Effect of lockdown on activities of daily living in the built environment and wellbeing.

Sudhir Kumar Pasala, Lakshmi Gumpeny, Madhu Kosuri, Snehalatha Tippana, Gumpeny R Sridhar
{"title":"Effect of lockdown on activities of daily living in the built environment and wellbeing.","authors":"Sudhir Kumar Pasala,&nbsp;Lakshmi Gumpeny,&nbsp;Madhu Kosuri,&nbsp;Snehalatha Tippana,&nbsp;Gumpeny R Sridhar","doi":"10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In an effort to arrest the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) infection, a nationwide lockdown was declared in India in March 2020. To assess how personal built environments affected the citizens in the first few weeks, an explorative online survey was conducted, eliciting responses about work habits before the lockdown, psychological wellbeing, time spent in various activities, characteristics of those who worked from home, and food and sleep patterns. We received 121 (76 male and 45 female) responses with an average age of 35.5 years [max: 70 years, min: 18 years, standard deviation (SD): 12.9 years]. The major difference caused by the lockdown was a reduction in the time taken and distance travelled of the commute to workplaces, which was an average of 30 minutes and 9.5 km, respectively. In terms of diet, subjects who were vegetarian did not experience any difference, unlike those who were non-vegetarians (<i>p</i> < 0.05). The results show an association of the dependent variable of 'feeling in general' with predictor variables of 'energy, pep, vitality' and 'feel healthy to work' during the pandemic, whereas the predictor variables of 'energy, pep, vitality', 'happy and satisfied personal life', 'feel healthy to work' show an association with the dependent variable of 'feeling in general' before the lockdown with a significance of <i>p</i> < 0.02 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.51 and R<sup>2</sup> = 0.60, respectively. Among those who worked from home in constrained environments, people found spaces and seemed to adapt reasonably well to the built environment with employees showing a preference for working from bedrooms and students for working from 'sit-out' (outside) spaces (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was no change in the quality or quantity of sleep during the lockdown. This study in the early weeks of the lockdown documents the way in which individuals lived through it in terms of the built environment at home.</p>","PeriodicalId":75271,"journal":{"name":"UCL open environment","volume":"3 ","pages":"e017"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10171407/pdf/","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCL open environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14324/111.444/ucloe.000017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

In an effort to arrest the spread of coronavirus (COVID-19) infection, a nationwide lockdown was declared in India in March 2020. To assess how personal built environments affected the citizens in the first few weeks, an explorative online survey was conducted, eliciting responses about work habits before the lockdown, psychological wellbeing, time spent in various activities, characteristics of those who worked from home, and food and sleep patterns. We received 121 (76 male and 45 female) responses with an average age of 35.5 years [max: 70 years, min: 18 years, standard deviation (SD): 12.9 years]. The major difference caused by the lockdown was a reduction in the time taken and distance travelled of the commute to workplaces, which was an average of 30 minutes and 9.5 km, respectively. In terms of diet, subjects who were vegetarian did not experience any difference, unlike those who were non-vegetarians (p < 0.05). The results show an association of the dependent variable of 'feeling in general' with predictor variables of 'energy, pep, vitality' and 'feel healthy to work' during the pandemic, whereas the predictor variables of 'energy, pep, vitality', 'happy and satisfied personal life', 'feel healthy to work' show an association with the dependent variable of 'feeling in general' before the lockdown with a significance of p < 0.02 and R2 = 0.51 and R2 = 0.60, respectively. Among those who worked from home in constrained environments, people found spaces and seemed to adapt reasonably well to the built environment with employees showing a preference for working from bedrooms and students for working from 'sit-out' (outside) spaces (p < 0.05). There was no change in the quality or quantity of sleep during the lockdown. This study in the early weeks of the lockdown documents the way in which individuals lived through it in terms of the built environment at home.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

封锁对建筑环境中日常生活活动和健康的影响。
为了遏制冠状病毒(COVID-19)感染的传播,印度于2020年3月宣布在全国范围内实施封锁。为了评估个人建筑环境在最初几周对市民的影响,开展了一项探索性在线调查,了解封锁前的工作习惯、心理健康、参加各种活动的时间、在家工作的人的特征以及饮食和睡眠模式。我们收到121例(男性76例,女性45例),平均年龄35.5岁[最大70岁,最小18岁,标准差(SD): 12.9岁]。封锁造成的主要差异是通勤到工作场所的时间和距离缩短了,平均分别为30分钟和9.5公里。在饮食方面,素食者与非素食者没有任何差异(p < 0.05)。结果显示,疫情期间,因变量“总体感觉”与预测变量“能量、活力、活力”和“健康工作感觉”存在关联,而“能量、活力、活力”、“个人生活幸福满意”、“健康工作感觉”与封锁前因变量“总体感觉”存在关联,显著性为p < 0.02, R2 = 0.51和R2 = 0.60。在那些在受限环境中在家工作的人中,人们找到了空间,似乎很好地适应了建筑环境,员工更喜欢在卧室工作,学生更喜欢在“静坐”(室外)空间工作(p < 0.05)。在封锁期间,睡眠的质量和数量没有变化。在封锁的最初几周进行的这项研究记录了人们在家中建筑环境中的生活方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信