Wildfire smoke exposure and emergency department visits in Washington State.

Environmental research, health : ERH Pub Date : 2023-06-01 Epub Date: 2023-05-25 DOI:10.1088/2752-5309/acd3a1
Annie Doubleday, Lianne Sheppard, Elena Austin, Tania Busch Isaksen
{"title":"Wildfire smoke exposure and emergency department visits in Washington State.","authors":"Annie Doubleday, Lianne Sheppard, Elena Austin, Tania Busch Isaksen","doi":"10.1088/2752-5309/acd3a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wildfires are increasing in prevalence in western North America due to changing climate conditions. A growing number of studies examine the impact of wildfire smoke on morbidity; however, few evaluate these impacts using syndromic surveillance data that cover many emergency departments (EDs). We used syndromic surveillance data to explore the effect of wildfire smoke exposure on all-cause respiratory and cardiovascular ED visits in Washington state. Using a time-stratified case crossover design, we observed an increased odds of asthma visits immediately after and in all five days following initial exposure (lag 0 OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.17; lag 1-5 ORs all 1.05 or greater with a lower CI of 1.02 or higher), and an increased odds of respiratory visits in all five days following initial exposure (lag 1 OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.03; lag 2-5 ORs and lower CIs were all at least as large) comparing wildfire smoke to non-wildfire smoke days. We observed mixed results for cardiovascular visits, with evidence of increased odds emerging only several days following initial exposure. We also found increased odds across all visit categories for a 10 <i>μ</i>g m<sup>-3</sup> increase in smoke-impacted PM<sub>2.5</sub>. In stratified analyses, we observed elevated odds for respiratory visits among ages 19-64, for asthma visits among ages 5-64, and mixed risk estimates for cardiovascular visits by age group. This study provides evidence of an increased risk of respiratory ED visits immediately following initial wildfire smoke exposure, and increased risk of cardiovascular ED visits several days following initial exposure. These increased risks are seen particularly among children and younger to middle-aged adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":72938,"journal":{"name":"Environmental research, health : ERH","volume":"1 2","pages":"025006"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10213826/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental research, health : ERH","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2752-5309/acd3a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/5/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wildfires are increasing in prevalence in western North America due to changing climate conditions. A growing number of studies examine the impact of wildfire smoke on morbidity; however, few evaluate these impacts using syndromic surveillance data that cover many emergency departments (EDs). We used syndromic surveillance data to explore the effect of wildfire smoke exposure on all-cause respiratory and cardiovascular ED visits in Washington state. Using a time-stratified case crossover design, we observed an increased odds of asthma visits immediately after and in all five days following initial exposure (lag 0 OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 1.10, 1.17; lag 1-5 ORs all 1.05 or greater with a lower CI of 1.02 or higher), and an increased odds of respiratory visits in all five days following initial exposure (lag 1 OR: 1.02; 95% CI: 1.00, 1.03; lag 2-5 ORs and lower CIs were all at least as large) comparing wildfire smoke to non-wildfire smoke days. We observed mixed results for cardiovascular visits, with evidence of increased odds emerging only several days following initial exposure. We also found increased odds across all visit categories for a 10 μg m-3 increase in smoke-impacted PM2.5. In stratified analyses, we observed elevated odds for respiratory visits among ages 19-64, for asthma visits among ages 5-64, and mixed risk estimates for cardiovascular visits by age group. This study provides evidence of an increased risk of respiratory ED visits immediately following initial wildfire smoke exposure, and increased risk of cardiovascular ED visits several days following initial exposure. These increased risks are seen particularly among children and younger to middle-aged adults.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

华盛顿州的野火烟雾暴露和急诊就诊情况。
由于气候条件的变化,野火在北美西部越来越普遍。越来越多的研究探讨了野火烟雾对发病率的影响;然而,很少有研究利用涵盖许多急诊科(ED)的综合征监测数据来评估这些影响。我们利用综合症监测数据来探讨野火烟雾暴露对华盛顿州全因呼吸道和心血管疾病急诊就诊的影响。通过采用时间分层病例交叉设计,我们观察到哮喘就诊的几率在首次暴露后的第一时间和所有五天内都有所增加(滞后 0 OR:1.13;95% CI:1.10, 1.17;滞后 1-5 OR 均为 1.05 或更高,较低的 CI 为 1.02 或更高)。02或更高),而在最初接触烟雾后的所有五天内,呼吸系统就诊的几率增加(滞后1 OR:1.02;95% CI:1.00, 1.03;滞后2-5 ORs和较低的CIs都至少一样大),将野火烟雾日与非野火烟雾日进行比较。我们观察到的心血管就诊结果好坏参半,只有在最初接触烟雾几天后才出现几率增加的证据。我们还发现,在所有就诊类别中,烟雾影响的 PM2.5 每增加 10 μg m-3 的几率都会增加。在分层分析中,我们观察到 19-64 岁人群呼吸系统就诊几率升高,5-64 岁人群哮喘就诊几率升高,各年龄组心血管就诊风险估计值不一。这项研究提供的证据表明,在初次接触野火烟雾后,呼吸系统急诊就诊的风险会立即增加,而在初次接触烟雾几天后,心血管急诊就诊的风险也会增加。这些增加的风险在儿童和中青年中尤为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信