Comparison of electromyographic activity of the gluteal muscles and tensor fascia lata in persons with patellofemoral pain: evaluation of selected, hip-targeted exercises using indwelling fine-wire electrodes.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-22 DOI:10.1080/09593985.2023.2215389
David M Selkowitz, George J Beneck, Christopher M Powers
{"title":"Comparison of electromyographic activity of the gluteal muscles and tensor fascia lata in persons with patellofemoral pain: evaluation of selected, hip-targeted exercises using indwelling fine-wire electrodes.","authors":"David M Selkowitz, George J Beneck, Christopher M Powers","doi":"10.1080/09593985.2023.2215389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Excessive hip adduction and internal rotation are common movement impairments associated with patellofemoral pain (PFP). As such, strengthening of the hip abductors and external rotators commonly is recommended. Because tensor fascia latae (TFL) is a hip internal rotator in addition to being an abductor, it is important to select exercises that target the superior gluteus maximus (SUP-GMAX) and gluteus medius (GMED) while minimizing activation of the TFL.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify hip-targeted exercises resulting in greater activation of the SUP-GMAX and GMED relative to the TFL in persons with PFP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twelve individuals with PFP participated. Electromyographic (EMG) signals were obtained from the GMED, SUP-GMAX, and TFL using fine-wire electrodes while participants performed 11 hip-targeted exercises. Normalized EMG of GMED and SUP-GMAX was compared to that of the TFL for each exercise using repeated measures ANOVAs and descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 11 hip exercises evaluated, only the clam exercise with elastic resistance resulted in significantly greater activity of both gluteal muscles (SUP-GMAX = 24.2 ± 14.4%MVIC, <i>p</i> = .05; GMED = 37.2 ± 19.7%MVIC, <i>p</i> = .008) relative to the TFL (12.5 ± 11.7%MVIC). Five exercises exhibited significantly lower activation of SUP-GMAX relative to TFL: 1) unilateral bridge: SUP-GMAX = 17.7 ± 9.8%MVIC, TFL = 34.0 ± 17.7%MVIC, <i>p</i> = .01; 2) bilateral bridge: SUP-GMAX = 10.0 ± 6.9%MVIC, TFL = 14.0 ± 7.5%MVIC, <i>p</i> = .04; 3) abduction: SUP-GMAX = 14.2 ± 11.1%MVIC, TFL = 33.0 ± 11.9%MVIC, <i>p</i> = .001; 4) hip hike: SUP-GMAX = 14.8 ± 12.8%MVIC, TFL = 46.8 ± 33.7%MVIC, <i>p</i> = .008; and 5) step-up: SUP-GMAX = 15.0 ± 5.4%MVIC, TFL = 31.7 ± 19.9 %MVIC, <i>p</i> = .02). No differences in gluteal activation relative to TFL were found for the remaining 6 exercises (all <i>p</i> > .05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The clam with elastic resistance exercise was effective at activating the SUP-GMAX and GMED greater than TFL. No other exercises achieved a similar level of muscular recruitment. When attempting to strengthen the gluteal muscles in persons with PFP, care should be taken in assuming that common hip-targeted exercises result in the desired recruitment patterns.</p>","PeriodicalId":48699,"journal":{"name":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiotherapy Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593985.2023.2215389","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Excessive hip adduction and internal rotation are common movement impairments associated with patellofemoral pain (PFP). As such, strengthening of the hip abductors and external rotators commonly is recommended. Because tensor fascia latae (TFL) is a hip internal rotator in addition to being an abductor, it is important to select exercises that target the superior gluteus maximus (SUP-GMAX) and gluteus medius (GMED) while minimizing activation of the TFL.

Objective: To identify hip-targeted exercises resulting in greater activation of the SUP-GMAX and GMED relative to the TFL in persons with PFP.

Methods: Twelve individuals with PFP participated. Electromyographic (EMG) signals were obtained from the GMED, SUP-GMAX, and TFL using fine-wire electrodes while participants performed 11 hip-targeted exercises. Normalized EMG of GMED and SUP-GMAX was compared to that of the TFL for each exercise using repeated measures ANOVAs and descriptive statistics.

