Comparing In-Person Only, Telemedicine Only, and Hybrid Health Care Visits Among Older Adults in Safety-Net Clinics.

Omolola E Adepoju, Patrick Dang, Melissa R Valdez
{"title":"Comparing In-Person Only, Telemedicine Only, and Hybrid Health Care Visits Among Older Adults in Safety-Net Clinics.","authors":"Omolola E Adepoju,&nbsp;Patrick Dang,&nbsp;Melissa R Valdez","doi":"10.1089/tmr.2023.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older adults face challenges in seeking health care. This study examined factors associated with in-person only versus telemedicine only versus hybrid health care visits among adults 65+ in safety-net clinics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from a large Texas-based Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) network. The dataset included 12,279 appointments for 3914 unique older adults between March and November 2020. The outcome of interest was a 3-level indicator of telemedicine visits: in-person visits only, telemedicine visits only, and hybrid (in person + telemedicine) visits during the study period. We used a multinomial logit model adjusting for patient level characteristics to assess the strength of the relationships.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to their white counterparts, black and Hispanic older adults were significantly likely to have telemedicine only visits versus in-person only visits (black RRR: 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.86; Hispanic RRR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.36-0.60). However, there were no significant racial and ethnic differences in hybrid utilization (black RRR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.67-1.23; Hispanic RRR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.70-1.07).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our findings suggest that hybrid opportunities may bridge racial and ethnic disparities in access to care. Clinics should consider building capacity for both in-person and telemedicine opportunities as complementary strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22295,"journal":{"name":"Telemedicine reports","volume":"4 1","pages":"93-99"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10240331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telemedicine reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/tmr.2023.0003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Older adults face challenges in seeking health care. This study examined factors associated with in-person only versus telemedicine only versus hybrid health care visits among adults 65+ in safety-net clinics.

Methods: Data were obtained from a large Texas-based Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) network. The dataset included 12,279 appointments for 3914 unique older adults between March and November 2020. The outcome of interest was a 3-level indicator of telemedicine visits: in-person visits only, telemedicine visits only, and hybrid (in person + telemedicine) visits during the study period. We used a multinomial logit model adjusting for patient level characteristics to assess the strength of the relationships.

Results: Compared to their white counterparts, black and Hispanic older adults were significantly likely to have telemedicine only visits versus in-person only visits (black RRR: 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.41-0.86; Hispanic RRR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.36-0.60). However, there were no significant racial and ethnic differences in hybrid utilization (black RRR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.67-1.23; Hispanic RRR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.70-1.07).

Discussion: Our findings suggest that hybrid opportunities may bridge racial and ethnic disparities in access to care. Clinics should consider building capacity for both in-person and telemedicine opportunities as complementary strategies.

比较安全网诊所中老年人的面对面、远程医疗和混合医疗访问。
老年人在寻求医疗保健方面面临挑战。本研究调查了65岁以上的成年人在安全网诊所中仅面对面、仅远程医疗和混合医疗访问的相关因素。方法:数据来自德克萨斯州一家大型联邦合格健康中心(FQHC)网络。该数据集包括2020年3月至11月期间3914名独特老年人的12279次预约。感兴趣的结果是远程医疗访问的3级指标:在研究期间,仅亲自访问,仅远程医疗访问和混合(亲自+远程医疗)访问。我们使用多项logit模型调整患者水平特征来评估关系的强度。结果:与白人老年人相比,黑人和西班牙裔老年人只进行远程医疗就诊的可能性显著高于只进行面对面就诊的可能性(黑色rr: 0.59, 95%可信区间[CI]: 0.41-0.86;西班牙RRR: 0.46, 95% CI: 0.36-0.60)。然而,在杂交利用方面,种族和民族间没有显著差异(黑色RRR: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.67-1.23;西班牙RRR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.70-1.07)。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,混合机会可能弥合种族和民族在获得护理方面的差异。诊所应考虑建设面对面和远程医疗机会的能力,作为补充战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信