A conceptual framework for the exploration of the relationship between systems of paramedicine and system performance

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Timothy Makrides , Linda Ross , Cameron Gosling , Peter O’Meara
{"title":"A conceptual framework for the exploration of the relationship between systems of paramedicine and system performance","authors":"Timothy Makrides ,&nbsp;Linda Ross ,&nbsp;Cameron Gosling ,&nbsp;Peter O’Meara","doi":"10.1016/j.auec.2022.09.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Over the past 60 years since its inception, the Anglo-American Paramedic System has continued to grow and evolve. While brief and fragmented accounts of the differences between systems have been noted in the literature, until recently there has been a paucity of research that explores and identifies sub-models of paramedicine within the Anglo-American Paramedic System.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>This article describes a conceptual framework that sets a roadmap for defining and comparing two newly identified sub-models of the Anglo-American Paramedic System.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A conceptual framework for the exploration of these novel sub-models was developed on the basis of the work completed by Donabedian as well as Turncock and Handler. These two sub-models worked to develop a model for quality assessment and performance measurement in the public health system.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The conceptual framework consists of six components that are strongly related to each other: system design, macro context, mission and purpose, structure, service delivery models and quality outcome measures. While this framework relates specifically to two novel paramedic systems known as the Professionally Autonomous an Directive paramedic systems, it can be used to measure any integrated health model.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The conceptual framework described in this paper provides a stepwise roadmap for the definition and comparison of the newly identified paramedic systems to better inform future research that defines and compares paramedic system design and performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55979,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Emergency Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Emergency Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2588994X22000835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background

Over the past 60 years since its inception, the Anglo-American Paramedic System has continued to grow and evolve. While brief and fragmented accounts of the differences between systems have been noted in the literature, until recently there has been a paucity of research that explores and identifies sub-models of paramedicine within the Anglo-American Paramedic System.

Objectives

This article describes a conceptual framework that sets a roadmap for defining and comparing two newly identified sub-models of the Anglo-American Paramedic System.

Methods

A conceptual framework for the exploration of these novel sub-models was developed on the basis of the work completed by Donabedian as well as Turncock and Handler. These two sub-models worked to develop a model for quality assessment and performance measurement in the public health system.

Results

The conceptual framework consists of six components that are strongly related to each other: system design, macro context, mission and purpose, structure, service delivery models and quality outcome measures. While this framework relates specifically to two novel paramedic systems known as the Professionally Autonomous an Directive paramedic systems, it can be used to measure any integrated health model.

Conclusion

The conceptual framework described in this paper provides a stepwise roadmap for the definition and comparison of the newly identified paramedic systems to better inform future research that defines and compares paramedic system design and performance.

探索医疗辅助系统与系统绩效之间关系的概念框架
背景自成立以来的60年里,英美护理系统不断发展壮大。虽然在文献中已经注意到对系统之间的差异的简要和零散的描述,直到最近,在英美护理系统中探索和确定护理药物子模型的研究还很少。目的本文描述了一个概念框架,为定义和比较英美护理系统的两个新确定的子模型设定了路线图子模型是在Donabedian以及Turncock和Handler完成的工作的基础上开发的。这两个子模型致力于开发公共卫生系统质量评估和绩效衡量模型。结果该概念框架由六个相互关联的组成部分组成:系统设计、宏观背景、使命和目的、结构、服务提供模式和质量结果衡量标准。虽然该框架具体涉及两种新型护理系统,即专业自主护理系统,但它可用于测量任何综合健康模型。结论本文描述的概念框架为新确定的护理系统的定义和比较提供了一个逐步的路线图,以更好地为未来定义和比较护理系统设计和性能的研究提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australasian Emergency Care
Australasian Emergency Care Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Australasian Emergency Care is an international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to supporting emergency nurses, physicians, paramedics and other professionals in advancing the science and practice of emergency care, wherever it is delivered. As the official journal of the College of Emergency Nursing Australasia (CENA), Australasian Emergency Care is a conduit for clinical, applied, and theoretical research and knowledge that advances the science and practice of emergency care in original, innovative and challenging ways. The journal serves as a leading voice for the emergency care community, reflecting its inter-professional diversity, and the importance of collaboration and shared decision-making to achieve quality patient outcomes. It is strongly focussed on advancing the patient experience and quality of care across the emergency care continuum, spanning the pre-hospital, hospital and post-hospital settings within Australasia and beyond.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信