Inpatient Rehabilitation After Acute Severe Stroke: Predictive Value of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Among Other Potential Predictors for Discharge Destination.

0 REHABILITATION
Sinikka Tarvonen-Schröder, Tuuli Niemi, Mari Koivisto
{"title":"Inpatient Rehabilitation After Acute Severe Stroke: Predictive Value of the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale Among Other Potential Predictors for Discharge Destination.","authors":"Sinikka Tarvonen-Schröder,&nbsp;Tuuli Niemi,&nbsp;Mari Koivisto","doi":"10.1177/27536351231157966","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Research focusing on predictors for discharge destination after rehabilitation of inpatients recovering from severe stroke is scarce. The predictive value of rehabilitation admission NIHSS score among other potential predictors available on admission to rehabilitation has not been studied.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of this retrospective interventional study was to determine the predictive accuracy of 24 hours and rehabilitation admission NIHSS scores among other potential socio-demographic, clinical and functional predictors for discharge destination routinely collected on admission to rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>On a university hospital specialized inpatient rehabilitation ward 156 consecutive rehabilitants with 24 hours NIHSS score ⩾15 were recruited. On admission to rehabilitation, routinely collected variables potentially associated with discharge destination (community vs institution) were analyzed using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>70 (44.9%) of rehabilitants were discharged to community, and 86 (55.1%) were discharged to institutional care. Those discharged home were younger and more often still working, had less often dysphagia/tube feeding or DNR decision in the acute phase, shorter time from stroke onset to rehabilitation admission, less severe impairment (NIHSS score, paresis, neglect) and disability (FIM score, ambulatory ability) on admission, and faster and more significant functional improvement during the in-stay than those institutionalized.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The most influential independent predictors for community discharge on admission to rehabilitation were lower admission NIHSS score, ambulatory ability and younger age, NIHSS being the most powerful. The odds of being discharged to community decreased with 16.1% for every 1 point increase in NIHSS. The 3-factor model explained 65.7% of community discharge and 81.9% of institutional discharge, the overall predictive accuracy being 74.7%. The corresponding figures for admission NIHSS alone were 58.6%, 70.9% and 65.4%.</p>","PeriodicalId":72107,"journal":{"name":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","volume":"12 ","pages":"27536351231157966"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10201155/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in rehabilitation science and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536351231157966","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Research focusing on predictors for discharge destination after rehabilitation of inpatients recovering from severe stroke is scarce. The predictive value of rehabilitation admission NIHSS score among other potential predictors available on admission to rehabilitation has not been studied.

Aim: The aim of this retrospective interventional study was to determine the predictive accuracy of 24 hours and rehabilitation admission NIHSS scores among other potential socio-demographic, clinical and functional predictors for discharge destination routinely collected on admission to rehabilitation.

Material and methods: On a university hospital specialized inpatient rehabilitation ward 156 consecutive rehabilitants with 24 hours NIHSS score ⩾15 were recruited. On admission to rehabilitation, routinely collected variables potentially associated with discharge destination (community vs institution) were analyzed using logistic regression.

Results: 70 (44.9%) of rehabilitants were discharged to community, and 86 (55.1%) were discharged to institutional care. Those discharged home were younger and more often still working, had less often dysphagia/tube feeding or DNR decision in the acute phase, shorter time from stroke onset to rehabilitation admission, less severe impairment (NIHSS score, paresis, neglect) and disability (FIM score, ambulatory ability) on admission, and faster and more significant functional improvement during the in-stay than those institutionalized.

Conclusion: The most influential independent predictors for community discharge on admission to rehabilitation were lower admission NIHSS score, ambulatory ability and younger age, NIHSS being the most powerful. The odds of being discharged to community decreased with 16.1% for every 1 point increase in NIHSS. The 3-factor model explained 65.7% of community discharge and 81.9% of institutional discharge, the overall predictive accuracy being 74.7%. The corresponding figures for admission NIHSS alone were 58.6%, 70.9% and 65.4%.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

急性严重脑卒中后住院康复:美国国立卫生研究院脑卒中量表在出院目的地其他潜在预测因子中的预测价值
背景:对重症脑卒中住院患者康复后出院目的地预测因素的研究很少。康复入院NIHSS评分在其他可能的康复入院预测指标中的预测价值尚未研究。目的:本回顾性介入研究的目的是确定24小时和康复入院NIHSS评分在其他潜在的社会人口统计学、临床和功能预测因素中对出院目的地的预测准确性,这些预测因素是在康复入院时常规收集的。材料和方法:在一所大学医院专科住院康复病房招募了156名24小时NIHSS评分大于或等于15的连续康复者。在康复入院时,使用逻辑回归分析常规收集的与出院目的地(社区与机构)可能相关的变量。结果:社区康复者70例(44.9%),机构康复者86例(55.1%)。出院回家的患者更年轻,更经常仍在工作,急性期吞咽困难/管喂或DNR决定的发生率更低,从中风发作到入院康复的时间更短,入院时严重损害(NIHSS评分、轻瘫、忽视)和残疾(FIM评分、行动能力)更少,住院期间功能改善速度更快、更显著。结论:社区出院对入院康复影响最大的独立预测因子是入院时NIHSS评分较低、活动能力和年龄较小,其中NIHSS影响最大。NIHSS每增加1分,出院到社区的几率下降16.1%。三因素模型对社区和机构出院的解释率分别为65.7%和81.9%,总体预测准确率为74.7%。仅NIHSS入院的相应数据分别为58.6%、70.9%和65.4%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信