Licensed Master of Social Workers' Engagement in the Process of Evidence-Based Practice: Barriers and Facilitators.

Micki Washburn, Danielle E Parrish, Holly K Oxhandler, Brianna Garrison, Any Ma
{"title":"Licensed Master of Social Workers' Engagement in the Process of Evidence-Based Practice: Barriers and Facilitators.","authors":"Micki Washburn,&nbsp;Danielle E Parrish,&nbsp;Holly K Oxhandler,&nbsp;Brianna Garrison,&nbsp;Any Ma","doi":"10.1080/26408066.2021.1918598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b>This article describes the qualitative responses from licensed masters-level social workers (LMSWs) regarding what they perceive as barriers and facilitators to consistently engaging in the process of evidence-based practice (EBP). <b>Method:</b>Two open-ended questions were posed to determine what helps social workers consistently use the EBP process and what inhibits them from regularly applying EBP to guide clinical decision-making. A total of 113 responses were recorded. Content analysis was used to identify emergent themes. <b>Results:</b>Facilitators to the consistent use of EBP included: the belief that EBP improves outcomes, research that was vetted and disseminated by trusted partners such as the National Association of Social Workers (NASW), and ethical mandates. Barriers included: time, lack of applicable research, client-specific factors, and cost. Factors identified as both facilitating and impeding the EBP process were lack of necessary technology, organizational context, provider beliefs, and research knowledge/training. <b>Discussion and Conclusion:</b> Providers identified a number of barriers and facilitators to engaging in the process of evidence-based practice, which guided the extent to which they consistently engaged in the process, and how difficult they perceived itto be.</p>","PeriodicalId":73742,"journal":{"name":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","volume":"18 6","pages":"619-635"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/26408066.2021.1918598","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of evidence-based social work (2019)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/26408066.2021.1918598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose:This article describes the qualitative responses from licensed masters-level social workers (LMSWs) regarding what they perceive as barriers and facilitators to consistently engaging in the process of evidence-based practice (EBP). Method:Two open-ended questions were posed to determine what helps social workers consistently use the EBP process and what inhibits them from regularly applying EBP to guide clinical decision-making. A total of 113 responses were recorded. Content analysis was used to identify emergent themes. Results:Facilitators to the consistent use of EBP included: the belief that EBP improves outcomes, research that was vetted and disseminated by trusted partners such as the National Association of Social Workers (NASW), and ethical mandates. Barriers included: time, lack of applicable research, client-specific factors, and cost. Factors identified as both facilitating and impeding the EBP process were lack of necessary technology, organizational context, provider beliefs, and research knowledge/training. Discussion and Conclusion: Providers identified a number of barriers and facilitators to engaging in the process of evidence-based practice, which guided the extent to which they consistently engaged in the process, and how difficult they perceived itto be.

社会工作者在循证实践过程中的参与:障碍和促进因素。
目的:本文描述了持证大师级社会工作者(LMSWs)关于他们认为持续参与循证实践(EBP)过程中的障碍和促进因素的定性反应。方法:提出了两个开放式问题,以确定是什么帮助社会工作者始终如一地使用EBP过程,是什么阻碍他们定期应用EBP来指导临床决策。总共记录了113份回复。内容分析用于识别突现主题。结果:促进EBP持续使用的因素包括:相信EBP可以改善结果,研究得到了可信赖的合作伙伴(如全国社会工作者协会(NASW))的审查和传播,以及道德要求。障碍包括:时间、缺乏适用研究、客户特定因素和成本。被确定为促进和阻碍EBP过程的因素是缺乏必要的技术、组织背景、提供者信念和研究知识/培训。讨论和结论:提供者确定了参与循证实践过程的一些障碍和促进因素,这些障碍和促进因素指导了他们始终参与该过程的程度,以及他们认为该过程的难度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信