Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure.

Q3 Medicine
Aylin Garip Kuebler, Siegfried Priglinger, Lukas Reznicek
{"title":"Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure.","authors":"Aylin Garip Kuebler,&nbsp;Siegfried Priglinger,&nbsp;Lukas Reznicek","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effects of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (mCPC) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on endothelial cell density (ECD) and reduction of the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary-open angle glaucoma (POAG).</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>In this observational, retrospective study, 40 eyes with POAG were included. Patients were divided into three groups-group I was treated with SLT (<i>n</i> = 13), group II was treated with mCPC (<i>n</i> = 13), and group III included age-matched patients with medically treated glaucoma (<i>n</i> = 14) (control group). In both treatment groups (SLT and mCPC) preoperative and postoperative findings of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ECD, and IOP were compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean time interval before and after the treatment was 215 ± 120 days in group I (SLT) and 273 ± 177 days in group II (mCPC). The follow-up for group III (control group) was 209 ± 103 days. In both treatment groups (SLT and mCPC) there was a statistically significant reduction of the IOP postoperatively (group I: 3.5 ± 3.7 mm Hg (<i>p</i> = 0.005) and group II: 4.3 ± 4.1 mm Hg (<i>p</i> = 0.003)). The mean IOP for group III was 12.9 ± 3.7 mm Hg at visit 1 and did not change significantly (<i>p</i> = 0.353) at visit 2. In all three groups, there was no statistically significant change in ECD at the last visit.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>According to our results, both SLT and mCPC seem to be effective in lowering the IOP, without showing any statistically significant effect on ECD in patients with POAG.However, larger and longer-term studies are necessary to understand the effects of the SLT and mCPC procedures on ECD.</p><p><strong>How to cite this article: </strong>Garip Kuebler A, Priglinger S, Reznicek L. Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(1):40-43.</p>","PeriodicalId":15419,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice","volume":"17 1","pages":"40-43"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/6a/f0/jocgp-17-40.PMC10203327.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10078-1393","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effects of micropulse transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (mCPC) and selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) on endothelial cell density (ECD) and reduction of the intraocular pressure (IOP) in patients with primary-open angle glaucoma (POAG).

Patients and methods: In this observational, retrospective study, 40 eyes with POAG were included. Patients were divided into three groups-group I was treated with SLT (n = 13), group II was treated with mCPC (n = 13), and group III included age-matched patients with medically treated glaucoma (n = 14) (control group). In both treatment groups (SLT and mCPC) preoperative and postoperative findings of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), ECD, and IOP were compared to the control group.

Results: The mean time interval before and after the treatment was 215 ± 120 days in group I (SLT) and 273 ± 177 days in group II (mCPC). The follow-up for group III (control group) was 209 ± 103 days. In both treatment groups (SLT and mCPC) there was a statistically significant reduction of the IOP postoperatively (group I: 3.5 ± 3.7 mm Hg (p = 0.005) and group II: 4.3 ± 4.1 mm Hg (p = 0.003)). The mean IOP for group III was 12.9 ± 3.7 mm Hg at visit 1 and did not change significantly (p = 0.353) at visit 2. In all three groups, there was no statistically significant change in ECD at the last visit.

Conclusion: According to our results, both SLT and mCPC seem to be effective in lowering the IOP, without showing any statistically significant effect on ECD in patients with POAG.However, larger and longer-term studies are necessary to understand the effects of the SLT and mCPC procedures on ECD.

How to cite this article: Garip Kuebler A, Priglinger S, Reznicek L. Micropulse Cyclophotocoagulation vs Selective Laser Trabeculoplasty: Effects on Corneal Endothelial Cells and Intraocular Pressure. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(1):40-43.

微脉冲周期光凝与选择性激光小梁成形术:对角膜内皮细胞和眼压的影响。
目的:评价微脉冲经巩膜睫状体光凝术(mPCC)和选择性激光小梁成形术(SLT)对原发性开角型青光眼(POAG)患者内皮细胞密度(ECD)和眼压降低(IOP)的影响。患者分为三组,第一组接受SLT治疗(n=13),第二组接受mPCC治疗(n=14),第三组包括年龄匹配的药物治疗青光眼患者(n=14,对照组)。在两个治疗组(SLT和mPCC)中,将最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、ECD和IOP的术前和术后结果与对照组进行比较。结果:治疗前后的平均时间间隔I组(SLT)为215±120天,II组(mPCC)为273±177天。第三组(对照组)随访209±103天。在两个治疗组(SLT和mPCC)中,术后眼压均有统计学意义的降低(I组:3.5±3.7 mm Hg(p=0.005)和II组:4.3±4.1 mm Hg(p=0.003))。第III组的平均眼压在第1次就诊时为12.9±3.7 mm汞柱,在第2次就诊时没有显著变化(p=0.353)。在所有三组中,最后一次就诊时ECD没有统计学上的显著变化。结论:根据我们的研究结果,SLT和mPCC似乎都能有效降低IOP,但对POAG患者的ECD没有任何统计学上的显著影响。然而,有必要进行更大规模和更长期的研究来了解SLT和CPC程序对ECD的影响。如何引用这篇文章:Garip Kuebler A,Priglinger S,Reznicek L。微脉冲周期光凝与选择性激光小梁成形术:对角膜内皮细胞和眼压的影响。青光眼临床杂志2023;17(1):40-43。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice
Journal of Current Glaucoma Practice Medicine-Ophthalmology
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信