Migraine care practices in primary care: results from a national US survey.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Elisabeth Callen, Tarin Clay, Jillian Alai, Paul Crawford, Adam Visconti, Andrea Nederveld, Inez Cruz, Bailey Perez, Karen L Roper, Tamara K Oser, May-Lorie Saint Laurent, Yalda Jabbarpour
{"title":"Migraine care practices in primary care: results from a national US survey.","authors":"Elisabeth Callen, Tarin Clay, Jillian Alai, Paul Crawford, Adam Visconti, Andrea Nederveld, Inez Cruz, Bailey Perez, Karen L Roper, Tamara K Oser, May-Lorie Saint Laurent, Yalda Jabbarpour","doi":"10.1093/fampra/cmad054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary care clinicians play a critical role in diagnosis and treatment of migraine, yet barriers exist. This national survey assessed barriers to diagnosis and treatment of migraine, preferred approaches to receiving migraine education, and familiarity with recent therapeutic innovations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The survey was created by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and Eli Lilly and Company and distributed to a national sample through the AAFP National Research Network and affiliated PBRNs from mid-April through the end of May 2021. Initial analyses were descriptive statistics, ANOVAs, and Chi-Square tests. Individual and multivariate models were completed for: adult patients seen in a week; respondent years since residency; and adult patients with migraine seen in a week.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Respondents who saw fewer patients were more likely to indicate unclear patient histories were a barrier to diagnosing. Respondents who saw more patients with migraine were more likely to indicate the priority of other comorbidities and insufficient time were barriers to diagnosing. Respondents who had been out of residency longer were more likely to change a treatment plan due to attack impact, quality of life, and medication cost. Respondents who had been out of residency shorter were more likely to prefer to learn from migraine/headache research scientists and use paper headache diaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Results demonstrate differences in familiarity with migraine diagnosis and treatment options based on patients seen and years since residency. To maximise appropriate diagnosis within primary care, targeted efforts to increase familiarity and decrease barriers to migraine care should be implemented.</p>","PeriodicalId":12209,"journal":{"name":"Family practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmad054","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary care clinicians play a critical role in diagnosis and treatment of migraine, yet barriers exist. This national survey assessed barriers to diagnosis and treatment of migraine, preferred approaches to receiving migraine education, and familiarity with recent therapeutic innovations.

Methods: The survey was created by the American Academy of Family Physicians (AAFP) and Eli Lilly and Company and distributed to a national sample through the AAFP National Research Network and affiliated PBRNs from mid-April through the end of May 2021. Initial analyses were descriptive statistics, ANOVAs, and Chi-Square tests. Individual and multivariate models were completed for: adult patients seen in a week; respondent years since residency; and adult patients with migraine seen in a week.

Results: Respondents who saw fewer patients were more likely to indicate unclear patient histories were a barrier to diagnosing. Respondents who saw more patients with migraine were more likely to indicate the priority of other comorbidities and insufficient time were barriers to diagnosing. Respondents who had been out of residency longer were more likely to change a treatment plan due to attack impact, quality of life, and medication cost. Respondents who had been out of residency shorter were more likely to prefer to learn from migraine/headache research scientists and use paper headache diaries.

Conclusions: Results demonstrate differences in familiarity with migraine diagnosis and treatment options based on patients seen and years since residency. To maximise appropriate diagnosis within primary care, targeted efforts to increase familiarity and decrease barriers to migraine care should be implemented.

基层医疗机构的偏头痛护理实践:美国全国调查的结果。
背景:初级保健临床医生在偏头痛的诊断和治疗中发挥着至关重要的作用,但仍存在障碍。这项全国性调查评估了偏头痛诊断和治疗的障碍、接受偏头痛教育的首选方法以及对最新治疗创新的熟悉程度:该调查由美国家庭医生学会(AAFP)和礼来公司共同发起,于2021年4月中旬至5月底通过AAFP国家研究网络和附属PBRN向全国样本发放。初步分析包括描述性统计、方差分析和齐次方检验。针对以下因素建立了单个和多变量模型:一周内接诊的成人患者;受访者的住院年限;一周内接诊的偏头痛成人患者:结果:接诊患者较少的受访者更有可能表示患者病史不清是诊断的障碍。接诊偏头痛患者较多的受访者更有可能表示其他并发症和时间不足是诊断的障碍。离开住院医生岗位时间较长的受访者更有可能因偏头痛发作的影响、生活质量和药物费用而改变治疗方案。离开住院医生岗位时间较短的受访者更倾向于向偏头痛/头痛研究科学家学习,并使用纸质头痛日记:结论:研究结果表明,不同的受访者对偏头痛诊断和治疗方案的熟悉程度存在差异。为了最大限度地在初级保健中进行适当诊断,应采取有针对性的措施,提高对偏头痛的熟悉程度,减少偏头痛治疗的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Family practice
Family practice 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
144
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Family Practice is an international journal aimed at practitioners, teachers, and researchers in the fields of family medicine, general practice, and primary care in both developed and developing countries. Family Practice offers its readership an international view of the problems and preoccupations in the field, while providing a medium of instruction and exploration. The journal''s range and content covers such areas as health care delivery, epidemiology, public health, and clinical case studies. The journal aims to be interdisciplinary and contributions from other disciplines of medicine and social science are always welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信