A Pragmatic Clinical Trial Approach to Assessing and Monitoring Suicidal Ideation: Results from A National US Trauma Care System Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Allison Engstrom, Kathleen Moloney, Jefferson Nguyen, Lea Parker, Michelle Roberts, Rddhi Moodliar, Joan Russo, Jin Wang, Hannah Scheuer, Douglas Zatzick
{"title":"A Pragmatic Clinical Trial Approach to Assessing and Monitoring Suicidal Ideation: Results from A National US Trauma Care System Study.","authors":"Allison Engstrom, Kathleen Moloney, Jefferson Nguyen, Lea Parker, Michelle Roberts, Rddhi Moodliar, Joan Russo, Jin Wang, Hannah Scheuer, Douglas Zatzick","doi":"10.1080/00332747.2021.1991200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Few investigations have comprehensively described methods for assessing and monitoring suicidal ideation in pragmatic clinical trials of mental health services interventions. This investigation's goal was to assess a collaborative care intervention's effectiveness in reducing suicidal ideation and describe suicide monitoring implementation in a nationwide protocol.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The investigation was a secondary analysis of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial at 25-Level I trauma centers. Injury survivors (N = 635) were randomized to control (n = 370) and intervention (n = 265) conditions and assessed at baseline hospitalization and follow-up at 3-, 6- and 12-months post-injury. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) item-9 was used to evaluate patients for suicidal ideation. Mixed model regression was used to assess intervention versus control group changes in PHQ-9 item-9 scores over time and associations between baseline characteristics and development of suicidal ideation longitudinally. As part of the study implementation process assessment, suicide outreach call logs were also reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 50% of patients endorsed suicidal ideation at ≥1 assessment. Intervention patients relative to control patients demonstrated reductions in endorsements of suicidal ideation that did not achieve statistical significance (F[3,1461] = 0.74, <i>P</i> = .53). The study team completed outreach phone calls, texts or voice messages to 268 patients with PHQ-9 item-9 scores ≥1 (n = 161 control, n = 107 intervention).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Suicide assessment and monitoring can be feasibly implemented in large-scale pragmatic clinical trials. Intervention patients demonstrated less suicidal ideation over time; however, these comparisons did not achieve statistical significance. Intensive pragmatic trial monitoring may mask treatment effects by providing control patients a supportive intervention.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02655354.</p>","PeriodicalId":49656,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8916972/pdf/nihms-1751704.pdf","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry-Interpersonal and Biological Processes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00332747.2021.1991200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/12/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Objective: Few investigations have comprehensively described methods for assessing and monitoring suicidal ideation in pragmatic clinical trials of mental health services interventions. This investigation's goal was to assess a collaborative care intervention's effectiveness in reducing suicidal ideation and describe suicide monitoring implementation in a nationwide protocol.

Method: The investigation was a secondary analysis of a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial at 25-Level I trauma centers. Injury survivors (N = 635) were randomized to control (n = 370) and intervention (n = 265) conditions and assessed at baseline hospitalization and follow-up at 3-, 6- and 12-months post-injury. The Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) item-9 was used to evaluate patients for suicidal ideation. Mixed model regression was used to assess intervention versus control group changes in PHQ-9 item-9 scores over time and associations between baseline characteristics and development of suicidal ideation longitudinally. As part of the study implementation process assessment, suicide outreach call logs were also reviewed.

Results: Over 50% of patients endorsed suicidal ideation at ≥1 assessment. Intervention patients relative to control patients demonstrated reductions in endorsements of suicidal ideation that did not achieve statistical significance (F[3,1461] = 0.74, P = .53). The study team completed outreach phone calls, texts or voice messages to 268 patients with PHQ-9 item-9 scores ≥1 (n = 161 control, n = 107 intervention).

Conclusions: Suicide assessment and monitoring can be feasibly implemented in large-scale pragmatic clinical trials. Intervention patients demonstrated less suicidal ideation over time; however, these comparisons did not achieve statistical significance. Intensive pragmatic trial monitoring may mask treatment effects by providing control patients a supportive intervention.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02655354.

评估和监测自杀意念的实用临床试验方法:来自美国国家创伤护理系统研究的结果。
目的:在实用的心理健康服务干预临床试验中,很少有调查全面描述评估和监测自杀意念的方法。本调查的目的是评估协作护理干预在减少自杀意念方面的有效性,并描述全国协议中自杀监测的实施情况。方法:本研究是对25个一级创伤中心的阶梯式楔形随机试验的二次分析。损伤幸存者(N = 635)被随机分为对照组(N = 370)和干预组(N = 265),并在基线住院和损伤后3、6和12个月随访时进行评估。采用患者健康问卷(PHQ-9)第9项评估患者的自杀意念。混合模型回归用于评估干预组与对照组在PHQ-9项目9得分随时间的变化,以及基线特征与自杀意念发展之间的纵向关系。作为研究实施过程评估的一部分,自杀外展电话记录也被审查。结果:超过50%的患者在≥1次评估中认可自杀意念。与对照组相比,干预组患者的自杀意念认同减少,但差异无统计学意义(F[3,1461] = 0.74, P = 0.53)。研究小组对PHQ-9项目9得分≥1的268例患者(对照组161例,干预组107例)进行电话、短信或语音留言外联。结论:自杀评估与监测在大规模实用临床试验中是可行的。随着时间的推移,干预患者表现出较少的自杀意念;然而,这些比较没有达到统计学意义。通过为对照患者提供支持性干预,强化实用的试验监测可能掩盖治疗效果。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02655354。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internationally recognized, Psychiatry has responded to rapid research advances in psychiatry, psychology, neuroscience, trauma, and psychopathology. Increasingly, studies in these areas are being placed in the context of human development across the lifespan, and the multiple systems that influence individual functioning. This journal provides broadly applicable and effective strategies for dealing with the major unsolved problems in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信