Enhanced recovery after surgery in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 ANDROLOGY
Jing Zhou, Zhu-Feng Peng, Pan Song, Lu-Chen Yang, Zheng-Huan Liu, Shuai-Ke Shi, Lin-Chun Wang, Jun-Hao Chen, Liang-Ren Liu, Qiang Dong
{"title":"Enhanced recovery after surgery in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia.","authors":"Jing Zhou,&nbsp;Zhu-Feng Peng,&nbsp;Pan Song,&nbsp;Lu-Chen Yang,&nbsp;Zheng-Huan Liu,&nbsp;Shuai-Ke Shi,&nbsp;Lin-Chun Wang,&nbsp;Jun-Hao Chen,&nbsp;Liang-Ren Liu,&nbsp;Qiang Dong","doi":"10.4103/aja202267","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) measures have not been systematically applied in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This study was performed on patients with BPH who required surgical intervention. From July 2019 to June 2020, the ERAS program was applied to 248 patients, and the conventional program was applied to 238 patients. After 1 year of follow-up, the differences between the ERAS group and the conventional group were evaluated. The ERAS group had a shorter time of urinary catheterization compared with the conventional group (mean ± standard deviation [s.d.]: 1.0 ± 0.4 days vs 2.7 ± 0.8 days, P < 0.01), and the pain (mean ± s.d.) was significantly reduced through postoperative hospitalization days (PODs) 0-2 (POD 0: 1.7 ± 0.8 vs 2.4 ± 1.0, P < 0.01; POD 1: 1.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.5 ± 1.3, P < 0.01; POD 2: 1.2 ± 0.7 vs 3.0 ± 1.3, P < 0.01). No statistically significant difference was found in the rate of postoperative complications, such as postoperative bleeding (P = 0.79), urinary retention (P = 0.40), fever (P = 0.55), and readmission (P = 0.71). The hospitalization cost of the ERAS group was similar to that of the conventional group (mean ± s.d.: 16 927.8 ± 5808.1 Chinese Yuan [CNY] vs 17 044.1 ± 5830.7 CNY, P =0.85). The International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) scores in the two groups were also similar when compared at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after discharge. The ERAS program we conducted was safe, repeatable, and efficient. In conclusion, patients undergoing the ERAS program experienced less postoperative stress than those undergoing the conventional program.</p>","PeriodicalId":8483,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Andrology","volume":"25 3","pages":"356-360"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1b/1e/AJA-25-356.PMC10226510.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Andrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aja202267","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANDROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) measures have not been systematically applied in transurethral surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This study was performed on patients with BPH who required surgical intervention. From July 2019 to June 2020, the ERAS program was applied to 248 patients, and the conventional program was applied to 238 patients. After 1 year of follow-up, the differences between the ERAS group and the conventional group were evaluated. The ERAS group had a shorter time of urinary catheterization compared with the conventional group (mean ± standard deviation [s.d.]: 1.0 ± 0.4 days vs 2.7 ± 0.8 days, P < 0.01), and the pain (mean ± s.d.) was significantly reduced through postoperative hospitalization days (PODs) 0-2 (POD 0: 1.7 ± 0.8 vs 2.4 ± 1.0, P < 0.01; POD 1: 1.6 ± 0.9 vs 3.5 ± 1.3, P < 0.01; POD 2: 1.2 ± 0.7 vs 3.0 ± 1.3, P < 0.01). No statistically significant difference was found in the rate of postoperative complications, such as postoperative bleeding (P = 0.79), urinary retention (P = 0.40), fever (P = 0.55), and readmission (P = 0.71). The hospitalization cost of the ERAS group was similar to that of the conventional group (mean ± s.d.: 16 927.8 ± 5808.1 Chinese Yuan [CNY] vs 17 044.1 ± 5830.7 CNY, P =0.85). The International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) scores in the two groups were also similar when compared at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after discharge. The ERAS program we conducted was safe, repeatable, and efficient. In conclusion, patients undergoing the ERAS program experienced less postoperative stress than those undergoing the conventional program.

Abstract Image

经尿道良性前列腺增生手术后增强恢复。
增强术后恢复(ERAS)措施尚未系统地应用于经尿道手术治疗良性前列腺增生(BPH)。这项研究是在需要手术干预的前列腺增生患者中进行的。2019年7月至2020年6月,应用ERAS方案248例,应用常规方案238例。随访1年后,评估ERAS组与常规组的差异。ERAS组尿路导尿时间较常规组短(均数±标准差[s.d。]: 1.0±0.4天vs 2.7±0.8天,P < 0.01),术后住院天数0 ~ 2天(POD 0: 1.7±0.8 vs 2.4±1.0,P < 0.01)疼痛(平均±s.d)明显减轻;POD 1: 1.6±0.9 vs 3.5±1.3,P < 0.01;POD 2: 1.2±0.7 vs 3.0±1.3,P < 0.01)。两组术后并发症发生率差异无统计学意义,如术后出血(P = 0.79)、尿潴留(P = 0.40)、发热(P = 0.55)、再入院(P = 0.71)。ERAS组住院费用与常规组相似(平均±s.d: 16 927.8±5808.1元人民币vs 17 044.1±5830.7元人民币,P =0.85)。两组患者在出院后1个月、3个月、6个月和12个月的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)和生活质量评分(QoL)也相似。我们进行的ERAS项目安全、可重复、高效。总之,接受ERAS方案的患者比接受常规方案的患者经历了更少的术后压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Andrology
Asian Journal of Andrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
2252
审稿时长
2.2 months
期刊介绍: Fields of particular interest to the journal include, but are not limited to: -Sperm biology: cellular and molecular mechanisms- Male reproductive system: structure and function- Hormonal regulation of male reproduction- Male infertility: etiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment and prevention- Semen analysis & sperm functional assays- Sperm selection & quality and ART outcomes- Male sexual dysfunction- Male puberty development- Male ageing- Prostate diseases- Operational andrology- HIV & male reproductive tract infection- Male contraception- Environmental, lifestyle, genetic factors and male health- Male reproductive toxicology- Male sexual and reproductive health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信