Determinants of point-of-care ultrasound lung sliding amplitude in mechanically ventilated patients.

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine
David N Briganti, Christine E Choi, Julien Nguyen, Charles W Lanks
{"title":"Determinants of point-of-care ultrasound lung sliding amplitude in mechanically ventilated patients.","authors":"David N Briganti,&nbsp;Christine E Choi,&nbsp;Julien Nguyen,&nbsp;Charles W Lanks","doi":"10.1186/s13089-023-00326-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although lung sliding seen by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is known to be affected to varying degrees by different physiologic and pathologic processes, it is typically only reported qualitatively in the critical care setting. Lung sliding amplitude quantitatively expresses the amount of pleural movement seen by POCUS but its determinants in mechanically ventilated patients are largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a single-center, prospective, observational pilot study examining 40 hemithoraces in 20 adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Each subject had lung sliding amplitude measured in both B-mode and by pulsed wave Doppler at their bilateral lung apices and bases. Differences in lung sliding amplitude were correlated with anatomical location (apex vs base) as well as physiologic parameters including positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), driving pressure, tidal volume and the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO<sub>2</sub>) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO<sub>2</sub>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POCUS lung sliding amplitude was significantly lower at the lung apex compared to the lung base in both B-mode (3.6 ± 2.0 mm vs 8.6 ± 4.3 mm; p < 0.001) and the pulsed wave Doppler mode (10.3 ± 4.6 cm/s vs 13.9 ± 5.5 cm/s; p < 0.001) corresponding to expected distribution of ventilation to the lung bases. Inter-rater reliability of B-mode measurements was excellent (ICC = 0.91) and distance traversed in B-mode had a significant positive correlation with pleural line velocity (r<sup>2</sup> = 0.32; p < 0.001). There was a non-statistically significant trend towards lower lung sliding amplitude for PEEP ≥ 10 cmH<sub>2</sub>O, as well as for driving pressure ≥ 15 cmH<sub>2</sub>O in both ultrasound modes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POCUS lung sliding amplitude was significantly lower at the lung apex than the lung base in mechanically ventilated patients. This was true when using both B-mode and pulsed wave Doppler. Lung sliding amplitude did not correlate with PEEP, driving pressure, tidal volume or PaO<sub>2</sub>:FiO<sub>2</sub> ratio. Our findings suggest that lung sliding amplitude can be quantified in mechanically ventilated patients in a physiologically predictable way and with high inter-rater reliability. A better understanding of POCUS derived lung sliding amplitude and its determinants may aid in the more accurate diagnosis of lung pathologies, including pneumothorax, and could serve as a means of further reducing radiation exposure and improving outcomes in critically ill patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10203658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-023-00326-5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although lung sliding seen by point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is known to be affected to varying degrees by different physiologic and pathologic processes, it is typically only reported qualitatively in the critical care setting. Lung sliding amplitude quantitatively expresses the amount of pleural movement seen by POCUS but its determinants in mechanically ventilated patients are largely unknown.

Methods: This was a single-center, prospective, observational pilot study examining 40 hemithoraces in 20 adult patients receiving mechanical ventilation. Each subject had lung sliding amplitude measured in both B-mode and by pulsed wave Doppler at their bilateral lung apices and bases. Differences in lung sliding amplitude were correlated with anatomical location (apex vs base) as well as physiologic parameters including positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP), driving pressure, tidal volume and the ratio of arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) to fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2).

Results: POCUS lung sliding amplitude was significantly lower at the lung apex compared to the lung base in both B-mode (3.6 ± 2.0 mm vs 8.6 ± 4.3 mm; p < 0.001) and the pulsed wave Doppler mode (10.3 ± 4.6 cm/s vs 13.9 ± 5.5 cm/s; p < 0.001) corresponding to expected distribution of ventilation to the lung bases. Inter-rater reliability of B-mode measurements was excellent (ICC = 0.91) and distance traversed in B-mode had a significant positive correlation with pleural line velocity (r2 = 0.32; p < 0.001). There was a non-statistically significant trend towards lower lung sliding amplitude for PEEP ≥ 10 cmH2O, as well as for driving pressure ≥ 15 cmH2O in both ultrasound modes.

Conclusion: POCUS lung sliding amplitude was significantly lower at the lung apex than the lung base in mechanically ventilated patients. This was true when using both B-mode and pulsed wave Doppler. Lung sliding amplitude did not correlate with PEEP, driving pressure, tidal volume or PaO2:FiO2 ratio. Our findings suggest that lung sliding amplitude can be quantified in mechanically ventilated patients in a physiologically predictable way and with high inter-rater reliability. A better understanding of POCUS derived lung sliding amplitude and its determinants may aid in the more accurate diagnosis of lung pathologies, including pneumothorax, and could serve as a means of further reducing radiation exposure and improving outcomes in critically ill patients.

机械通气患者点护理超声肺滑动振幅的决定因素。
背景:虽然已知通过即时超声(POCUS)观察到的肺滑动在不同程度上受到不同生理和病理过程的影响,但通常仅在重症监护环境中定性报道。肺滑动幅度定量表达POCUS所见的胸膜运动量,但其在机械通气患者中的决定因素在很大程度上是未知的。方法:这是一项单中心、前瞻性、观察性的初步研究,对20例接受机械通气的40例半胸患者进行了检查。每个受试者在双侧肺尖和肺底分别用b型和脉冲波多普勒测量肺滑动幅度。肺滑动幅度的差异与解剖位置(顶点与底端)、呼气末正压(PEEP)、驱动压、潮气量、动脉血氧分压(PaO2)与吸入氧分数(FiO2)之比等生理参数相关。结果:两种b模式下,POCUS肺滑动幅值在肺尖处明显低于肺底处(3.6±2.0 mm vs 8.6±4.3 mm;p 2 = 0.32;p 2O,两种超声模式下驱动压力≥15 cmH2O。结论:机械通气患者POCUS肺滑动幅度在肺尖处明显低于肺底处。当使用b模和脉冲波多普勒时,这是正确的。肺滑动幅值与PEEP、驱动压、潮气量、PaO2:FiO2比值无相关性。我们的研究结果表明,在机械通气患者中,肺滑动幅度可以以生理上可预测的方式量化,并且具有较高的评分间可靠性。更好地了解POCUS衍生的肺滑动幅度及其决定因素可能有助于更准确地诊断肺部病变,包括气胸,并可作为进一步减少辐射暴露和改善危重患者预后的手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信