From resilient girls to (more) resilient women: A mixed-methods study examining narratives of resilience among South African young women.

IF 0.7 Q4 FAMILY STUDIES
Ashleigh LoVette, Abigail Harrison, Catherine Mathews, Kim Jonas, Don Operario, Caroline Kuo
{"title":"From resilient girls to (more) resilient women: A mixed-methods study examining narratives of resilience among South African young women.","authors":"Ashleigh LoVette, Abigail Harrison, Catherine Mathews, Kim Jonas, Don Operario, Caroline Kuo","doi":"10.1080/17450128.2022.2124339","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adolescence and emerging adulthood are times of heightened adversity for South African girls and young women due to structural disadvantage. In this mixed-methods study, we explored lived experiences of resilience among a sample of 377 South African girls and young women (15-24 years) who completed a quantitative cross-sectional survey that included a validated measure of resilience. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and an independent sample t-test to assess differences in resilience. These analyses informed the development of a semi-structured qualitative interview agenda. A purposive sample of 21 South African girls and young women (15-24 years) from the same survey area participated in in-depth interviews. Interviews were analyzed for perceptions of difference in resilience by age and narratives of resilience during transitions to adulthood. Survey results indicated younger participants (15-17 years) perceived themselves to be less resilient than older participants (18-24 years). Qualitative interview results supported the survey results, and pointed to a broader difference in perceived resilience between younger women and older women. Programming and policy implications for future resilience research among this population are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":46101,"journal":{"name":"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies","volume":"18 2","pages":"218-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10193273/pdf/nihms-1866139.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2022.2124339","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Adolescence and emerging adulthood are times of heightened adversity for South African girls and young women due to structural disadvantage. In this mixed-methods study, we explored lived experiences of resilience among a sample of 377 South African girls and young women (15-24 years) who completed a quantitative cross-sectional survey that included a validated measure of resilience. Quantitative analyses included descriptive statistics and an independent sample t-test to assess differences in resilience. These analyses informed the development of a semi-structured qualitative interview agenda. A purposive sample of 21 South African girls and young women (15-24 years) from the same survey area participated in in-depth interviews. Interviews were analyzed for perceptions of difference in resilience by age and narratives of resilience during transitions to adulthood. Survey results indicated younger participants (15-17 years) perceived themselves to be less resilient than older participants (18-24 years). Qualitative interview results supported the survey results, and pointed to a broader difference in perceived resilience between younger women and older women. Programming and policy implications for future resilience research among this population are discussed.

从坚韧不拔的女孩到(更)坚韧不拔的妇女:对南非年轻女性复原力叙述的混合方法研究。
由于结构上的劣势,对于南非女孩和年轻女性来说,青春期和成年期是逆境加剧的时期。在这项混合方法研究中,我们探讨了 377 名南非女孩和年轻女性(15-24 岁)的抗逆力生活经历,她们完成了一项定量横截面调查,其中包括一项经过验证的抗逆力测量方法。定量分析包括描述性统计和独立样本 t 检验,以评估复原力的差异。这些分析为制定半结构化定性访谈议程提供了依据。来自同一调查地区的 21 名南非女孩和年轻女性(15-24 岁)参加了深度访谈。对访谈内容进行了分析,以了解不同年龄段对抗逆能力差异的看法,以及在向成年过渡期间对抗逆能力的叙述。调查结果显示,与年龄较大的参与者(18-24 岁)相比,年龄较小的参与者(15-17 岁)认为自己的抗挫折能力较弱。定性访谈的结果支持了调查结果,并指出年轻女性和年长女性在抗逆力方面存在更广泛的差异。本文讨论了未来在这一人群中开展复原力研究的计划和政策影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies is an essential peer-reviewed journal analyzing psychological, sociological, health, gender, cultural, economic, and educational aspects of children and adolescents in developed and developing countries. This international publication forum provides a much-needed interdisciplinary focus on vulnerable children and youth at risk, specifically in relation to health and welfare issues, such as mental health, illness (including HIV/AIDS), disability, abuse, neglect, institutionalization, poverty, orphanhood, exploitation, war, famine, and disaster.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信