Implementation of Early Rehabilitation in Severe COVID-19 Respiratory Failure: A Scoping Review.

IF 0.5 Q4 REHABILITATION
Daniel Miner, Kellen Smith, Mahtab Foroozesh, Justin H Price
{"title":"Implementation of Early Rehabilitation in Severe COVID-19 Respiratory Failure: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Daniel Miner,&nbsp;Kellen Smith,&nbsp;Mahtab Foroozesh,&nbsp;Justin H Price","doi":"10.1097/JAT.0000000000000204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this scoping review is to describe current clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for early rehabilitation for individuals hospitalized in an intensive care unit with COVID-19 and examine practice patterns for implementation of mobility-related interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases were searched from January 1, 2020, through April 1, 2022. Selected studies included individuals hospitalized with severe COVID-19 and provided objective criteria for clinical decision making for mobility interventions. A total of 1464 publications were assessed for eligibility and data extraction. The PRISMA-ScR Checklist and established guidelines for reporting for scoping reviews were followed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twelve articles met inclusion criteria: 5 CPGs and 7 implementation articles. Objective clinical criteria and guidelines for implementation of early rehabilitation demonstrated variable agreement across systems. No significant adverse events were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Sixty percent (3/5) of CPGs restrict mobility for individuals requiring ventilatory support of more than 60% Fio<sub>2</sub> (fraction of inspired oxygen) and/or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) greater than 10-cm H<sub>2</sub>O (positive end-expiratory pressure). Preliminary evidence from implementation studies may suggest that some individuals with COVID-19 requiring enhanced ventilatory support outside of established parameters may be able to safely participate in mobility-related interventions, though further research is needed to determine safety and feasibility to guide clinical decision making.</p>","PeriodicalId":42472,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10032217/pdf/jat-14-63.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Acute Care Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JAT.0000000000000204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The purpose of this scoping review is to describe current clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for early rehabilitation for individuals hospitalized in an intensive care unit with COVID-19 and examine practice patterns for implementation of mobility-related interventions.

Methods: PubMed, EMBASE, and CINAHL databases were searched from January 1, 2020, through April 1, 2022. Selected studies included individuals hospitalized with severe COVID-19 and provided objective criteria for clinical decision making for mobility interventions. A total of 1464 publications were assessed for eligibility and data extraction. The PRISMA-ScR Checklist and established guidelines for reporting for scoping reviews were followed.

Results: Twelve articles met inclusion criteria: 5 CPGs and 7 implementation articles. Objective clinical criteria and guidelines for implementation of early rehabilitation demonstrated variable agreement across systems. No significant adverse events were reported.

Conclusions: Sixty percent (3/5) of CPGs restrict mobility for individuals requiring ventilatory support of more than 60% Fio2 (fraction of inspired oxygen) and/or positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) greater than 10-cm H2O (positive end-expiratory pressure). Preliminary evidence from implementation studies may suggest that some individuals with COVID-19 requiring enhanced ventilatory support outside of established parameters may be able to safely participate in mobility-related interventions, though further research is needed to determine safety and feasibility to guide clinical decision making.

重症COVID-19呼吸衰竭患者早期康复的实施:一项范围综述
本综述的目的是描述目前重症监护病房中COVID-19患者早期康复的临床实践指南(cpg),并检查实施活动相关干预措施的实践模式。方法:检索2020年1月1日至2022年4月1日的PubMed、EMBASE和CINAHL数据库。入选的研究包括重症COVID-19住院患者,并为行动干预的临床决策提供客观标准。共评估了1464份出版物的合格性和数据提取。遵循PRISMA-ScR检查表和已建立的范围审查报告指南。结果:12篇文章符合纳入标准:5篇cpg, 7篇实施文章。实施早期康复的客观临床标准和指南在不同系统中表现出不同的一致性。无明显不良事件报道。结论:60%(3/5)的CPGs限制了需要通气支持的个体的活动能力,超过60% Fio2(吸入氧分数)和/或呼气末正压(PEEP)大于10 cm H2O(呼气末正压)。实施研究的初步证据可能表明,一些需要在既定参数之外加强呼吸支持的COVID-19患者可能能够安全地参与与行动相关的干预措施,但需要进一步研究以确定安全性和可行性,以指导临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
25
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信