Predicting 30-day readmission following total knee arthroplasty using machine learning and clinical expertise applied to clinical administrative and research registry data in an Australian cohort.

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Daniel J Gould, James A Bailey, Tim Spelman, Samantha Bunzli, Michelle M Dowsey, Peter F M Choong
{"title":"Predicting 30-day readmission following total knee arthroplasty using machine learning and clinical expertise applied to clinical administrative and research registry data in an Australian cohort.","authors":"Daniel J Gould,&nbsp;James A Bailey,&nbsp;Tim Spelman,&nbsp;Samantha Bunzli,&nbsp;Michelle M Dowsey,&nbsp;Peter F M Choong","doi":"10.1186/s42836-023-00186-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Thirty-day readmission is an increasingly important problem for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The aim of this study was to develop a risk prediction model using machine learning and clinical insight for 30-day readmission in primary TKA patients.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Data used to train and internally validate a multivariable predictive model were obtained from a single tertiary referral centre for TKA located in Victoria, Australia. Hospital administrative data and clinical registry data were utilised, and predictors were selected through systematic review and subsequent consultation with clinicians caring for TKA patients. Logistic regression and random forest models were compared to one another. Calibration was evaluated by visual inspection of calibration curves and calculation of the integrated calibration index (ICI). Discriminative performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The models developed in this study demonstrated adequate calibration for use in the clinical setting, despite having poor discriminative performance. The best-calibrated readmission prediction model was a logistic regression model trained on administrative data using risk factors identified from systematic review and meta-analysis, which are available at the initial consultation (ICI = 0.012, AUC-ROC = 0.589). Models developed to predict complications associated with readmission also had reasonable calibration (ICI = 0.012, AUC-ROC = 0.658).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Discriminative performance of the prediction models was poor, although machine learning provided a slight improvement. The models were reasonably well calibrated, meaning they provide accurate patient-specific probabilities of these outcomes. This information can be used in shared clinical decision-making for discharge planning and post-discharge follow up.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10234041/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42836-023-00186-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Thirty-day readmission is an increasingly important problem for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) patients. The aim of this study was to develop a risk prediction model using machine learning and clinical insight for 30-day readmission in primary TKA patients.

Method: Data used to train and internally validate a multivariable predictive model were obtained from a single tertiary referral centre for TKA located in Victoria, Australia. Hospital administrative data and clinical registry data were utilised, and predictors were selected through systematic review and subsequent consultation with clinicians caring for TKA patients. Logistic regression and random forest models were compared to one another. Calibration was evaluated by visual inspection of calibration curves and calculation of the integrated calibration index (ICI). Discriminative performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).

Results: The models developed in this study demonstrated adequate calibration for use in the clinical setting, despite having poor discriminative performance. The best-calibrated readmission prediction model was a logistic regression model trained on administrative data using risk factors identified from systematic review and meta-analysis, which are available at the initial consultation (ICI = 0.012, AUC-ROC = 0.589). Models developed to predict complications associated with readmission also had reasonable calibration (ICI = 0.012, AUC-ROC = 0.658).

Conclusion: Discriminative performance of the prediction models was poor, although machine learning provided a slight improvement. The models were reasonably well calibrated, meaning they provide accurate patient-specific probabilities of these outcomes. This information can be used in shared clinical decision-making for discharge planning and post-discharge follow up.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

利用机器学习和临床专业知识预测全膝关节置换术后30天的再入院情况,应用于澳大利亚队列的临床管理和研究登记数据。
背景:30天再入院是全膝关节置换术(TKA)患者日益重要的问题。本研究的目的是利用机器学习和临床洞察开发原发性TKA患者30天再入院的风险预测模型。方法:用于训练和内部验证多变量预测模型的数据是从位于澳大利亚维多利亚州的TKA单一三级转诊中心获得的。利用医院管理数据和临床登记数据,并通过系统评价和随后与照顾TKA患者的临床医生协商选择预测因子。对Logistic回归模型和随机森林模型进行了比较。通过目测校准曲线和计算综合校准指数(ICI)来评估校准。采用受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC-ROC)评价鉴别性能。结果:在本研究中开发的模型证明了在临床环境中使用的适当校准,尽管具有较差的判别性能。最佳校准的再入院预测模型是一个逻辑回归模型,该模型使用从系统评价和荟萃分析中确定的风险因素进行管理数据训练,这些风险因素在初次咨询时可用(ICI = 0.012, AUC-ROC = 0.589)。用于预测再入院并发症的模型也有合理的校准(ICI = 0.012, AUC-ROC = 0.658)。结论:预测模型的判别性能较差,尽管机器学习提供了轻微的改进。这些模型经过了相当好的校准,这意味着它们提供了这些结果的准确的患者特定概率。该信息可用于共享临床决策的出院计划和出院后随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信