Economic impact of Ebola virus disease outbreak on an extractive firm: a case study.

Hisham Tariq, David Tresco Emes, Yebeen Ysabelle Boo, Alexander Light, Zia Sadique, Mishal Khan, Alan Knight, Osman Dar, Logan Manikam
{"title":"Economic impact of Ebola virus disease outbreak on an extractive firm: a case study.","authors":"Hisham Tariq,&nbsp;David Tresco Emes,&nbsp;Yebeen Ysabelle Boo,&nbsp;Alexander Light,&nbsp;Zia Sadique,&nbsp;Mishal Khan,&nbsp;Alan Knight,&nbsp;Osman Dar,&nbsp;Logan Manikam","doi":"10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The recent Ebola virus disease (EVD) epidemic was one of the most severe public health emergencies in modern times. The economic impact of epidemics has mostly been analysed at the macroeconomic level. Conversely, we aimed to estimate the economic costs of preventive measures of the epidemic to an extractive firm, ArcelorMittal (AM), using data in the epidemic region from March 2014 to December 2015. AM is the world's largest steel producer and is particularly important in West Africa, where the extractive industry is economically crucial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative methods, in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs), were used to investigate the events and channels of impact of the epidemic on the firm, as perceived by employees and contractors. Quantitative data regarding these costs were also collected. Retrospective cost analysis estimated the actual cost of preventive methods adopted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents indicated the largest cost impact was suspension of the Phase II expansion, a series of projects designed to increase iron ore production in Liberia. The next largest cost was the preventive measures adopted to counter disease spread. Total costs incurred for adopting preventive measures were USD 10.58-11.11 million. The overall direct costs of preventive measures adopted within the fence, meaning within the physical boundary of the firm's sites, shared 30-31% of the total costs incurred. The share of external donations supporting humanitarian response was 11-12% of the total costs, followed by 7-12% of relational costs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The firm's response during the EVD epidemic focussed on its employees and operations, which was later expanded to the wider community and then in supporting the international humanitarian response.</p>","PeriodicalId":75271,"journal":{"name":"UCL open environment","volume":"2 ","pages":"e007"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10208325/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCL open environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The recent Ebola virus disease (EVD) epidemic was one of the most severe public health emergencies in modern times. The economic impact of epidemics has mostly been analysed at the macroeconomic level. Conversely, we aimed to estimate the economic costs of preventive measures of the epidemic to an extractive firm, ArcelorMittal (AM), using data in the epidemic region from March 2014 to December 2015. AM is the world's largest steel producer and is particularly important in West Africa, where the extractive industry is economically crucial.

Methods: Qualitative methods, in-depth interviews (IDIs) and focus group discussions (FGDs), were used to investigate the events and channels of impact of the epidemic on the firm, as perceived by employees and contractors. Quantitative data regarding these costs were also collected. Retrospective cost analysis estimated the actual cost of preventive methods adopted.

Results: Most respondents indicated the largest cost impact was suspension of the Phase II expansion, a series of projects designed to increase iron ore production in Liberia. The next largest cost was the preventive measures adopted to counter disease spread. Total costs incurred for adopting preventive measures were USD 10.58-11.11 million. The overall direct costs of preventive measures adopted within the fence, meaning within the physical boundary of the firm's sites, shared 30-31% of the total costs incurred. The share of external donations supporting humanitarian response was 11-12% of the total costs, followed by 7-12% of relational costs.

Conclusions: The firm's response during the EVD epidemic focussed on its employees and operations, which was later expanded to the wider community and then in supporting the international humanitarian response.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

埃博拉病毒病爆发对一家采掘公司的经济影响:案例研究。
目的:最近的埃博拉病毒病(EVD)流行是现代最严重的突发公共卫生事件之一。流行病的经济影响主要是在宏观经济一级进行分析的。相反,我们的目的是利用2014年3月至2015年12月疫区的数据,估计该流行病预防措施对采掘业公司安赛乐米塔尔(ArcelorMittal, AM)的经济成本。AM是全球最大的钢铁生产商,在西非尤其重要,那里的采掘业在经济上至关重要。方法:采用定性方法、深度访谈(IDIs)和焦点小组讨论(fgd),调查员工和承包商认为疫情对公司的影响的事件和渠道。还收集了有关这些费用的数量数据。回顾性成本分析估算了所采用的预防方法的实际成本。结果:大多数受访者表示,最大的成本影响是暂停二期扩建,这是一系列旨在增加利比里亚铁矿石产量的项目。第二大支出是为防止疾病传播而采取的预防措施。采取预防措施的总费用为1058 - 1111万美元。在围栏内采取的预防措施的总直接成本,即在公司场地的物理边界内,共占总成本的30-31%。支持人道主义反应的外部捐款占总成本的11-12%,其次是关系成本的7-12%。结论:在埃博拉病毒病流行期间,该公司的应对措施侧重于其员工和业务,后来扩展到更广泛的社区,然后支持国际人道主义应对。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信