General practitioners' perceptions of the provision of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C within Australian private general practice: an exploratory qualitative study.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jane Scarborough, Paul Aylward, Emma Ruth Miller
{"title":"General practitioners' perceptions of the provision of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C within Australian private general practice: an exploratory qualitative study.","authors":"Jane Scarborough, Paul Aylward, Emma Ruth Miller","doi":"10.1071/PY22271","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a need to increase the involvement of Australian general practitioners (GPs) working in private practice to realise the potential of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatments for people with the hepatitis C virus.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2018 with seven GPs and two practice nurses working in private general practice to elicit the experiences and perceptions of their involvement in providing care for patients with hepatitis C virus in this setting. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed to inform interventions to maximise the provision of DAA in private general practice.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants described individual GPs purposely limiting their scope of clinical practice (SOCP) and expressed an expectation that DAA provision would not be included in all GP's SOCP. When GPs delineate their SOCP, their confidence to competently provide quality health care to their patients and GPs' professional special interests are important considerations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Providing DAA training, skill development, support and resources to GPs is necessary, but may not ensure that individual private GPs will provide this care. Where GPs do not include DAA in their SOCP, care pathways need to be developed for patients who will benefit from DAA, including GP-to-GP referral. These findings may be applicable to other areas of unmet need that rely on GPs including provision of care in their SOCP.</p>","PeriodicalId":8651,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of primary health","volume":" ","pages":"661-669"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of primary health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/PY22271","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a need to increase the involvement of Australian general practitioners (GPs) working in private practice to realise the potential of direct-acting antiviral (DAA) treatments for people with the hepatitis C virus.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2018 with seven GPs and two practice nurses working in private general practice to elicit the experiences and perceptions of their involvement in providing care for patients with hepatitis C virus in this setting. The interviews were recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed to inform interventions to maximise the provision of DAA in private general practice.

Results: Participants described individual GPs purposely limiting their scope of clinical practice (SOCP) and expressed an expectation that DAA provision would not be included in all GP's SOCP. When GPs delineate their SOCP, their confidence to competently provide quality health care to their patients and GPs' professional special interests are important considerations.

Conclusion: Providing DAA training, skill development, support and resources to GPs is necessary, but may not ensure that individual private GPs will provide this care. Where GPs do not include DAA in their SOCP, care pathways need to be developed for patients who will benefit from DAA, including GP-to-GP referral. These findings may be applicable to other areas of unmet need that rely on GPs including provision of care in their SOCP.

全科医生对澳大利亚私人全科诊所提供丙型肝炎直接作用抗病毒药物的看法:一项探索性定性研究。
背景:有必要提高澳大利亚私人全科医生(GPs)的参与度,以实现直接作用抗病毒(DAA)治疗丙型肝炎病毒感染者的潜力:2018年,对在私人全科诊所工作的7名全科医生和2名执业护士进行了半结构化访谈,以了解他们在这种环境下参与为丙型肝炎病毒感染者提供护理的经验和看法。对访谈进行了记录、转录和主题分析,以便为在私人全科诊所最大限度地提供 DAA 的干预措施提供信息:结果:参与者描述了个别全科医生有意限制其临床实践范围(SOCP)的情况,并表示期望DAA的提供不会被纳入所有全科医生的SOCP中。当全科医生划定他们的SOCP时,他们为患者提供优质医疗服务的信心以及全科医生的专业特殊兴趣是重要的考虑因素:结论:为全科医生提供 DAA 培训、技能发展、支持和资源是必要的,但可能无法确保个别私人全科医生提供这种护理。如果全科医生未将 DAA 纳入其 SOCP,则需要为将从 DAA 中受益的患者制定护理路径,包括全科医生之间的转诊。这些发现可能适用于其他依赖全科医生在其 SOCP 中提供护理的未满足需求领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian journal of primary health
Australian journal of primary health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
15.40%
发文量
136
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Australian Journal of Primary Health integrates the theory and practise of community health services and primary health care. The journal publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed research, reviews, policy reports and analyses from around the world. Articles cover a range of issues influencing community health services and primary health care, particularly comprehensive primary health care research, evidence-based practice (excluding discipline-specific clinical interventions) and primary health care policy issues. Australian Journal of Primary Health is an important international resource for all individuals and organisations involved in the planning, provision or practise of primary health care. Australian Journal of Primary Health is published by CSIRO Publishing on behalf of La Trobe University.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信