Micki Washburn, Danielle E Parrish, Holly K Oxhandler, Brianna Garrison, Any Ma
{"title":"Licensed Master of Social Workers' Engagement in the Process of Evidence-Based Practice: Barriers and Facilitators.","authors":"Micki Washburn, Danielle E Parrish, Holly K Oxhandler, Brianna Garrison, Any Ma","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2021.1918598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b>This article describes the qualitative responses from licensed masters-level social workers (LMSWs) regarding what they perceive as barriers and facilitators to consistently engaging in the process of evidence-based practice (EBP). <b>Method:</b>Two open-ended questions were posed to determine what helps social workers consistently use the EBP process and what inhibits them from regularly applying EBP to guide clinical decision-making. A total of 113 responses were recorded. Content analysis was used to identify emergent themes. <b>Results:</b>Facilitators to the consistent use of EBP included: the belief that EBP improves outcomes, research that was vetted and disseminated by trusted partners such as the National Association of Social Workers (NASW), and ethical mandates. Barriers included: time, lack of applicable research, client-specific factors, and cost. Factors identified as both facilitating and impeding the EBP process were lack of necessary technology, organizational context, provider beliefs, and research knowledge/training. <b>Discussion and Conclusion:</b> Providers identified a number of barriers and facilitators to engaging in the process of evidence-based practice, which guided the extent to which they consistently engaged in the process, and how difficult they perceived itto be.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":"18 6","pages":"619-635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26408066.2021.1918598","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2021.1918598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
Abstract
Purpose:This article describes the qualitative responses from licensed masters-level social workers (LMSWs) regarding what they perceive as barriers and facilitators to consistently engaging in the process of evidence-based practice (EBP). Method:Two open-ended questions were posed to determine what helps social workers consistently use the EBP process and what inhibits them from regularly applying EBP to guide clinical decision-making. A total of 113 responses were recorded. Content analysis was used to identify emergent themes. Results:Facilitators to the consistent use of EBP included: the belief that EBP improves outcomes, research that was vetted and disseminated by trusted partners such as the National Association of Social Workers (NASW), and ethical mandates. Barriers included: time, lack of applicable research, client-specific factors, and cost. Factors identified as both facilitating and impeding the EBP process were lack of necessary technology, organizational context, provider beliefs, and research knowledge/training. Discussion and Conclusion: Providers identified a number of barriers and facilitators to engaging in the process of evidence-based practice, which guided the extent to which they consistently engaged in the process, and how difficult they perceived itto be.