What shapes local health system actors' thinking and action on social inequalities in health? A meta-ethnography.

IF 1.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL
Social Theory & Health Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-01-31 DOI:10.1057/s41285-022-00176-6
Naoimh E McMahon
{"title":"What shapes local health system actors' thinking and action on social inequalities in health? A meta-ethnography.","authors":"Naoimh E McMahon","doi":"10.1057/s41285-022-00176-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Local health systems are increasingly tasked to play a more central role in driving action to reduce social inequalities in health. Past experience, however, has demonstrated the challenge of reorienting health system actions towards prevention and the wider determinants of health. In this review, I use meta-ethnographic methods to synthesise findings from eleven qualitative research studies that have examined how ambitions to tackle social inequalities in health take shape within local health systems. The resulting line-of-argument illustrates how such inequalities continue to be problematised in narrow and reductionist ways to fit both with pre-existing conceptions of health, and the institutional practices which shape thinking and action. Instances of health system actors adopting a more social view of inequalities, and taking a more active role in influencing the social and structural determinants of health, were attributed to the beliefs and values of system leaders, and their ability to push-back against dominant discourses and institutional norms. This synthesised account provides an additional layer of understanding about the specific challenges experienced by health workforces when tasked to address this complex and enduring problem, and provides essential insights for understanding the success and shortcomings of future cross-sectoral efforts to tackle social inequalities in health.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41285-022-00176-6.</p>","PeriodicalId":46551,"journal":{"name":"Social Theory & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8801929/pdf/","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Theory & Health","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41285-022-00176-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Local health systems are increasingly tasked to play a more central role in driving action to reduce social inequalities in health. Past experience, however, has demonstrated the challenge of reorienting health system actions towards prevention and the wider determinants of health. In this review, I use meta-ethnographic methods to synthesise findings from eleven qualitative research studies that have examined how ambitions to tackle social inequalities in health take shape within local health systems. The resulting line-of-argument illustrates how such inequalities continue to be problematised in narrow and reductionist ways to fit both with pre-existing conceptions of health, and the institutional practices which shape thinking and action. Instances of health system actors adopting a more social view of inequalities, and taking a more active role in influencing the social and structural determinants of health, were attributed to the beliefs and values of system leaders, and their ability to push-back against dominant discourses and institutional norms. This synthesised account provides an additional layer of understanding about the specific challenges experienced by health workforces when tasked to address this complex and enduring problem, and provides essential insights for understanding the success and shortcomings of future cross-sectoral efforts to tackle social inequalities in health.

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1057/s41285-022-00176-6.

Abstract Image

是什么塑造了地方卫生系统行动者对健康方面的社会不平等的思考和行动?元民族志。
地方卫生系统越来越多地被要求在推动减少卫生方面社会不平等的行动方面发挥更核心的作用。然而,过去的经验表明,将卫生系统的行动方向重新调整为预防和更广泛的健康决定因素是一项挑战。在这篇综述中,我使用元人种学方法综合了11项定性研究的结果,这些研究考察了解决健康方面社会不平等的雄心是如何在当地卫生系统中形成的。由此产生的论点说明了这种不平等是如何继续以狭隘和简化主义的方式被问题化的,以符合预先存在的健康概念,以及塑造思维和行动的制度实践。卫生系统行动者对不平等采取更具社会性的观点,并在影响健康的社会和结构决定因素方面发挥更积极的作用,这些例子归因于系统领导人的信仰和价值观,以及他们反击主流话语和制度规范的能力。这篇综合报道为了解卫生工作者在处理这一复杂而持久的问题时所面临的具体挑战提供了一层额外的理解,并为理解未来跨部门解决卫生领域社会不平等问题的成功与不足提供了重要的见解。补充信息:在线版本包含补充材料,可访问10.1057/s41285-022-00176-6。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Social Theory & Health
Social Theory & Health SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Social Theory & Health provides an international scholarly forum for theoretical reflection and debate on contemporary health issues, many of which bear directly on the planning and delivery of services. The journal aims to consolidate, refine and extend theoretically informed work on the role of health in modern societies. Interest in issues of theory and health now informs many academic and practice-oriented disciplines and crosses discipline boundaries. The Editors encourage contributions from all relevant disciplines, as well as from those involved directly in front-line treatment and care. Contributions from the developing world are particularly welcome. The journal aims to include contributions from all theoretical perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信