Spine stabilization exercises are not superior to flexion exercises for ultrasound-detected muscle thickness changes in patients with chronic low back pain and lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Acta ortopedica mexicana Pub Date : 2022-07-01
T I Nava-Bringas, Y P Trani-Chagoya, L Ventura-Ríos, C Hernández-Díaz, L O Romero-Fierro, S I Macías-Hernández
{"title":"Spine stabilization exercises are not superior to flexion exercises for ultrasound-detected muscle thickness changes in patients with chronic low back pain and lumbar spondylolisthesis.","authors":"T I Nava-Bringas,&nbsp;Y P Trani-Chagoya,&nbsp;L Ventura-Ríos,&nbsp;C Hernández-Díaz,&nbsp;L O Romero-Fierro,&nbsp;S I Macías-Hernández","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>exercise programs can reduce pain and improve functionality in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and chronic low back pain. However, there is still no consensus surrounding the superiority of any specific routine for exercise-induced trophic changes of lumbar muscles. The aim was to compare the changes in the primary lumbar stabilizing muscle thickness after spine stabilization exercises and flexion exercises in patients with spondylolisthesis and chronic low back pain.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>prospective, longitudinal and comparative study was carried out. Twenty-one treatment-naive patients with a diagnosis of both chronic low back pain and degenerative spondylolisthesis over the age of 50 were included. A physical therapist taught participants either spine stabilization exercises or flexion exercises to execute daily at home. The thickness of the primary lumbar muscles was measured through ultrasound (at rest and contraction) at baseline and three months. A Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were performed for comparisons, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated for associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>we did not find statistically between the exercise programs: all patients presented significant changes in the thickness of the multifidus muscle but in none of the other evaluated muscles.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>there is no difference between spine stabilization exercises and flexion exercises after three months in terms of the changes in muscle thickness evaluated by ultrasound.</p>","PeriodicalId":7081,"journal":{"name":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","volume":"36 4","pages":"230-233"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta ortopedica mexicana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: exercise programs can reduce pain and improve functionality in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and chronic low back pain. However, there is still no consensus surrounding the superiority of any specific routine for exercise-induced trophic changes of lumbar muscles. The aim was to compare the changes in the primary lumbar stabilizing muscle thickness after spine stabilization exercises and flexion exercises in patients with spondylolisthesis and chronic low back pain.

Material and methods: prospective, longitudinal and comparative study was carried out. Twenty-one treatment-naive patients with a diagnosis of both chronic low back pain and degenerative spondylolisthesis over the age of 50 were included. A physical therapist taught participants either spine stabilization exercises or flexion exercises to execute daily at home. The thickness of the primary lumbar muscles was measured through ultrasound (at rest and contraction) at baseline and three months. A Mann-Whitney U test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test were performed for comparisons, and Spearman's rank correlation coefficients were calculated for associations.

Results: we did not find statistically between the exercise programs: all patients presented significant changes in the thickness of the multifidus muscle but in none of the other evaluated muscles.

Conclusion: there is no difference between spine stabilization exercises and flexion exercises after three months in terms of the changes in muscle thickness evaluated by ultrasound.

对于慢性腰痛和腰椎滑脱患者超声检测的肌肉厚度变化,脊柱稳定运动并不优于屈曲运动。
简介:运动计划可以减轻退行性椎体滑脱和慢性腰痛患者的疼痛和改善功能。然而,对于运动引起的腰肌营养变化的任何特定常规的优越性仍然没有共识。目的是比较腰椎滑脱和慢性腰痛患者脊柱稳定运动和屈曲运动后原发性腰椎稳定肌厚度的变化。材料与方法:前瞻性研究、纵向研究和比较研究。21例诊断为慢性腰痛和退行性脊柱滑脱的50岁以上未接受治疗的患者被纳入研究。一位物理治疗师教参与者每天在家进行脊柱稳定练习或屈曲练习。在基线和三个月时,通过超声(静息和收缩时)测量初级腰肌的厚度。采用Mann-Whitney U检验和Wilcoxon符号秩检验进行比较,并计算Spearman秩相关系数。结果:我们没有发现运动方案之间的统计学差异:所有患者的多裂肌厚度都有显著变化,但其他评估的肌肉都没有变化。结论:3个月后脊柱稳定运动与屈曲运动在超声评价肌肉厚度变化方面无差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信