Primary care provider perspectives on virtual and in-person depression management during the COVID-19 pandemic.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES
Families Systems & Health Pub Date : 2023-12-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1037/fsh0000801
Lucinda B Leung, Joya G Chrystal, Karen E Dyer, Catherine E Brayton, Michael A Karakashian, Elizabeth M Yano, Alexander S Young, Paul G Shekelle, Alison B Hamilton
{"title":"Primary care provider perspectives on virtual and in-person depression management during the COVID-19 pandemic.","authors":"Lucinda B Leung, Joya G Chrystal, Karen E Dyer, Catherine E Brayton, Michael A Karakashian, Elizabeth M Yano, Alexander S Young, Paul G Shekelle, Alison B Hamilton","doi":"10.1037/fsh0000801","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care providers (PCPs), nurses, and integrated mental health specialists continued to collaboratively manage depression among patients using both in-person and virtual (i.e., hybrid) modalities. Few studies have characterized how hybrid services are currently delivered within interdisciplinary primary care teams. This study aimed to understand frontline PCPs' perspectives on providing hybrid virtual and in-person depression care during the pandemic.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>From September to November 2020, 12 semistructured individual interviews focused on depression management were conducted with PCPs in two Veterans Health Administration (VA) clinics in Los Angeles, which resumed in-person services while balancing rising COVID-19 cases. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for depression management patterns. Themes were derived using a team-based constant comparative analytic approach.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pandemic and subsequent expanded use of virtual care necessitated clinic adaptations to depression assessments and procedures. PCPs perceived increased depression and anxiety among patients with existing psychiatric conditions, attributed to social distancing and isolation restrictions. They expressed acceptance of virtual care modalities for patients' depression management. PCPs did not perceive a delay in mental health care delivery in the shift to virtual care but noted the possibility of patients being lost to follow-up.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>During the pandemic, there has been heightened PCP concern for patients' emotional well-being and adaptations of clinic processes to meet needs for depression care. While PCPs were optimistic about new virtual care options for depression management, virtual care transfers remained poorly defined and the extent to which patient care experiences and health outcomes have been disrupted remains unknown. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":55612,"journal":{"name":"Families Systems & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10674027/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Families Systems & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/fsh0000801","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: During the COVID-19 pandemic, primary care providers (PCPs), nurses, and integrated mental health specialists continued to collaboratively manage depression among patients using both in-person and virtual (i.e., hybrid) modalities. Few studies have characterized how hybrid services are currently delivered within interdisciplinary primary care teams. This study aimed to understand frontline PCPs' perspectives on providing hybrid virtual and in-person depression care during the pandemic.

Method: From September to November 2020, 12 semistructured individual interviews focused on depression management were conducted with PCPs in two Veterans Health Administration (VA) clinics in Los Angeles, which resumed in-person services while balancing rising COVID-19 cases. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and coded for depression management patterns. Themes were derived using a team-based constant comparative analytic approach.

Results: The pandemic and subsequent expanded use of virtual care necessitated clinic adaptations to depression assessments and procedures. PCPs perceived increased depression and anxiety among patients with existing psychiatric conditions, attributed to social distancing and isolation restrictions. They expressed acceptance of virtual care modalities for patients' depression management. PCPs did not perceive a delay in mental health care delivery in the shift to virtual care but noted the possibility of patients being lost to follow-up.

Conclusions: During the pandemic, there has been heightened PCP concern for patients' emotional well-being and adaptations of clinic processes to meet needs for depression care. While PCPs were optimistic about new virtual care options for depression management, virtual care transfers remained poorly defined and the extent to which patient care experiences and health outcomes have been disrupted remains unknown. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

初级保健提供者对COVID-19大流行期间虚拟和面对面抑郁管理的看法
导语:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,初级保健提供者(pcp)、护士和综合精神卫生专家继续通过面对面和虚拟(即混合)方式合作管理患者的抑郁症。很少有研究描述了目前在跨学科初级保健团队中如何提供混合服务。本研究旨在了解一线pcp在大流行期间提供虚拟和面对面混合抑郁症护理的观点。方法:2020年9月至11月,在洛杉矶两家退伍军人健康管理局(VA)诊所与pcp进行了12次半结构化个人访谈,重点是抑郁症管理,这些诊所在平衡COVID-19病例上升的同时恢复了面对面服务。访谈录音,转录和编码抑郁管理模式。使用基于团队的持续比较分析方法得出主题。结果:大流行和随后的虚拟护理的扩大使用需要临床适应抑郁症的评估和程序。pcp认为,由于社交距离和隔离限制,患有现有精神疾病的患者抑郁和焦虑增加。他们表示接受虚拟护理模式来管理患者的抑郁症。pcp并没有察觉到虚拟护理会延迟精神卫生保健的提供,但注意到患者可能会失去随访。结论:在大流行期间,PCP对患者情绪健康和适应临床流程以满足抑郁症护理需求的关注有所增加。虽然pcp对抑郁症管理的新虚拟护理选择持乐观态度,但虚拟护理转移仍然定义不清,患者护理体验和健康结果受到破坏的程度仍然未知。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2023 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Families Systems & Health
Families Systems & Health HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
81
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Families, Systems, & Health publishes clinical research, training, and theoretical contributions in the areas of families and health, with particular focus on collaborative family healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信