Geographic variation in point of care ultrasound provision: results from a national audit.

IF 3.4 Q2 Medicine
Sunil Aggarwal, Reshma Shanmugam, Thomas Knight, Catherine Atkin, Sarbjit Clare, Nicholas Smallwood, Daniel Lasserson
{"title":"Geographic variation in point of care ultrasound provision: results from a national audit.","authors":"Sunil Aggarwal,&nbsp;Reshma Shanmugam,&nbsp;Thomas Knight,&nbsp;Catherine Atkin,&nbsp;Sarbjit Clare,&nbsp;Nicholas Smallwood,&nbsp;Daniel Lasserson","doi":"10.1186/s13089-023-00314-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is an emerging consensus that point-of-care ultrasound is an essential skill in acute care. This is reflected in recent changes to the Acute Internal Medicine curriculum in the UK. The need to develop and maintain specific ultrasound competencies is now a mandatory component of training. There is a degree of uncertainty as to how existing training infrastructure can best accommodate these changes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were obtained from the latest annual Society for Acute Medicine Benchmarking Audit 2021. All Acute Medical Units in the UK are eligible to participate. Data pertaining to the number of ultrasound machines and number of clinicians that regularly use point of care ultrasound were collected. This was used to develop a series of maps demonstrating variation in provision at the national level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 123 AMUs responded to the questions related to ultrasound prevalence and numbers of trained clinicians. Of these, 78.9% (97/123) reported having access to at least one ultrasound machine. There was at least one clinician that regularly used ultrasound in 81 responding hospitals (65.9%). There was significant geographic heterogeneity in the use of ultrasound and availability of accredited supervisors. At a regional level, ultrasound expertise is typically concentrated within a relatively small number of hospitals.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Geographic variation in the use of ultrasound and availability of registered supervisors represents a significant challenge to ultrasound training provision at the national level. Targeted interventions in areas with less developed training infrastructure, such as regional training hubs may be required to ensure more equitable access to training opportunities.</p>","PeriodicalId":36911,"journal":{"name":"Ultrasound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10030694/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ultrasound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-023-00314-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is an emerging consensus that point-of-care ultrasound is an essential skill in acute care. This is reflected in recent changes to the Acute Internal Medicine curriculum in the UK. The need to develop and maintain specific ultrasound competencies is now a mandatory component of training. There is a degree of uncertainty as to how existing training infrastructure can best accommodate these changes.

Methods: Data were obtained from the latest annual Society for Acute Medicine Benchmarking Audit 2021. All Acute Medical Units in the UK are eligible to participate. Data pertaining to the number of ultrasound machines and number of clinicians that regularly use point of care ultrasound were collected. This was used to develop a series of maps demonstrating variation in provision at the national level.

Results: In total, 123 AMUs responded to the questions related to ultrasound prevalence and numbers of trained clinicians. Of these, 78.9% (97/123) reported having access to at least one ultrasound machine. There was at least one clinician that regularly used ultrasound in 81 responding hospitals (65.9%). There was significant geographic heterogeneity in the use of ultrasound and availability of accredited supervisors. At a regional level, ultrasound expertise is typically concentrated within a relatively small number of hospitals.

Conclusion: Geographic variation in the use of ultrasound and availability of registered supervisors represents a significant challenge to ultrasound training provision at the national level. Targeted interventions in areas with less developed training infrastructure, such as regional training hubs may be required to ensure more equitable access to training opportunities.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

护理点超声提供的地理差异:来自国家审计的结果。
背景:有一个新兴的共识,即点护理超声是一项必要的技能,在急性护理。这反映在最近的变化急性内科课程在英国。发展和保持特定超声能力的需要现在是培训的强制性组成部分。对于现有的培训基础设施如何能够最好地适应这些变化,存在一定程度的不确定性。方法:数据来自最新的年度急性医学基准审计学会2021。联合王国所有急症医疗单位都有资格参加。收集了有关超声机器数量和经常使用护理点超声的临床医生数量的数据。这被用来制作一系列地图,显示国家一级的供应情况的差异。结果:共有123名AMUs回答了有关超声患病率和培训临床医生数量的问题。其中,78.9%(97/123)报告至少使用过一台超声仪。81家受访医院(65.9%)至少有1名临床医生定期使用超声检查。超声的使用和合格监护人员的可用性存在显著的地理异质性。在区域一级,超声波专家通常集中在相对少数的医院。结论:超声使用的地理差异和注册监督员的可用性对国家层面的超声培训提供构成了重大挑战。可能需要在培训基础设施较不发达的地区(如区域培训中心)采取有针对性的干预措施,以确保更公平地获得培训机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ultrasound Journal
Ultrasound Journal Health Professions-Radiological and Ultrasound Technology
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
2.90%
发文量
45
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信