Elizabeth Crouch PhD, Joni Nelson PhD, Elizabeth Radcliff PhD, Melinda A. Merrell PhD, MPH, Amy Martin DrPH
{"title":"Safe, supportive neighborhoods: Are they associated with childhood oral health?","authors":"Elizabeth Crouch PhD, Joni Nelson PhD, Elizabeth Radcliff PhD, Melinda A. Merrell PhD, MPH, Amy Martin DrPH","doi":"10.1111/jphd.12541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>There has been limited examination of how community-level supports may influence oral health metrics among children. The purpose of our study is to examine the association between two types of community-level positive childhood experiences and oral healthcare and oral health outcomes among children ages 6 to 17 years of age.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study uses a cross-sectional data set from the 2018–2019 National Survey of Children's Health. Two oral health metrics were used: preventive dental care, measured as one or more preventive dental visits in the past 12 months, and tooth decay, measured as tooth decay or cavities in the last 12 months. To quantify living in safe, stable, equitable environments, questions on residing in a safe and supportive neighborhood were used. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were used to calculate frequencies, proportions, and unadjusted associations for each variable (<i>n</i> = 40,290). Multivariable logistic regression models were used.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>In an adjusted analysis, children who lived in a supportive neighborhood had a higher likelihood of receiving a preventive dental visit than children who did not live in a supportive neighborhood (aOR 1.41; 95% CI 1.21–1.65). Children who lived in a safe neighborhood were less likely to have tooth decay than children who did not live in a safe neighborhood (aOR 0.75; 95% CI 0.65–0.86).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings from this study highlight the role of social structures in tightening the safety net for oral healthcare in children.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16913,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health dentistry","volume":"83 1","pages":"9-17"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jphd.12541","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jphd.12541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
There has been limited examination of how community-level supports may influence oral health metrics among children. The purpose of our study is to examine the association between two types of community-level positive childhood experiences and oral healthcare and oral health outcomes among children ages 6 to 17 years of age.
Methods
This study uses a cross-sectional data set from the 2018–2019 National Survey of Children's Health. Two oral health metrics were used: preventive dental care, measured as one or more preventive dental visits in the past 12 months, and tooth decay, measured as tooth decay or cavities in the last 12 months. To quantify living in safe, stable, equitable environments, questions on residing in a safe and supportive neighborhood were used. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses were used to calculate frequencies, proportions, and unadjusted associations for each variable (n = 40,290). Multivariable logistic regression models were used.
Results
In an adjusted analysis, children who lived in a supportive neighborhood had a higher likelihood of receiving a preventive dental visit than children who did not live in a supportive neighborhood (aOR 1.41; 95% CI 1.21–1.65). Children who lived in a safe neighborhood were less likely to have tooth decay than children who did not live in a safe neighborhood (aOR 0.75; 95% CI 0.65–0.86).
Conclusions
The findings from this study highlight the role of social structures in tightening the safety net for oral healthcare in children.
目的关于社区支持如何影响儿童口腔健康指标的研究有限。本研究旨在探讨6至17岁儿童的两种社区层面的积极童年经历与口腔保健和口腔健康结果之间的关系。方法本研究使用2018-2019年全国儿童健康调查的横断面数据集。研究使用了两种口腔健康指标:预防性牙科护理,以过去12个月的一次或多次预防性牙科就诊来衡量,以及蛀牙,以过去12个月的蛀牙或蛀牙来衡量。为了量化生活在安全、稳定、公平的环境中,使用了居住在安全和支持性社区的问题。描述性统计和双变量分析用于计算每个变量的频率、比例和未调整的关联(n = 40,290)。采用多变量logistic回归模型。结果在一项调整分析中,生活在支持性社区的儿童比没有生活在支持性社区的儿童接受预防性牙科就诊的可能性更高(aOR 1.41;95% ci 1.21-1.65)。生活在安全社区的儿童比没有生活在安全社区的儿童更不容易蛀牙(aOR 0.75;95% ci 0.65-0.86)。结论本研究结果强调了社会结构在加强儿童口腔保健安全网中的作用。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Public Health Dentistry is devoted to the advancement of public health dentistry through the exploration of related research, practice, and policy developments. Three main types of articles are published: original research articles that provide a significant contribution to knowledge in the breadth of dental public health, including oral epidemiology, dental health services, the behavioral sciences, and the public health practice areas of assessment, policy development, and assurance; methods articles that report the development and testing of new approaches to research design, data collection and analysis, or the delivery of public health services; and review articles that synthesize previous research in the discipline and provide guidance to others conducting research as well as to policy makers, managers, and other dental public health practitioners.