Large-scale evaluation of a computer-based learning program to increase prison staff knowledge on geriatric and end-of-life care.

IF 1.1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
International Journal of Prisoner Health Pub Date : 2022-06-02 Epub Date: 2022-03-29 DOI:10.1108/IJPH-08-2021-0078
Valerie Harwell Myers, Susan Loeb, Erin Kitt-Lewis, Tiffany Jerrod
{"title":"Large-scale evaluation of a computer-based learning program to increase prison staff knowledge on geriatric and end-of-life care.","authors":"Valerie Harwell Myers, Susan Loeb, Erin Kitt-Lewis, Tiffany Jerrod","doi":"10.1108/IJPH-08-2021-0078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study is to continue research and development of the ECAD-P learning system with an emphasis on developing a scalable unit for testing in a larger number of more diverse correctional settings. There are almost 2.3 million US persons incarcerated. Geriatric and end-of-life (EOL) care in corrections is not as equitable as care in the free world. Technological delivery of geriatric training to staff through computer-based learning (CBL) offers a novel approach to improve care and reduce disparities among those who are most vulnerable during confinement.</p><p><strong>Design/methodology/approach: </strong>This mixed methods study built an interactive CBL for multidisciplinary staff to address EOL and geriatric issues in prisons. The CBL was iteratively built and tested prior to launching a full-scale evaluation using a pre/post-intervention design.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Evaluation of the CBL occurred at 7 sites (i.e. 6 state prisons and 1 prison health-care vendor). A total of 241 staff were recruited with 173 completing post-tests. Outcomes were knowledge acquisition regarding care for aging and dying incarcerated persons (i.e. cognitive measure) and attitudes, motivations and values for providing care (i.e. affective measure). Cognitive and affective post-tests were significantly better than at pre-test (all ps < 0.01). ANCOVAs revealed no significant differences for sex or ethnicity.</p><p><strong>Originality/value: </strong>Outcomes reveal that the CBL is acceptable, feasible and usable in corrections. Staff improved their knowledge after receiving the training. Correctional settings face increasing pressures to better address the health care and management needs of aged, chronically ill and dying incarcerated persons. This e-learning holds promise to contribute to better preparation of corrections staff to effectively care for these populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":45561,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Prisoner Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9707343/pdf/nihms-1850681.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Prisoner Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPH-08-2021-0078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to continue research and development of the ECAD-P learning system with an emphasis on developing a scalable unit for testing in a larger number of more diverse correctional settings. There are almost 2.3 million US persons incarcerated. Geriatric and end-of-life (EOL) care in corrections is not as equitable as care in the free world. Technological delivery of geriatric training to staff through computer-based learning (CBL) offers a novel approach to improve care and reduce disparities among those who are most vulnerable during confinement.

Design/methodology/approach: This mixed methods study built an interactive CBL for multidisciplinary staff to address EOL and geriatric issues in prisons. The CBL was iteratively built and tested prior to launching a full-scale evaluation using a pre/post-intervention design.

Findings: Evaluation of the CBL occurred at 7 sites (i.e. 6 state prisons and 1 prison health-care vendor). A total of 241 staff were recruited with 173 completing post-tests. Outcomes were knowledge acquisition regarding care for aging and dying incarcerated persons (i.e. cognitive measure) and attitudes, motivations and values for providing care (i.e. affective measure). Cognitive and affective post-tests were significantly better than at pre-test (all ps < 0.01). ANCOVAs revealed no significant differences for sex or ethnicity.

Originality/value: Outcomes reveal that the CBL is acceptable, feasible and usable in corrections. Staff improved their knowledge after receiving the training. Correctional settings face increasing pressures to better address the health care and management needs of aged, chronically ill and dying incarcerated persons. This e-learning holds promise to contribute to better preparation of corrections staff to effectively care for these populations.

Abstract Image

对基于计算机的学习项目进行大规模评估,以增加监狱工作人员对老年病和临终关怀的了解。
目的:本研究的目的是继续研究和开发 ECAD-P 学习系统,重点是开发一个可扩展的单元,以便在更多不同的惩教环境中进行测试。美国有近 230 万名在押人员。监狱中的老年病治疗和临终关怀(EOL)不如自由世界中的治疗公平。通过基于计算机的学习(CBL)向工作人员提供老年医学培训的技术为改善护理和减少那些在监禁期间最易受伤害的人之间的差异提供了一种新方法:这项混合方法研究为多学科工作人员建立了一个交互式 CBL,以解决监狱中的临终关怀和老年问题。在采用干预前/干预后设计启动全面评估之前,对 CBL 进行了反复构建和测试:在 7 个地点(即 6 所州立监狱和 1 个监狱保健供应商)对 CBL 进行了评估。共招募了 241 名工作人员,其中 173 人完成了后测。结果是获得了有关老年和临终囚犯护理的知识(即认知测量)以及提供护理的态度、动机和价值观(即情感测量)。认知和情感方面的后测结果明显优于前测结果(所有数据均小于 0.01)。方差分析显示,性别或种族差异不明显:原创性/价值:结果表明,社区学习法在惩教工作中是可接受的、可行的和可用的。工作人员在接受培训后提高了知识水平。惩教机构面临着越来越大的压力,需要更好地满足高龄、慢性病和临终囚犯的医疗保健和管理需求。这种电子学习方式有望帮助管教人员更好地做好准备,有效地照顾这些人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Prisoner Health
International Journal of Prisoner Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
21.40%
发文量
56
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信