necrosis, and decrease morbidity significantly without compromising the onco surgical principle of standard groin dissection.</p><p><strong>Key words: </strong>Groin dissection, skin necrosis, river flow incision.</p>","PeriodicalId":53633,"journal":{"name":"The gulf journal of oncology","volume":"1 42","pages":"53-760"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The gulf journal of oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Groin dissection has been a nightmare for many surgeons due to its higher morbidity especially flap necrosis. Various modifications in incisions have been described in the literature to reduce the complications but with variable outcomes. By our novel "River Flow" incision technique, we have significantly reduced the procedure related complications without compromising onco surgical principles.

Methods: A prospective longitudinal clinical observational study was designed after Institutional Ethical Committee clearance, aiming to minimize the rate of complications, especially flap necrosis. All patients who underwent unilateral/bilateral ilio-inguinal block dissection (IIBD) from January 2014 to December 2021 were included in the study. The "River Flow" incision was made and standard ilio-inguinal block dissection was performed. Flap viability, seroma formation, lymphedema, infection, etc. were observed and noted during hospitalization and on followup. Clavien- Dindo classification was used to grade the postoperative complications. We have taken our historical data of 235 groin dissections as a control and compared them with the results of the present study. It is one of the largest studies on groin dissection so far.

Results: A total of 138 patients underwent 240 groin dissections. The most common diagnosis was carcinoma penis (44.9%) followed by carcinoma vulva (22.4%). Overall, the outcome of all groin dissections showed no postoperative mortality. None of the patients had complete flap necrosis. But in our historical data, the flap necrosis rate was 38%. The most common complication observed was seroma formation in 13.7% of cases followed by surgical site infection (6.52%). All the complications were managed conservatively. The postoperative stay of the patients was also significantly less. The median hospital stay was 3 days.

Conclusion: "River Flow" incision technique is a simple but effective novel surgical technique for therapeutic ILND for any surgical setup without the learning curve. It can avoid flap necrosis, and decrease morbidity significantly without compromising the onco surgical principle of standard groin dissection.

Key words: Groin dissection, skin necrosis, river flow incision.

腹股沟剥离“河流”切口并发症的噩梦结束了吗?-印度三级转诊肿瘤中心240例解剖的经验。
目的:腹股沟剥离术因其较高的发病率,尤其是皮瓣坏死,一直是许多外科医生的噩梦。文献中描述了各种切口的修改以减少并发症,但结果不一。通过我们新颖的“河流”切口技术,我们在不损害肿瘤手术原则的情况下显著减少了手术相关并发症。方法:经机构伦理委员会批准,设计一项前瞻性纵向临床观察研究,旨在减少并发症,特别是皮瓣坏死的发生率。2014年1月至2021年12月,所有接受单侧/双侧髂-腹股沟阻滞夹层(IIBD)手术的患者均被纳入研究。切开“河流”切口,进行标准的髂-腹股沟阻滞解剖。住院及随访期间观察并记录皮瓣活力、血肿形成、淋巴水肿、感染等情况。术后并发症采用Clavien- Dindo分级。我们以235例腹股沟夹层的历史数据作为对照,并将其与本研究的结果进行比较。这是迄今为止最大规模的腹股沟解剖研究之一。结果:138例患者共行240例腹股沟切除术。最常见的诊断是阴茎癌(44.9%),其次是外阴癌(22.4%)。总的来说,所有腹股沟解剖的结果显示没有术后死亡率。所有患者均无皮瓣完全坏死。但在我们的历史数据中,皮瓣坏死率为38%。最常见的并发症是血肿形成(13.7%),其次是手术部位感染(6.52%)。所有并发症均予保守处理。患者术后住院时间明显缩短。平均住院时间为3天。结论:“河流”切口技术是一种简单而有效的新型手术技术,适用于任何手术设置,无需学习曲线。它可以避免皮瓣坏死,在不影响标准腹股沟夹层手术原则的情况下显著降低发病率。关键词:腹股沟剥离,皮肤坏死,河流切口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The gulf journal of oncology
The gulf journal of oncology Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信