A Simple Admission Order-set Improves Adherence to Canadian Guidelines for Hospitalized Patients With Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

Steven Li Fraine, Isabelle Malhamé, Teresa Cafaro, Camille Simard, Elizabeth MacNamara, Myriam Martel, Alan Barkun, Jonathan M Wyse
{"title":"A Simple Admission Order-set Improves Adherence to Canadian Guidelines for Hospitalized Patients With Severe Ulcerative Colitis.","authors":"Steven Li Fraine,&nbsp;Isabelle Malhamé,&nbsp;Teresa Cafaro,&nbsp;Camille Simard,&nbsp;Elizabeth MacNamara,&nbsp;Myriam Martel,&nbsp;Alan Barkun,&nbsp;Jonathan M Wyse","doi":"10.1093/jcag/gwac032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals hospitalized with severe ulcerative colitis represent a complex group of patients. Variation exists in the quality of care of admitted patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We hypothesized that implementation of a standardized admission order set could result in improved adherence to current best practice guidelines (Toronto Consensus Statements) for the management of this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted with severe ulcerative colitis to a Montreal tertiary center was conducted. Two cohorts were defined based on pre- and post-implementation of a standardized order set. Adherence to 11 quality indicators was assessed before and after implementation of the intervention. These included: <i>Clostridioides difficile</i> and stool cultures testing, ordering an abdominal X-ray and CRP, organizing a flexible sigmoidoscopy, documenting latent tuberculosis, initiating thromboprophylaxis, use of intravenous steroids, prescribing infliximab if refractory to steroids, limiting narcotics, and surgical consultation if refractory to medical therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adherence to 6 of the 11 quality indicators was improved in the post-intervention cohort. Significant increases were noted in adherence to <i>C difficile</i> testing (75.5% versus 91.9%, <i>P</i> < 0.05), CRP testing (71.4% versus 94.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), testing for latent tuberculosis (38.1% versus 84.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), thromboprophylaxis (28.6% versus 94.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), adequate corticosteroids prescription (72.9% versus 94.6%, <i>P</i> < 0.01), and limitation of narcotics prescribed (68.8% versus 38.9%, <i>P</i> < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of a standardized order set, focused on pre-defined quality indicators for hospitalized patients with severe UC, was associated with meaningful improvements to most quality indicators defined by the Toronto Consensus Statements.</p>","PeriodicalId":17263,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","volume":"6 3","pages":"131-135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10235590/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jcag/gwac032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals hospitalized with severe ulcerative colitis represent a complex group of patients. Variation exists in the quality of care of admitted patients with inflammatory bowel disease. We hypothesized that implementation of a standardized admission order set could result in improved adherence to current best practice guidelines (Toronto Consensus Statements) for the management of this patient population.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study of patients admitted with severe ulcerative colitis to a Montreal tertiary center was conducted. Two cohorts were defined based on pre- and post-implementation of a standardized order set. Adherence to 11 quality indicators was assessed before and after implementation of the intervention. These included: Clostridioides difficile and stool cultures testing, ordering an abdominal X-ray and CRP, organizing a flexible sigmoidoscopy, documenting latent tuberculosis, initiating thromboprophylaxis, use of intravenous steroids, prescribing infliximab if refractory to steroids, limiting narcotics, and surgical consultation if refractory to medical therapy.

Results: Adherence to 6 of the 11 quality indicators was improved in the post-intervention cohort. Significant increases were noted in adherence to C difficile testing (75.5% versus 91.9%, P < 0.05), CRP testing (71.4% versus 94.6%, P < 0.01), testing for latent tuberculosis (38.1% versus 84.6%, P < 0.01), thromboprophylaxis (28.6% versus 94.6%, P < 0.01), adequate corticosteroids prescription (72.9% versus 94.6%, P < 0.01), and limitation of narcotics prescribed (68.8% versus 38.9%, P < 0.01).

Conclusions: Implementation of a standardized order set, focused on pre-defined quality indicators for hospitalized patients with severe UC, was associated with meaningful improvements to most quality indicators defined by the Toronto Consensus Statements.

简单的入院顺序可提高重症溃疡性结肠炎住院患者对加拿大指南的依从性。
背景:重度溃疡性结肠炎住院患者是一个复杂的群体。炎症性肠病住院患者的护理质量存在差异。我们假设,实施标准化的入院顺序集可以提高对当前最佳实践指南(多伦多共识声明)的依从性,以管理这一患者群体。方法:对蒙特利尔三级中心收治的严重溃疡性结肠炎患者进行回顾性队列研究。两个队列是根据实施前和实施后的标准化顺序集来定义的。在实施干预之前和之后,对11项质量指标的依从性进行了评估。其中包括:艰难梭菌和粪便培养试验,安排腹部x线检查和CRP,组织乙状结肠镜检查,记录潜伏结核,开始血栓预防,静脉注射类固醇,如果类固醇难治性开英夫利昔单抗,限制麻醉剂,如果药物治疗难治性开外科会诊。结果:在干预后队列中,11项质量指标中有6项的依从性得到改善。艰难梭菌检测(75.5%比91.9%,P < 0.05)、CRP检测(71.4%比94.6%,P < 0.01)、潜伏性肺结核检测(38.1%比84.6%,P < 0.01)、血栓预防(28.6%比94.6%,P < 0.01)、适当的皮质类固醇处方(72.9%比94.6%,P < 0.01)和限制麻醉品处方(68.8%比38.9%,P < 0.01)的依从性显著增加。结论:对严重UC住院患者实施标准化顺序集,重点关注预定义的质量指标,与多伦多共识声明定义的大多数质量指标有意义的改善相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
296
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信