Francesco Fiz, Gianluca Bottoni, Michela Massollo, Pierpaolo Trimboli, Ugo Catrambone, Lorenzo Bacigalupo, Sergio Righi, Giorgio Treglia, Alessio Imperiale, Arnoldo Piccardo
{"title":"[18F]F-Choline PET/CT and 4D-CT in the evaluation of primary hyperparathyroidism: rivals or allies?","authors":"Francesco Fiz, Gianluca Bottoni, Michela Massollo, Pierpaolo Trimboli, Ugo Catrambone, Lorenzo Bacigalupo, Sergio Righi, Giorgio Treglia, Alessio Imperiale, Arnoldo Piccardo","doi":"10.23736/S1824-4785.23.03514-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Primary hyperparathyroidism is a hard-to-diagnose condition that can run without symptoms for many years without causing symptoms; yet, it can cause dire long-term consequences, such as osteoporosis and renal impairment. First-line diagnostic methods include ultrasound and parathyroid scintigraphy, which provide unsatisfactory results in terms of detection rate. Second-line imaging methods include [<sup>18</sup>F]F-Choline PET/CT, 4D-CT, and their combination. These methods have shown a great detection rate and sensitivity; however, they are to this day less widespread than the first-line ones. Both the two methods (PET and 4D-CT) have their specific advantages and field of application, as well as their specific limitations. In this narrative review, we will describe the advantages and disadvantages of the two techniques extensively. Moreover, we will try to identify whether the combined examination can play a role and how relevant this role is. Finally, we will try to define the specific clinical situation in which each method can provide the best contribution to diagnosing parathyroid tissue hyperfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":23069,"journal":{"name":"The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...","volume":"67 2","pages":"130-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of...","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1824-4785.23.03514-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Primary hyperparathyroidism is a hard-to-diagnose condition that can run without symptoms for many years without causing symptoms; yet, it can cause dire long-term consequences, such as osteoporosis and renal impairment. First-line diagnostic methods include ultrasound and parathyroid scintigraphy, which provide unsatisfactory results in terms of detection rate. Second-line imaging methods include [18F]F-Choline PET/CT, 4D-CT, and their combination. These methods have shown a great detection rate and sensitivity; however, they are to this day less widespread than the first-line ones. Both the two methods (PET and 4D-CT) have their specific advantages and field of application, as well as their specific limitations. In this narrative review, we will describe the advantages and disadvantages of the two techniques extensively. Moreover, we will try to identify whether the combined examination can play a role and how relevant this role is. Finally, we will try to define the specific clinical situation in which each method can provide the best contribution to diagnosing parathyroid tissue hyperfunction.
原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进是一种难以诊断的疾病,可以无症状地运行多年而不引起症状;然而,它会导致可怕的长期后果,如骨质疏松症和肾功能损害。一线诊断方法包括超声和甲状旁腺显像,但其检出率不理想。二线成像方法包括[18F] f -胆碱PET/CT、4D-CT及其组合。这些方法具有较高的检出率和灵敏度;然而,到目前为止,它们还没有一线城市那么普遍。两种方法(PET和4D-CT)都有其特定的优势和应用领域,也有其特定的局限性。在这篇叙述性的综述中,我们将广泛地描述这两种技术的优缺点。此外,我们将尝试确定联合检查是否可以发挥作用以及这种作用的相关性如何。最后,我们将尝试定义具体的临床情况,其中每种方法可以提供诊断甲状旁腺组织功能亢进的最佳贡献。