Results: Of the 11 hip exercises evaluated, only the clam exercise with elastic resistance resulted in significantly greater activity of both gluteal muscles (SUP-GMAX = 24.2 ± 14.4%MVIC, p = .05; GMED = 37.2 ± 19.7%MVIC, p = .008) relative to the TFL (12.5 ± 11.7%MVIC). Five exercises exhibited significantly lower activation of SUP-GMAX relative to TFL: 1) unilateral bridge: SUP-GMAX = 17.7 ± 9.8%MVIC, TFL = 34.0 ± 17.7%MVIC, p = .01; 2) bilateral bridge: SUP-GMAX = 10.0 ± 6.9%MVIC, TFL = 14.0 ± 7.5%MVIC, p = .04; 3) abduction: SUP-GMAX = 14.2 ± 11.1%MVIC, TFL = 33.0 ± 11.9%MVIC, p = .001; 4) hip hike: SUP-GMAX = 14.8 ± 12.8%MVIC, TFL = 46.8 ± 33.7%MVIC, p = .008; and 5) step-up: SUP-GMAX = 15.0 ± 5.4%MVIC, TFL = 31.7 ± 19.9 %MVIC, p = .02). No differences in gluteal activation relative to TFL were found for the remaining 6 exercises (all p > .05).

Conclusion: The clam with elastic resistance exercise was effective at activating the SUP-GMAX and GMED greater than TFL. No other exercises achieved a similar level of muscular recruitment. When attempting to strengthen the gluteal muscles in persons with PFP, care should be taken in assuming that common hip-targeted exercises result in the desired recruitment patterns.

髌骨股骨痛患者臀部肌肉和筋膜张力肌电图活动的比较:使用留置细线电极对选定的臀部目标运动进行评估。
简介髋关节过度内收和内旋是与髌骨股骨痛(PFP)相关的常见运动障碍。因此,通常建议加强髋关节内收和外旋肌的锻炼。由于张肌筋膜(TFL)除了是内收肌外,还是髋关节内旋肌,因此选择针对臀大肌上部(SUP-GMAX)和臀中肌(GMED)的练习非常重要,同时要尽量减少对张肌筋膜的激活:目的:确定以髋关节为目标的锻炼方法,从而使PFP患者的臀大肌(SUP-GMAX)和臀中肌(GMED)相对于TFL得到更大的激活:方法:12 名 PFP 患者参加。在参与者进行 11 项髋关节目标运动时,使用细线电极从 GMED、SUP-GMAX 和 TFL 获取肌电图(EMG)信号。使用重复测量方差分析和描述性统计将 GMED 和 SUP-GMAX 的归一化 EMG 与 TFL 的归一化 EMG 进行比较:结果:在所评估的 11 项髋关节练习中,只有蛤蜊弹性阻力练习导致臀部两块肌肉(SUP-GMAX = 24.2 ± 14.4%MVIC, p = .05;GMED = 37.2 ± 19.7%MVIC, p = .008)的活动明显多于 TFL(12.5 ± 11.7%MVIC)。相对于 TFL,有五项练习显示 SUP-GMAX 的激活率明显较低:1) 单侧桥式:1) 单侧桥:SUP-GMAX = 17.7 ± 9.8%MVIC, TFL = 34.0 ± 17.7%MVIC, p = .01;2) 双侧桥:SUP-GMAX = 10.0 ± 6.9%MVIC, TFL = 14.0 ± 7.5%MVIC, p = .04;3)外展:SUP-GMAX = 14.2 ± 11.1%MVIC, TFL = 33.0 ± 11.9%MVIC, p = .001;4)臀部远足:SUP-GMAX = 14.8 ± 12.8%MVIC, TFL = 46.8 ± 33.7%MVIC, p = .008;以及 5) 上台阶:SUP-GMAX = 15.0 ± 5.4%MVIC, TFL = 31.7 ± 19.9%MVIC, p = .02)。在其余 6 项练习中,臀部激活相对于 TFL 没有发现差异(所有 p > .05):结论:带弹性阻力的蛤蜊运动能有效激活 SUP-GMAX 和 GMED,其激活程度高于 TFL。结论:蛤蜊弹力阻力练习能有效激活 SUP-GMAX 和 GMED,且激活程度大于 TFL,其他练习均无法达到类似的肌肉激活水平。在尝试增强 PFP 患者的臀部肌肉时,应谨慎假设常见的髋关节目标练习能产生所需的募集模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: The aim of Physiotherapy Theory and Practice is to provide an international, peer-reviewed forum for the publication, dissemination, and discussion of recent developments and current research in physiotherapy/physical therapy. The journal accepts original quantitative and qualitative research reports, theoretical papers, systematic literature reviews, clinical case reports, and technical clinical notes. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice; promotes post-basic education through reports, reviews, and updates on all aspects of physiotherapy and specialties relating to clinical physiotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信