How do COVID-19 vaccines affect rheumatic diseases?

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 Medicine
Lale Altan, Salim Mısırcı, İlker Yağcı, Meltem Karacaatlı, Feyza Ünlü Özkan, Altuğ Güner, İlknur Aktaş
{"title":"How do COVID-19 vaccines affect rheumatic diseases?","authors":"Lale Altan,&nbsp;Salim Mısırcı,&nbsp;İlker Yağcı,&nbsp;Meltem Karacaatlı,&nbsp;Feyza Ünlü Özkan,&nbsp;Altuğ Güner,&nbsp;İlknur Aktaş","doi":"10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.9530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aims to investigate the effects of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines administered in Türkiye on disease activity and the side effects in the patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Between September 2021 and February 2022, a total of 536 patients with IRD (225 males, 311 females; mean age: 50.5±12.6 years; range, 18 to 93 years) who were vaccinated against COVID-19 and followed in the outpatient setting were included in the study. Vaccination status of the patients and whether they had COVID-19 were questioned. All patients were asked to rate their anxiety about the vaccination on a scale of 0-10 before and after the shots. They were asked whether they experienced any side effects and an increase in IRD complaints after vaccination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 128 (23.9%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 before the first vaccination. Totally, 180 (33.6%) patients were vaccinated with CoronaVac (Sinovac) and 214 (39.9%) patients with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). Also, 142 (26.5%) patients were given both vaccines. When the anxiety level of the patients before the first vaccination was questioned, 53.4% reported that they had no anxiety. The rate of patients without any anxiety after vaccination was 67.9%. Comparison of pre- (median Q3=6) and post-vaccine (median Q3=1) anxiety values showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). A total of 283 (52.8%) patients reported side effects after vaccination. When both vaccines were compared with each other, the rate of the side effects was higher in the BNT162b2 group (p<0.001) and also in the CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 group (p=0.022). There was no statistically significant difference between BNT162b2 and CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 in terms of side effects (p=0.066). Forty-five (8.4%) patients had increased rheumatic complaints after vaccination.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The lack of a significant increase in disease activity after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IRD and the absence of serious side effects requiring hospitalization support the safety of vaccines in this patient group.</p>","PeriodicalId":8328,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/ac/b5/ArchRheumatol-2023-38-075.PMC10208616.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46497/ArchRheumatol.2023.9530","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aims to investigate the effects of novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines administered in Türkiye on disease activity and the side effects in the patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD).

Patients and methods: Between September 2021 and February 2022, a total of 536 patients with IRD (225 males, 311 females; mean age: 50.5±12.6 years; range, 18 to 93 years) who were vaccinated against COVID-19 and followed in the outpatient setting were included in the study. Vaccination status of the patients and whether they had COVID-19 were questioned. All patients were asked to rate their anxiety about the vaccination on a scale of 0-10 before and after the shots. They were asked whether they experienced any side effects and an increase in IRD complaints after vaccination.

Results: A total of 128 (23.9%) patients were diagnosed with COVID-19 before the first vaccination. Totally, 180 (33.6%) patients were vaccinated with CoronaVac (Sinovac) and 214 (39.9%) patients with BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). Also, 142 (26.5%) patients were given both vaccines. When the anxiety level of the patients before the first vaccination was questioned, 53.4% reported that they had no anxiety. The rate of patients without any anxiety after vaccination was 67.9%. Comparison of pre- (median Q3=6) and post-vaccine (median Q3=1) anxiety values showed a statistically significant difference (p<0.001). A total of 283 (52.8%) patients reported side effects after vaccination. When both vaccines were compared with each other, the rate of the side effects was higher in the BNT162b2 group (p<0.001) and also in the CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 group (p=0.022). There was no statistically significant difference between BNT162b2 and CoronaVac plus BNT162b2 in terms of side effects (p=0.066). Forty-five (8.4%) patients had increased rheumatic complaints after vaccination.

Conclusion: The lack of a significant increase in disease activity after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IRD and the absence of serious side effects requiring hospitalization support the safety of vaccines in this patient group.

COVID-19疫苗如何影响风湿病?
目的:本研究旨在探讨新型冠状病毒病2019 (COVID-19)疫苗在 rkiye接种后对炎症性风湿病(IRD)患者疾病活动性的影响及其副作用。患者和方法:2021年9月至2022年2月,共536例IRD患者(男性225例,女性311例;平均年龄:50.5±12.6岁;年龄在18至93岁之间),接种了COVID-19疫苗并在门诊环境中随访的患者被纳入研究。询问患者的疫苗接种情况和是否感染COVID-19。所有患者都被要求在接种疫苗前后对他们的焦虑程度进行0-10分的评分。他们被问及接种疫苗后是否有任何副作用和IRD投诉的增加。结果:首次接种前确诊病例128例(23.9%)。总共有180例(33.6%)患者接种了CoronaVac (Sinovac), 214例(39.9%)患者接种了BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech)。此外,142例(26.5%)患者同时接种了两种疫苗。对首次接种前患者的焦虑水平进行调查时,53.4%的人表示没有焦虑。接种后无焦虑症状者占67.9%。接种前(Q3中位数=6)与接种后(Q3中位数=1)的焦虑值比较,差异有统计学意义(p)。结论:IRD患者接种COVID-19疫苗后疾病活动性未明显升高,且未出现需要住院治疗的严重副作用,支持该患者组疫苗的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of rheumatology
Archives of rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: The Archives of Rheumatology is an official journal of the Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR) and is published quarterly in March, June, September, and December. It publishes original work on all aspects of rheumatology and disorders of the musculoskeletal system. The priority of the Archives of Rheumatology is to publish high-quality original research articles, especially in inflammatory rheumatic disorders. In addition to research articles, brief reports, reviews, editorials, letters to the editor can also be published. It is an independent peer-reviewed international journal printed in English. Manuscripts are refereed by a "double-blind peer-reviewed" process for both referees and authors. Editorial Board of the Archives of Rheumatology works under the principles of The World Association of Medical Editors (WAME), the International Council of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE), and Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信