Identification of Patient Safety Threats in a Post-Intensive Care Clinic.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kevin J Karlic, Thomas S Valley, Leigh M Cagino, Hallie C Prescott, Theodore J Iwashyna, Rima A Mohammad, Mari Pitcher, Evan Haezebrouck, Jakob I McSparron
{"title":"Identification of Patient Safety Threats in a Post-Intensive Care Clinic.","authors":"Kevin J Karlic,&nbsp;Thomas S Valley,&nbsp;Leigh M Cagino,&nbsp;Hallie C Prescott,&nbsp;Theodore J Iwashyna,&nbsp;Rima A Mohammad,&nbsp;Mari Pitcher,&nbsp;Evan Haezebrouck,&nbsp;Jakob I McSparron","doi":"10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The extent to which postintensive care unit (ICU) clinics may improve patient safety for those discharged after receiving intensive care remains unclear. This observational cohort study conducted at an academic, tertiary care medical center used qualitative survey data analyzed via conventional content analysis to describe patient safety threats encountered in the post-ICU clinic. For 83 included patients, safety threats were identified for 60 patients resulting in 96 separate safety threats. These were categorized into 7 themes: medication errors (27%); inadequate medical follow-up (25%); inadequate patient support (16%); high-risk behaviors (5%); medical complications (5%); equipment/supplies failures (4%); and other (18%). Of the 96 safety threats, 41% were preventable, 27% ameliorable, and 32% were neither preventable nor ameliorable. Nearly 3 out of 4 patients within a post-ICU clinic had an identifiable safety threat. Medication errors and delayed medical follow-up were the most common safety threats identified; most were either preventable or ameliorable.</p>","PeriodicalId":7539,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Medical Quality","volume":"38 3","pages":"117-121"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10159998/pdf/nihms-1886885.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Medical Quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JMQ.0000000000000118","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The extent to which postintensive care unit (ICU) clinics may improve patient safety for those discharged after receiving intensive care remains unclear. This observational cohort study conducted at an academic, tertiary care medical center used qualitative survey data analyzed via conventional content analysis to describe patient safety threats encountered in the post-ICU clinic. For 83 included patients, safety threats were identified for 60 patients resulting in 96 separate safety threats. These were categorized into 7 themes: medication errors (27%); inadequate medical follow-up (25%); inadequate patient support (16%); high-risk behaviors (5%); medical complications (5%); equipment/supplies failures (4%); and other (18%). Of the 96 safety threats, 41% were preventable, 27% ameliorable, and 32% were neither preventable nor ameliorable. Nearly 3 out of 4 patients within a post-ICU clinic had an identifiable safety threat. Medication errors and delayed medical follow-up were the most common safety threats identified; most were either preventable or ameliorable.

重症监护室后患者安全威胁的识别。
重症监护病房(ICU)后诊所在多大程度上可以改善接受重症监护出院患者的安全仍不清楚。本观察性队列研究在一家学术三级医疗中心进行,使用定性调查数据,通过传统的内容分析来描述icu后诊所遇到的患者安全威胁。在83例纳入的患者中,确定了60例患者的安全威胁,导致96个单独的安全威胁。这些问题被分为7个主题:用药错误(27%);医疗随访不足(25%);患者支持不足(16%);高危行为(5%);医疗并发症(5%);设备/用品故障(4%);其他(18%)。在96个安全威胁中,41%是可以预防的,27%是可以改善的,32%既不能预防也不能改善。在icu后诊所,近3 / 4的患者存在可识别的安全威胁。用药错误和医疗随访延迟是最常见的安全威胁;大多数都是可以预防或改善的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
124
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Medical Quality (AJMQ) is focused on keeping readers informed of the resources, processes, and perspectives contributing to quality health care services. This peer-reviewed journal presents a forum for the exchange of ideas, strategies, and methods in improving the delivery and management of health care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信