Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as an infection indicator in severe patients attending in the Emergency Department: a pilot study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q4 MICROBIOLOGY
M Encabo, E Hernández-Álvarez, D Oteo, A García-Álvarez, M Martínez-Novillo González, M T Sanz-Casla, J González-Del Castillo
{"title":"Monocyte distribution width (MDW) as an infection indicator in severe patients attending in the Emergency Department: a pilot study.","authors":"M Encabo,&nbsp;E Hernández-Álvarez,&nbsp;D Oteo,&nbsp;A García-Álvarez,&nbsp;M Martínez-Novillo González,&nbsp;M T Sanz-Casla,&nbsp;J González-Del Castillo","doi":"10.37201/req/108.2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a biomarker for sepsis diagnosis in severe patients attended in the Emergency Department for different conditions and not only infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed an observational study in a consecutive prospective cohort including severe patients attending the Emergency Department with different conditions. MDW and other biomarkers were determined from samples obtained during the first care of patients. The diagnostic performance of the different biomarkers was determined based on the final diagnosis at patient discharge.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred two patients, with a mean age of 76.7 (SD 16.5) years were included, 53 being (51.9%) male. Among the patients included, 65 (63.7%) had an infectious disease while the remaining had other different conditions. A MDW cut-off of 20.115 provided the best accuracy to identify infected patients, with a sensitivity of 89.2 (95% CI 79.4-94.7), a specificity of 89.2 (95% CI 75.3-95.7), a positive predictive value of 93.5 (95% CI 84.6-97.5), a negative predictive value of 82.5% (95% CI 68.0-91.3), a positive likelihood ratio of 8.25 (3.26-20.91), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.12 (0.06-0.24). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for infection according to MDW was 0.943 (95% CI 0.897-0.989; p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A MDW > 20.115 may be associated with infection and could help to distinguish between infected and non-infected patients in severe patients. These results must be confirmed in new studies due to the limited patient sample included.</p>","PeriodicalId":21232,"journal":{"name":"Revista Espanola De Quimioterapia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ab/99/revespquimioter-36-267.PMC10238791.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Espanola De Quimioterapia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37201/req/108.2022","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of monocyte distribution width (MDW) as a biomarker for sepsis diagnosis in severe patients attended in the Emergency Department for different conditions and not only infections.

Methods: We performed an observational study in a consecutive prospective cohort including severe patients attending the Emergency Department with different conditions. MDW and other biomarkers were determined from samples obtained during the first care of patients. The diagnostic performance of the different biomarkers was determined based on the final diagnosis at patient discharge.

Results: One hundred two patients, with a mean age of 76.7 (SD 16.5) years were included, 53 being (51.9%) male. Among the patients included, 65 (63.7%) had an infectious disease while the remaining had other different conditions. A MDW cut-off of 20.115 provided the best accuracy to identify infected patients, with a sensitivity of 89.2 (95% CI 79.4-94.7), a specificity of 89.2 (95% CI 75.3-95.7), a positive predictive value of 93.5 (95% CI 84.6-97.5), a negative predictive value of 82.5% (95% CI 68.0-91.3), a positive likelihood ratio of 8.25 (3.26-20.91), and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.12 (0.06-0.24). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for infection according to MDW was 0.943 (95% CI 0.897-0.989; p<0.001).

Conclusions: A MDW > 20.115 may be associated with infection and could help to distinguish between infected and non-infected patients in severe patients. These results must be confirmed in new studies due to the limited patient sample included.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

单核细胞分布宽度(MDW)作为急诊科重症患者感染指标:一项试点研究。
目的:本研究的目的是评估单核细胞分布宽度(MDW)作为诊断脓毒症的生物标志物在急诊科就诊的不同情况的严重患者中的诊断性能,而不仅仅是感染。方法:我们在一个连续的前瞻性队列中进行了一项观察性研究,包括在急诊科就诊的不同病情的重症患者。MDW和其他生物标志物从患者首次护理期间获得的样本中测定。根据患者出院时的最终诊断确定不同生物标志物的诊断性能。结果:纳入102例患者,平均年龄76.7岁(SD 16.5),男性53例(51.9%)。在纳入的患者中,65例(63.7%)患有传染病,其余患者患有其他不同疾病。MDW临界值为20.115,提供了识别感染患者的最佳准确性,敏感性为89.2 (95% CI 79.4-94.7),特异性为89.2 (95% CI 75.3-95.7),阳性预测值为93.5 (95% CI 84.6-97.5),阴性预测值为82.5% (95% CI 68.0-91.3),阳性似然比为8.25(3.26-20.91),阴性似然比为0.12(0.06-0.24)。MDW下感染受者工作特征曲线下面积为0.943 (95% CI 0.897-0.989;结论:MDW > 20.115可能与感染有关,可用于区分重症患者的感染与非感染。由于纳入的患者样本有限,这些结果必须在新的研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The official journal of the Sociedad Española de Quimioterapia (Spanish Society of Chemotherapy), publishes articles that further knowledge and advance the science and application of antimicrobial chemotherapy with antibiotics and antifungal, antiviral and antiprotozoal agents primarily in human medicine. Authors sign an exclusive license agreement, where authors have copyright but license exclusive rights in their article to the Publisher. All manuscripts are free open access. Revista Española de Quimioterapia includes the following sections: reviews, original articles, brierf reports, letters, and consensus documents.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信