Peri-Insular Hemispherotomy: A Systematic Review and Institutional Experience.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Charles F Yates, Stephen Malone, Kate Riney, Ubaid Shah, Martin J Wood
{"title":"Peri-Insular Hemispherotomy: A Systematic Review and Institutional Experience.","authors":"Charles F Yates,&nbsp;Stephen Malone,&nbsp;Kate Riney,&nbsp;Ubaid Shah,&nbsp;Martin J Wood","doi":"10.1159/000529098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peri-insular hemispherotomy (PIH) is a hemispheric separation technique under the broader hemispherotomy group, a surgical treatment for patients with intractable epilepsy. Hemispherotomy techniques such as the PIH, vertical parasagittal hemispherotomy (VPH), and modified-lateral hemispherotomy are commonly assessed together, despite significant differences in anatomical approach and patient selection. We aim to describe patient selection, outcomes, and complications of PIH in its own right.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review of the literature, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted, with searches of the PubMed and Embase databases. A local series including patients receiving PIH and followed up at the Queensland Children's Hospital between 2014 and 2020 was included.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Systematic review of the literature identified 393 patients from 13 eligible studies. Engel class 1 outcomes occurred in 82.4% of patients, while 8.6% developed post-operative hydrocephalus. Hydrocephalus was most common in the youngest patient cohorts. Developmental pathology was present in 114 (40.8%) patients, who had fewer Engel 1 outcomes compared to those with acquired pathology (69.1% vs. 83.7%, p = 0.0167). The local series included 13 patients, 11/13 (84.6%) had Engel class 1 seizure outcomes. Post-operative hydrocephalus occurred in 2 patients (15.4%), and 10/13 (76.9%) patients had worsened neurological deficit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PIH delivers Engel 1 outcomes for over 4 in 5 patients selected for this procedure, greater than described in combined hemispherectomy analyses. It is an effective technique in patients with developmental and acquired pathologies, despite general preference of VPH in this patient group. Finally, very young patients may have significant seizure and cognitive benefits from PIH; however, hydrocephalus is most common in this group warranting careful risk-benefit assessment. This review delivers a dedicated PIH outcomes analysis to inform clinical and patient decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":54631,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10064387/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000529098","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Peri-insular hemispherotomy (PIH) is a hemispheric separation technique under the broader hemispherotomy group, a surgical treatment for patients with intractable epilepsy. Hemispherotomy techniques such as the PIH, vertical parasagittal hemispherotomy (VPH), and modified-lateral hemispherotomy are commonly assessed together, despite significant differences in anatomical approach and patient selection. We aim to describe patient selection, outcomes, and complications of PIH in its own right.

Methods: A systematic review of the literature, in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, was conducted, with searches of the PubMed and Embase databases. A local series including patients receiving PIH and followed up at the Queensland Children's Hospital between 2014 and 2020 was included.

Results: Systematic review of the literature identified 393 patients from 13 eligible studies. Engel class 1 outcomes occurred in 82.4% of patients, while 8.6% developed post-operative hydrocephalus. Hydrocephalus was most common in the youngest patient cohorts. Developmental pathology was present in 114 (40.8%) patients, who had fewer Engel 1 outcomes compared to those with acquired pathology (69.1% vs. 83.7%, p = 0.0167). The local series included 13 patients, 11/13 (84.6%) had Engel class 1 seizure outcomes. Post-operative hydrocephalus occurred in 2 patients (15.4%), and 10/13 (76.9%) patients had worsened neurological deficit.

Conclusion: PIH delivers Engel 1 outcomes for over 4 in 5 patients selected for this procedure, greater than described in combined hemispherectomy analyses. It is an effective technique in patients with developmental and acquired pathologies, despite general preference of VPH in this patient group. Finally, very young patients may have significant seizure and cognitive benefits from PIH; however, hydrocephalus is most common in this group warranting careful risk-benefit assessment. This review delivers a dedicated PIH outcomes analysis to inform clinical and patient decision-making.

Abstract Image

岛周半球切开术:系统回顾和机构经验。
简介:岛叶周围半球切开术(PIH)是广义半球切开术组下的一种半球分离技术,是一种治疗难治性癫痫的手术方法。尽管解剖入路和患者选择存在显著差异,但通常将PIH、垂直副矢状半球切开术(VPH)和改良外侧半球切开术等半球切开术一起进行评估。我们的目的是描述患者的选择,结果,并在其本身的权利的PIH并发症。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目对文献进行系统评价,并检索PubMed和Embase数据库。包括2014年至2020年期间在昆士兰儿童医院接受PIH并随访的当地系列患者。结果:系统回顾文献,从13项符合条件的研究中确定了393例患者。82.4%的患者出现Engel 1级结局,8.6%的患者出现术后脑积水。脑积水在最年轻的患者队列中最常见。114例(40.8%)患者存在发育性病理,与获得性病理患者相比,其Engel 1结果较少(69.1% vs. 83.7%, p = 0.0167)。局部纳入13例患者,11/13(84.6%)发生Engel 1级癫痫发作。术后发生脑积水2例(15.4%),10/13例(76.9%)患者神经功能缺损加重。结论:选择PIH手术的患者中,超过4 / 5的患者达到Engel 1结果,高于联合半球切除术分析。这是一种有效的技术,在患者的发展和获得性病理,尽管普遍倾向于VPH在这组患者。最后,非常年轻的患者可能从PIH中获得显著的癫痫发作和认知益处;然而,脑积水在这一组中最常见,需要仔细的风险-收益评估。本综述提供了一个专门的PIH结果分析,为临床和患者决策提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Neurosurgery
Pediatric Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Articles in ''Pediatric Neurosurgery'' strives to publish new information and observations in pediatric neurosurgery and the allied fields of neurology, neuroradiology and neuropathology as they relate to the etiology of neurologic diseases and the operative care of affected patients. In addition to experimental and clinical studies, the journal presents critical reviews which provide the reader with an update on selected topics as well as case histories and reports on advances in methodology and technique. This thought-provoking focus encourages dissemination of information from neurosurgeons and neuroscientists around the world that will be of interest to clinicians and researchers concerned with pediatric, congenital, and developmental diseases of the nervous system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信