Self-interest or joint welfare? Person and situation factors in interpersonal decisions about time

IF 2.3 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Johannes Leder, Philina Bartkowiak, Laura K. Niedermanner, Astrid Schütz, Katrin Rentzsch
{"title":"Self-interest or joint welfare? Person and situation factors in interpersonal decisions about time","authors":"Johannes Leder,&nbsp;Philina Bartkowiak,&nbsp;Laura K. Niedermanner,&nbsp;Astrid Schütz,&nbsp;Katrin Rentzsch","doi":"10.1002/jts5.56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>While previous research on interpersonal decisions has focused on individual differences or situational determinants, in this paper, we looked at the interplay of situation and personality in decisions that are characterized by a conflict between self-interest and joint welfare. In an online experiment, 185 participants made decisions about the allocation of their own work time and the work time of another anonymous participant. Agency and uncertainty were manipulated between subjects, and social value orientation as well as dispositional envy were assessed. Participants chose between an option that maximized participants' joint welfare and an option that maximized personal payoffs. The results pointed to an interaction between personality and situational forces: Uncertainty moderated the effect of social value orientation, and agency moderated the effect of envy on decisions. Taken together, the results provide evidence that the effect of individual differences in interpersonal decisions depends on the situation. Implications for team work are discussed in situations where a group potentially benefits disproportionally more from an individual's relatively higher effort than the individual who exerts the effort.</p>","PeriodicalId":36271,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","volume":"4 1","pages":"32-42"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/jts5.56","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jts5.56","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

While previous research on interpersonal decisions has focused on individual differences or situational determinants, in this paper, we looked at the interplay of situation and personality in decisions that are characterized by a conflict between self-interest and joint welfare. In an online experiment, 185 participants made decisions about the allocation of their own work time and the work time of another anonymous participant. Agency and uncertainty were manipulated between subjects, and social value orientation as well as dispositional envy were assessed. Participants chose between an option that maximized participants' joint welfare and an option that maximized personal payoffs. The results pointed to an interaction between personality and situational forces: Uncertainty moderated the effect of social value orientation, and agency moderated the effect of envy on decisions. Taken together, the results provide evidence that the effect of individual differences in interpersonal decisions depends on the situation. Implications for team work are discussed in situations where a group potentially benefits disproportionally more from an individual's relatively higher effort than the individual who exerts the effort.

Abstract Image

自利还是共同福利?人际时间决策中的个人和情境因素
之前关于人际决策的研究主要集中在个体差异或情境决定因素上,而在本文中,我们研究了情境和人格在以自身利益和共同福利之间的冲突为特征的决策中的相互作用。在一项在线实验中,185名参与者决定分配自己的工作时间和另一位匿名参与者的工作时间。在被试之间操纵能动性和不确定性,评估社会价值取向和性格嫉妒。参与者在使共同福利最大化的选项和使个人收益最大化的选项之间做出选择。结果表明,人格和情境力量之间存在相互作用:不确定性调节了社会价值取向的影响,能动性调节了嫉妒对决策的影响。综上所述,这些结果证明了个体差异对人际决策的影响取决于情境。对于团队工作的影响,我们讨论的情况是,一个群体从个人相对较高的努力中获得的潜在利益比付出努力的个人获得的利益不成比例地多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology
Journal of Theoretical Social Psychology Psychology-Social Psychology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信