Fast Track Surgery as the Latest Multimodal Strategy of Enhanced Recovery after Urethroplasty.

IF 1.8 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Vladimir Beloborodov, Vladimir Vorobev, Temirlan Hovalyg, Igor Seminskiy, Svetlana Sokolova, Ekaterina Lapteva, Aleksandr Mankov
{"title":"Fast Track Surgery as the Latest Multimodal Strategy of Enhanced Recovery after Urethroplasty.","authors":"Vladimir Beloborodov,&nbsp;Vladimir Vorobev,&nbsp;Temirlan Hovalyg,&nbsp;Igor Seminskiy,&nbsp;Svetlana Sokolova,&nbsp;Ekaterina Lapteva,&nbsp;Aleksandr Mankov","doi":"10.1155/2023/2205306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Fast track surgery (FTS), as well as ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery/rapid recovery programs), is the latest multimodal treatment strategy, designed to reduce the disability period and improve the medical care quality. The study aims to analyze the enhanced recovery protocol effectiveness in a comparative study of elective urethral stricture surgery. A prospective study included 54 patients with an established diagnosis of urethral stricture in 2019-2020 in the urological hospital of the Irkutsk City Clinical Hospital No. 1. All 54 patients have completed the study. There were two groups of patients FTS-group (group II, <i>n</i> = 25) and standard group (group I, <i>n</i> = 29). In terms of preoperative parameters, the comparison groups have statistical homogeneity. The comparative intergroup efficacy analysis of the treatment based on the criteria established in the study demonstrated good treatment results for 5 (17.2%) patients of group I and 20 (80%) patients of group II (<i>p</i>=0.004). The overall efficacy of urethroplasty surgeries, regardless of the treatment protocol, was comparable (86.2% vs 92%; <i>p</i>=0.870), as well as the likelihood of relapse within two years (<i>p</i>=0.512). The predictors of recurrence were technical complications and urethral suture failure (OR 4.36; 95% CI 1.6; 7.11; <i>p</i>=0.002). The FTS protocol reduced the treatment period (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and decreased the severity of postoperative pain (<i>p</i> < 0.001). The use of the \"fast track surgery\" protocol in urethroplasty with generally similar treatment results makes it possible to achieve a better functional and objective condition of patients in the postoperative period due to less pain, shorter catheterization, and hospitalization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7490,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10195176/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2205306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Fast track surgery (FTS), as well as ERAS (enhanced recovery after surgery/rapid recovery programs), is the latest multimodal treatment strategy, designed to reduce the disability period and improve the medical care quality. The study aims to analyze the enhanced recovery protocol effectiveness in a comparative study of elective urethral stricture surgery. A prospective study included 54 patients with an established diagnosis of urethral stricture in 2019-2020 in the urological hospital of the Irkutsk City Clinical Hospital No. 1. All 54 patients have completed the study. There were two groups of patients FTS-group (group II, n = 25) and standard group (group I, n = 29). In terms of preoperative parameters, the comparison groups have statistical homogeneity. The comparative intergroup efficacy analysis of the treatment based on the criteria established in the study demonstrated good treatment results for 5 (17.2%) patients of group I and 20 (80%) patients of group II (p=0.004). The overall efficacy of urethroplasty surgeries, regardless of the treatment protocol, was comparable (86.2% vs 92%; p=0.870), as well as the likelihood of relapse within two years (p=0.512). The predictors of recurrence were technical complications and urethral suture failure (OR 4.36; 95% CI 1.6; 7.11; p=0.002). The FTS protocol reduced the treatment period (p < 0.001) and decreased the severity of postoperative pain (p < 0.001). The use of the "fast track surgery" protocol in urethroplasty with generally similar treatment results makes it possible to achieve a better functional and objective condition of patients in the postoperative period due to less pain, shorter catheterization, and hospitalization.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

快速通道手术是提高尿道成形术后恢复的最新多模式策略。
快速通道手术(FTS)以及ERAS(术后增强恢复/快速恢复计划)是最新的多模式治疗策略,旨在缩短残疾期并提高医疗质量。本研究旨在分析选择性尿道狭窄手术中增强恢复方案的有效性。一项前瞻性研究纳入了伊尔库茨克市第一临床医院泌尿科医院2019-2020年确诊为尿道狭窄的54例患者。所有54名患者都完成了研究。两组患者分为fts组(II组,n = 25)和标准组(I组,n = 29)。在术前参数方面,各组具有统计学上的同质性。根据本研究建立的标准对治疗进行组间疗效比较分析,I组5例(17.2%)、II组20例(80%)患者治疗效果良好(p=0.004)。无论治疗方案如何,输尿管成形术的总体疗效是相当的(86.2% vs 92%;P =0.870),以及2年内复发的可能性(P =0.512)。预测复发的因素是技术性并发症和尿道缝合失败(OR 4.36;95% ci 1.6;7.11;p = 0.002)。FTS方案缩短了治疗时间(p < 0.001),降低了术后疼痛的严重程度(p < 0.001)。在尿道成形术中使用“快速通道手术”方案,治疗效果大致相似,由于疼痛更少,导尿时间更短,住院时间更短,术后患者的功能和客观状况更好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Urology
Advances in Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊介绍: Advances in Urology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes state-of-the-art reviews and original research papers of wide interest in all fields of urology. The journal strives to provide publication of important manuscripts to the widest possible audience worldwide, without the constraints of expensive, hard-to-access, traditional bound journals. Advances in Urology is designed to improve publication access of both well-established urologic scientists and less well-established writers, by allowing interested scientists worldwide to participate fully.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信