Assay discrepancies using human coagulation factor VIII chromogenic kits: Results from a plasma-derived factor VIII collaborative study (BSP112).

Q4 Medicine
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes Pub Date : 2023-01-01
S Raut, A Daas, P Rigsby, A Costanzo
{"title":"Assay discrepancies using human coagulation factor VIII chromogenic kits: Results from a plasma-derived factor VIII collaborative study (BSP112).","authors":"S Raut,&nbsp;A Daas,&nbsp;P Rigsby,&nbsp;A Costanzo","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chromogenic assay discrepancies were reported at General European Official Medicines Control Laboratories Network (GEON) meetings by laboratories testing FVIII-products. The objectives of the present investigation were to carry out a controlled collaborative study to examine these reports and to delineate the reasons for these discrepancies by assessing affected and unaffected FVIII products. The laboratories followed a strict study protocol, which included assessing their own individual observed factor X (FX) activation times, i.e. the time to reach 50% of maximal FX activation (T<sub>1/2</sub>), for each chromogenic kit. This measurement was used, in parallel with the kit manufacturers' prescribed FX activation times, to assess the performance of the chromogenic potency assays on FVIII test products. This study confirmed a significant discrepancy between Coatest® and Coamatic® kits and between Siemens and Coamatic® kits when the kit manufacturers' prescribed T<sub>1/2</sub> incubation times were followed. Coamatic® kits tended to produce higher potencies than the Coatest® or Siemens kits. Furthermore, FX activation assays revealed marked differences between individual laboratories for all three chromogenic kits in the observed T<sub>1/2</sub> incubation times, which also did not correspond to the prescribed T<sub>1/2</sub> incubation times. The resulting differences in potency between kits, in some cases, were significantly reduced when using the actual observed T<sub>1/2</sub> incubation times instead of the prescribed T<sub>1/2</sub> incubation times. The study showed that FVIII potency discrepancies can occur between chromogenic kits. To compensate for this, laboratories should ideally perform FX activation curves for each new chromogenic kit in order to determine the correct observed T<sub>1/2</sub> incubation times, which can then be used to determine FVIII potencies in therapeutic concentrates.</p>","PeriodicalId":39192,"journal":{"name":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","volume":"2023 ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chromogenic assay discrepancies were reported at General European Official Medicines Control Laboratories Network (GEON) meetings by laboratories testing FVIII-products. The objectives of the present investigation were to carry out a controlled collaborative study to examine these reports and to delineate the reasons for these discrepancies by assessing affected and unaffected FVIII products. The laboratories followed a strict study protocol, which included assessing their own individual observed factor X (FX) activation times, i.e. the time to reach 50% of maximal FX activation (T1/2), for each chromogenic kit. This measurement was used, in parallel with the kit manufacturers' prescribed FX activation times, to assess the performance of the chromogenic potency assays on FVIII test products. This study confirmed a significant discrepancy between Coatest® and Coamatic® kits and between Siemens and Coamatic® kits when the kit manufacturers' prescribed T1/2 incubation times were followed. Coamatic® kits tended to produce higher potencies than the Coatest® or Siemens kits. Furthermore, FX activation assays revealed marked differences between individual laboratories for all three chromogenic kits in the observed T1/2 incubation times, which also did not correspond to the prescribed T1/2 incubation times. The resulting differences in potency between kits, in some cases, were significantly reduced when using the actual observed T1/2 incubation times instead of the prescribed T1/2 incubation times. The study showed that FVIII potency discrepancies can occur between chromogenic kits. To compensate for this, laboratories should ideally perform FX activation curves for each new chromogenic kit in order to determine the correct observed T1/2 incubation times, which can then be used to determine FVIII potencies in therapeutic concentrates.

使用人凝血因子VIII显色试剂盒的测定差异:来自血浆源性因子VIII合作研究的结果(BSP112)。
在欧洲官方药品控制实验室网络(GEON)会议上,检测fviii产品的实验室报告了显色分析差异。本研究的目的是开展一项对照合作研究,以检查这些报告,并通过评估受影响和未受影响的FVIII产品来描述这些差异的原因。实验室遵循严格的研究方案,包括评估每个显色试剂盒各自观察到的因子X (FX)激活时间,即达到最大因子X激活(T1/2) 50%的时间。该测量与试剂盒制造商规定的FX激活时间同时使用,以评估FVIII测试产品显色效价测定的性能。本研究证实,当遵循试剂盒制造商规定的T1/2孵育时间时,Coatest®和Coamatic®试剂盒之间以及Siemens和Coamatic®试剂盒之间存在显著差异。Coamatic套件倾向于产生比Coatest®或Siemens套件更高的效力。此外,FX激活试验显示,在观察到的T1/2孵育时间中,所有三种显色试剂盒在各个实验室之间存在显着差异,这也不符合规定的T1/2孵育时间。在某些情况下,当使用实际观察到的T1/2孵育时间而不是规定的T1/2孵育时间时,试剂盒之间的效价差异显着降低。研究表明,显色试剂盒之间可能存在FVIII效价差异。为了弥补这一点,实验室应该理想地为每个新的显色试剂盒执行FX激活曲线,以确定正确观察到的T1/2孵育时间,然后可用于确定治疗浓缩物中的FVIII效力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes
Pharmeuropa bio & scientific notes Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信