Professional perspectives on serodiscordant family service provision in the context of blood-borne viruses.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Kerryn Drysdale, Asha Persson, Anthony K J Smith, Jack Wallace, Kylie Valentine, Rebecca M Gray, Joanne Bryant, Myra Hamilton, Christy E Newman
{"title":"Professional perspectives on serodiscordant family service provision in the context of blood-borne viruses.","authors":"Kerryn Drysdale,&nbsp;Asha Persson,&nbsp;Anthony K J Smith,&nbsp;Jack Wallace,&nbsp;Kylie Valentine,&nbsp;Rebecca M Gray,&nbsp;Joanne Bryant,&nbsp;Myra Hamilton,&nbsp;Christy E Newman","doi":"10.1080/14461242.2022.2110922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recognition of the broader relational aspects of viral infections, family support is considered important when someone is diagnosed with a blood-borne virus (BBV), such as HIV, hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B (HBV). However, families' own support needs are often not a priority in service provision within the BBV sector. In this article, we draw on qualitative interviews with 20 key informants working in various professional capacities in health, social policy, care and advocacy sectors in Australia, and explore their experiences and perspectives on family inclusivity in their services. Overall, key informants acknowledged the diversity of what constitutes family, and consistently viewed family engagement as beneficial to both diagnosed individuals and the wider familial networks affected by a diagnosis. However, prioritising individual care in support services presented barriers to engaging families, which are further complicated by the role of stigma in shaping the social realities of living with a BBV. Increasing understanding in service provision settings that serodiscordance can be a family experience has the potential to widen this analytic lens to consider the support needs of families in their own right.</p>","PeriodicalId":46833,"journal":{"name":"Health Sociology Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Sociology Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14461242.2022.2110922","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In recognition of the broader relational aspects of viral infections, family support is considered important when someone is diagnosed with a blood-borne virus (BBV), such as HIV, hepatitis C (HCV) and hepatitis B (HBV). However, families' own support needs are often not a priority in service provision within the BBV sector. In this article, we draw on qualitative interviews with 20 key informants working in various professional capacities in health, social policy, care and advocacy sectors in Australia, and explore their experiences and perspectives on family inclusivity in their services. Overall, key informants acknowledged the diversity of what constitutes family, and consistently viewed family engagement as beneficial to both diagnosed individuals and the wider familial networks affected by a diagnosis. However, prioritising individual care in support services presented barriers to engaging families, which are further complicated by the role of stigma in shaping the social realities of living with a BBV. Increasing understanding in service provision settings that serodiscordance can be a family experience has the potential to widen this analytic lens to consider the support needs of families in their own right.

血源性病毒背景下血清不协调家庭服务提供的专业观点。
认识到病毒感染的更广泛的关系方面,当有人被诊断患有血源性病毒(BBV),如艾滋病毒、丙型肝炎(HCV)和乙型肝炎(HBV)时,家庭支持被认为是重要的。然而,家庭自身的支持需求往往不是BBV部门提供服务的优先事项。在本文中,我们对20名在澳大利亚卫生、社会政策、护理和宣传部门从事各种专业工作的关键举报人进行了定性访谈,并探讨了他们在服务中对家庭包容性的经验和观点。总体而言,关键信息提供者承认家庭构成的多样性,并始终认为家庭参与对诊断个体和受诊断影响的更广泛的家庭网络都是有益的。然而,在支持服务中优先考虑个人护理给家庭参与带来了障碍,而在塑造与BBV一起生活的社会现实中,耻辱的作用使情况进一步复杂化。在提供服务的环境中,越来越多地认识到血清不一致可能是一种家庭经历,这有可能扩大这一分析视角,以考虑家庭本身的支持需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: An international, scholarly peer-reviewed journal, Health Sociology Review explores the contribution of sociology and sociological research methods to understanding health and illness; to health policy, promotion and practice; and to equity, social justice, social policy and social work. Health Sociology Review is published in association with The Australian Sociological Association (TASA) under the editorship of Eileen Willis. Health Sociology Review publishes original theoretical and research articles, literature reviews, special issues, symposia, commentaries and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信