The Significance of Inter-Eye Osmolarity Difference in Dry Eye Diagnostics.

IF 1.8 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Christian Nilsen, Per Graae Jensen, Morten Gundersen, Øygunn A Utheim, Bjørn Gjerdrum, Kjell Gunnar Gundersen, David Jahanlu, Rick Potvin
{"title":"The Significance of Inter-Eye Osmolarity Difference in Dry Eye Diagnostics.","authors":"Christian Nilsen,&nbsp;Per Graae Jensen,&nbsp;Morten Gundersen,&nbsp;Øygunn A Utheim,&nbsp;Bjørn Gjerdrum,&nbsp;Kjell Gunnar Gundersen,&nbsp;David Jahanlu,&nbsp;Rick Potvin","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S402556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of inter-eye osmolarity differences in relation to dry eye symptoms and other non-osmolar signs of dry eye disease.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>One hundred ninety one participants who attended a larger interventional study of dry eye disease prior to and after cataract surgery were analyzed for dry eye disease (DED). Dry eye diagnostics were performed for all subjects according to the DEWS II criteria: tear osmolarity was collected from both eyes with the TearLab system, non-invasive Tear film break up time (NIKBUT) was obtained on the test eye with Keratograph and ocular surface staining (OSS) was evaluated using the Oxford schema. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to assess symptoms. Inter-eye osmolarity greater than 8, which is considered as a sign of DED according to the TearLab user manual, was evaluated and compared with other non-osmolar signs of DED.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 191 subjects were divided into three groups according to osmolarity measurements. Sixty-five subjects had normal osmolarity (below 308 mOsmol/L in both eyes and less than 9 mOsmol/L difference between the eyes), 107 had high osmolarity (308 mOsmol/L or higher in one of the eyes) and 19 had an inter-eye difference >8 mOsmol/L or higher, with neither eye having osmolarity higher than 307 mOsmol/L. Signs and symptoms in this last group were not correlated with the high osmolarity group or the normal group, though they appeared more similar to the normal group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The diagnostic value of inter-eye osmolarity difference in predicting symptoms or other non-osmolar signs of dry eyes appears weak. Our study suggests that the criterion of an inter-eye difference of 8 mOsmol/L is not a useful cut-off for diagnosing dry eyes based on osmolarity.</p>","PeriodicalId":10442,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology","volume":"17 ","pages":"829-835"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/2d/8f/opth-17-829.PMC10015967.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S402556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of inter-eye osmolarity differences in relation to dry eye symptoms and other non-osmolar signs of dry eye disease.

Patients and methods: One hundred ninety one participants who attended a larger interventional study of dry eye disease prior to and after cataract surgery were analyzed for dry eye disease (DED). Dry eye diagnostics were performed for all subjects according to the DEWS II criteria: tear osmolarity was collected from both eyes with the TearLab system, non-invasive Tear film break up time (NIKBUT) was obtained on the test eye with Keratograph and ocular surface staining (OSS) was evaluated using the Oxford schema. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire was used to assess symptoms. Inter-eye osmolarity greater than 8, which is considered as a sign of DED according to the TearLab user manual, was evaluated and compared with other non-osmolar signs of DED.

Results: The 191 subjects were divided into three groups according to osmolarity measurements. Sixty-five subjects had normal osmolarity (below 308 mOsmol/L in both eyes and less than 9 mOsmol/L difference between the eyes), 107 had high osmolarity (308 mOsmol/L or higher in one of the eyes) and 19 had an inter-eye difference >8 mOsmol/L or higher, with neither eye having osmolarity higher than 307 mOsmol/L. Signs and symptoms in this last group were not correlated with the high osmolarity group or the normal group, though they appeared more similar to the normal group.

Conclusion: The diagnostic value of inter-eye osmolarity difference in predicting symptoms or other non-osmolar signs of dry eyes appears weak. Our study suggests that the criterion of an inter-eye difference of 8 mOsmol/L is not a useful cut-off for diagnosing dry eyes based on osmolarity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

眼间渗透压差在干眼诊断中的意义。
目的:本研究的目的是评估眼间渗透压差异对干眼病症状和其他非渗透压体征的诊断价值。患者和方法:191名在白内障手术前后参加干眼病介入研究的参与者被分析为干眼病(DED)。根据DEWS II标准对所有受试者进行干眼诊断:使用TearLab系统收集双眼泪液渗透压,使用角膜摄影仪获得测试眼的无创泪膜破裂时间(NIKBUT),使用Oxford模式评估眼表染色(OSS)。眼表疾病指数(OSDI)问卷用于评估症状。根据TearLab用户手册,对大于8的眼间渗透压进行评估,并与DED的其他非渗透压体征进行比较。结果:191例受试者按渗透压测定分为3组。65名受试者渗透压正常(双眼渗透压低于308 mOsmol/L,双眼渗透压差小于9 mOsmol/L), 107名受试者渗透压高(单眼渗透压高于308 mOsmol/L), 19名受试者眼间渗透压差>8 mOsmol/L或更高,两眼渗透压均不高于307 mOsmol。最后一组的体征和症状与高渗透压组或正常组没有相关性,尽管它们看起来与正常组更相似。结论:眼间渗透压差对预测干眼症症状或其他非渗透性体征的诊断价值较弱。我们的研究表明,8 mOsmol/L的眼间差标准不是基于渗透压诊断干眼症的有用截止值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical ophthalmology
Clinical ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.10%
发文量
499
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信