Reduced cutout for reverse oblique intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with trochanteric fixation advanced (TFN-A) nail compared to the short gamma-3 nail.
Etay Elbaz, Samuel Morgan, Shai Factor, Or Shaked, Nadav Graif, Tomer Ben-Tov, Amal Khoury, Yaniv Warschawski
{"title":"Reduced cutout for reverse oblique intertrochanteric hip fractures treated with trochanteric fixation advanced (TFN-A) nail compared to the short gamma-3 nail.","authors":"Etay Elbaz, Samuel Morgan, Shai Factor, Or Shaked, Nadav Graif, Tomer Ben-Tov, Amal Khoury, Yaniv Warschawski","doi":"10.1051/sicotj/2023013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Reverse oblique fractures (AO/OTA 31-A3) account for 5-23% of all intertrochanteric fractures and are challenging to manage. The Gamma 3-Proximal Femoral Nail (GPFN) and the Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advanced (TFNA) are two common cephalomedullary systems used to treat this fracture. No study has reported on outcomes with the TFN-A for reverse oblique fractures. This study aimed to compare outcomes and complication rates in patients with reverse oblique fractures, treated with either TFNA or GPFN.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A total of 203 patients with reverse oblique fractures (137 in the GPFN group and 66 in the TFNA group), were treated in our institution between June 2010 and May 2019. Data was collected on postoperative radiological variables including screw or blade location, and tip-apex distance (TAD). Data were also collected for non-orthopaedic complication rates and orthopaedic complications. A sub-group analysis was additionally performed for different nail lengths.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found no significant difference in the overall rate of complications and revisions between the two groups. Patients treated with the 235 mm TFN-A nail sustained lower rates of cutout, compared to 180 mm GPFN (GPFN: 6% TFN-A: 0%, p = 0.043). The frequency of revision surgeries and malunions/non-unions did not differ significantly between the two groups and additionally showed no difference in the subgroup analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The 235 mm TFN-A was associated with lower rates of cut-out compared to the short GPFN for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures. Future well-designed prospective studies are warranted to investigate the role of the TFN-A in improving outcomes for such fractures.</p>","PeriodicalId":46378,"journal":{"name":"SICOT-J","volume":"9 ","pages":"16"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10241228/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SICOT-J","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2023013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Reverse oblique fractures (AO/OTA 31-A3) account for 5-23% of all intertrochanteric fractures and are challenging to manage. The Gamma 3-Proximal Femoral Nail (GPFN) and the Trochanteric Fixation Nail Advanced (TFNA) are two common cephalomedullary systems used to treat this fracture. No study has reported on outcomes with the TFN-A for reverse oblique fractures. This study aimed to compare outcomes and complication rates in patients with reverse oblique fractures, treated with either TFNA or GPFN.
Patients and methods: A total of 203 patients with reverse oblique fractures (137 in the GPFN group and 66 in the TFNA group), were treated in our institution between June 2010 and May 2019. Data was collected on postoperative radiological variables including screw or blade location, and tip-apex distance (TAD). Data were also collected for non-orthopaedic complication rates and orthopaedic complications. A sub-group analysis was additionally performed for different nail lengths.
Results: We found no significant difference in the overall rate of complications and revisions between the two groups. Patients treated with the 235 mm TFN-A nail sustained lower rates of cutout, compared to 180 mm GPFN (GPFN: 6% TFN-A: 0%, p = 0.043). The frequency of revision surgeries and malunions/non-unions did not differ significantly between the two groups and additionally showed no difference in the subgroup analysis.
Conclusion: The 235 mm TFN-A was associated with lower rates of cut-out compared to the short GPFN for reverse oblique intertrochanteric fractures. Future well-designed prospective studies are warranted to investigate the role of the TFN-A in improving outcomes for such fractures.
背景:逆斜骨折(AO/OTA 31-A3)占所有转子间骨折的5-23%,治疗难度较大。Gamma 3-股骨近端钉(GPFN)和高级转子固定钉(TFNA)是治疗这种骨折的两种常用的头髓系统。没有研究报道TFN-A治疗反向斜骨折的结果。本研究旨在比较TFNA或GPFN治疗的反向斜向骨折患者的结局和并发症发生率。患者和方法:2010年6月至2019年5月,我院共收治203例反向斜位骨折患者(GPFN组137例,TFNA组66例)。收集术后放射学变量的数据,包括螺钉或叶片的位置以及尖端距离(TAD)。我们还收集了非骨科并发症发生率和骨科并发症的数据。另外对不同指甲长度进行亚组分析。结果:我们发现两组在并发症的总发生率和修复率上没有显著差异。与180 mm GPFN相比,使用235 mm TFN-A治疗的患者的切开率较低(GPFN: 6% TFN-A: 0%, p = 0.043)。翻修手术和畸形愈合/不愈合的频率在两组之间没有显着差异,并且在亚组分析中也没有差异。结论:与短GPFN相比,235 mm TFN-A治疗反向斜转子间骨折的切开率较低。未来设计良好的前瞻性研究有必要探讨TFN-A在改善此类骨折预后中的作用。