Adaptive Governance of River Deltas Under Accelerating Environmental Change.

IF 0.6 Q2 Social Sciences
Mandy Paauw, Murray Scown, Annisa Triyanti, Haomiao DU, Ahjond Garmestani
{"title":"Adaptive Governance of River Deltas Under Accelerating Environmental Change.","authors":"Mandy Paauw, Murray Scown, Annisa Triyanti, Haomiao DU, Ahjond Garmestani","doi":"10.36633/ulr.803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Many deltas are increasingly threatened by environmental change, including climate change-induced sea-level rise, land subsidence and reduced sediment delivery. Dealing with these challenges is a pressing necessity because deltas are home to many people and are important centres for economic and agricultural development. Successfully adapting to climate change requires a social-ecological system (SES) perspective, emphasising that social and ecological components of deltas are intertwined. Various modes of governance have been suggested to deal with uncertainty associated with environmental change in SESs, such as adaptive governance. Adaptive governance underlines the need for governance systems to be flexible enough to adapt to variable degrees of uncertainty in SESs. In this paper, we analyse the Dutch Delta Programme (DDP) and the Mekong Delta Plan (MDP) to explore their strengths and limitations relating to nine principles for adaptive governance proposed by DeCaro and others. We evaluate the suitability of this framework for the Rhine and Mekong deltas and contribute to the current understanding of delta governance in light of climate change. Most of the principles outlined by DeCaro and others are present in the DDP and MDP. However, adaptive governance is context dependent. The Rhine and Mekong deltas display different obstacles to adaptive governance, some of which are not sufficiently emphasised in this academic adaptive governance framework. Instead of relying on one framework as a blueprint for adaptive governance, using principles from different frameworks depending on the case may be the best approach for addressing environmental challenges in deltas.</p>","PeriodicalId":44535,"journal":{"name":"Utrecht Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10204581/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Utrecht Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36633/ulr.803","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Many deltas are increasingly threatened by environmental change, including climate change-induced sea-level rise, land subsidence and reduced sediment delivery. Dealing with these challenges is a pressing necessity because deltas are home to many people and are important centres for economic and agricultural development. Successfully adapting to climate change requires a social-ecological system (SES) perspective, emphasising that social and ecological components of deltas are intertwined. Various modes of governance have been suggested to deal with uncertainty associated with environmental change in SESs, such as adaptive governance. Adaptive governance underlines the need for governance systems to be flexible enough to adapt to variable degrees of uncertainty in SESs. In this paper, we analyse the Dutch Delta Programme (DDP) and the Mekong Delta Plan (MDP) to explore their strengths and limitations relating to nine principles for adaptive governance proposed by DeCaro and others. We evaluate the suitability of this framework for the Rhine and Mekong deltas and contribute to the current understanding of delta governance in light of climate change. Most of the principles outlined by DeCaro and others are present in the DDP and MDP. However, adaptive governance is context dependent. The Rhine and Mekong deltas display different obstacles to adaptive governance, some of which are not sufficiently emphasised in this academic adaptive governance framework. Instead of relying on one framework as a blueprint for adaptive governance, using principles from different frameworks depending on the case may be the best approach for addressing environmental challenges in deltas.

Abstract Image

加速环境变化下的河流三角洲适应性治理。
许多三角洲正日益受到环境变化的威胁,包括气候变化引起的海平面上升、土地沉降和沉积物输送量减少。应对这些挑战迫在眉睫,因为三角洲是许多人的家园,也是重要的经济和农业发展中心。成功适应气候变化需要从社会生态系统(SES)的角度出发,强调三角洲的社会和生态组成部分是相互交织的。为应对与社会生态系统环境变化相关的不确定性,人们提出了各种治理模式,如适应性治理。适应性治理强调治理系统必须具有足够的灵活性,以适应 SES 中不同程度的不确定性。在本文中,我们分析了荷兰三角洲计划(DDP)和湄公河三角洲计划(MDP),以探讨它们与 DeCaro 等人提出的九项适应性治理原则相关的优势和局限性。我们评估了这一框架对莱茵河三角洲和湄公河三角洲的适用性,并对当前根据气候变化进行三角洲治理的理解做出了贡献。德卡洛等人概述的大多数原则都存在于《三角洲发展计划》和《湄公河发展计划》中。然而,适应性治理取决于具体情况。莱茵河三角洲和湄公河三角洲在适应性治理方面表现出不同的障碍,其中一些在这一学术适应性治理框架中没有得到充分强调。与其依赖一个框架作为适应性治理的蓝图,根据具体情况使用不同框架的原则可能是应对三角洲环境挑战的最佳方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信