Investigating environmental parameters involved in psychosis etiopathology. Translation and test-retest reliability of four scales.

Q3 Medicine
Konstantinos Kollias, Pentagiotissas Stefanatou, Lida-Alkisti Xenaki, Ilias Vlachos, Vanessa Ermiliou, Christos Theleritis, Ioannis Kosteletos, Nikos Stefanis
{"title":"Investigating environmental parameters involved in psychosis etiopathology. Translation and test-retest reliability of four scales.","authors":"Konstantinos Kollias,&nbsp;Pentagiotissas Stefanatou,&nbsp;Lida-Alkisti Xenaki,&nbsp;Ilias Vlachos,&nbsp;Vanessa Ermiliou,&nbsp;Christos Theleritis,&nbsp;Ioannis Kosteletos,&nbsp;Nikos Stefanis","doi":"10.22365/jpsych.2022.102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>First Episode Psychosis (FEP) emergence and clinical outcome might be attributed to various parameters, wherein gene - environment interaction plays a pivotal role in. Four specified psychometric tools, that have been used for the evaluation of possible environmental, social and psychological parameters involved in the etiopathology and clinical course of psychosis are the following: Social Environment Assessment Tool (SEAT), Discrimination (DISC), Brief Core-Schema Scales (BCSS) and Life-Threatening Events-Brief Life-Events Questionnaire (LTE-Q). These tools were used in the Athens-FEP Study assessment schedule, which investigates the gene-environment interaction among patients presenting with FEP. The goal of the present study is to present them in regard to their content, their use in international literature, their translation in Greek, and their test-retest reliability. SEAT, DISC and BCSS were provided to the Athens FEP Study by the European Network of National Schizophrenia Network studying Gene-Environment interactions (EUGEI) research project. LTE-Q was already translated into Greek and was selected as befitting the purposes of the FEP-Study. The EUGEI instruments were translated into Greek language by two independent translators for each instrument. All translators were qualified in the administration of the English version of the scales after being trained online through a comprehensive work-package training set provided by the EUGEI. The principal investigator of the Athens-FEP project checked and approved the final versions of the questionnaires. The four tools were administered to 32 subjects, all diagnosed with FEP, participating in the Athens-FEP project. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the agreement between scores of the four questionnaires after first and second administration. The scales were administered to our subjects twice, with an intermediate period of three weeks between the first and second administrations, by three qualified researchers. There was a statistically significant agreement for almost all measurements of the four questionnaires, except for the frequency dimension of DISC. Agreement between those measurements was very high (ICCs>0.8). Our study is an indication that the Greek versions of the psychometric tools are reliable, although a more thorough test of their psychometric properties is needed. All four questionnaires have unique properties that differentiate them from other similar tools. Moreover, the DISC is the only discrimination scale translated into Greek. More importantly, the translated questionnaires are part of a broad, well-established research package of psychometric tools, suitable for the evaluation of environmental risk factors potentially involved in early psychosis, which might represent a valuable scientific resource in the Greek research field.</p>","PeriodicalId":20741,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22365/jpsych.2022.102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

First Episode Psychosis (FEP) emergence and clinical outcome might be attributed to various parameters, wherein gene - environment interaction plays a pivotal role in. Four specified psychometric tools, that have been used for the evaluation of possible environmental, social and psychological parameters involved in the etiopathology and clinical course of psychosis are the following: Social Environment Assessment Tool (SEAT), Discrimination (DISC), Brief Core-Schema Scales (BCSS) and Life-Threatening Events-Brief Life-Events Questionnaire (LTE-Q). These tools were used in the Athens-FEP Study assessment schedule, which investigates the gene-environment interaction among patients presenting with FEP. The goal of the present study is to present them in regard to their content, their use in international literature, their translation in Greek, and their test-retest reliability. SEAT, DISC and BCSS were provided to the Athens FEP Study by the European Network of National Schizophrenia Network studying Gene-Environment interactions (EUGEI) research project. LTE-Q was already translated into Greek and was selected as befitting the purposes of the FEP-Study. The EUGEI instruments were translated into Greek language by two independent translators for each instrument. All translators were qualified in the administration of the English version of the scales after being trained online through a comprehensive work-package training set provided by the EUGEI. The principal investigator of the Athens-FEP project checked and approved the final versions of the questionnaires. The four tools were administered to 32 subjects, all diagnosed with FEP, participating in the Athens-FEP project. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to assess the agreement between scores of the four questionnaires after first and second administration. The scales were administered to our subjects twice, with an intermediate period of three weeks between the first and second administrations, by three qualified researchers. There was a statistically significant agreement for almost all measurements of the four questionnaires, except for the frequency dimension of DISC. Agreement between those measurements was very high (ICCs>0.8). Our study is an indication that the Greek versions of the psychometric tools are reliable, although a more thorough test of their psychometric properties is needed. All four questionnaires have unique properties that differentiate them from other similar tools. Moreover, the DISC is the only discrimination scale translated into Greek. More importantly, the translated questionnaires are part of a broad, well-established research package of psychometric tools, suitable for the evaluation of environmental risk factors potentially involved in early psychosis, which might represent a valuable scientific resource in the Greek research field.

调查与精神疾病病因有关的环境参数。四种量表的翻译和重测信度。
首发精神病(FEP)的出现和临床结局可能与多种因素有关,其中基因-环境相互作用在其中起着关键作用。四种特定的心理测量工具,用于评估可能涉及精神病病因病理学和临床过程的环境,社会和心理参数:社会环境评估工具(SEAT),歧视(DISC),简短核心-图式量表(BCSS)和生命威胁事件-简短生活事件问卷(LTE-Q)。这些工具用于Athens-FEP研究评估计划,该计划调查FEP患者的基因-环境相互作用。本研究的目的是介绍它们的内容,它们在国际文学中的使用,它们在希腊文中的翻译,以及它们的重测可靠性。SEAT、DISC和BCSS由欧洲国家精神分裂症网络研究基因-环境相互作用(EUGEI)研究项目提供给雅典FEP研究。LTE-Q已经被翻译成希腊语,并被选择为符合fep研究的目的。EUGEI乐器由两名独立翻译人员翻译成希腊语。所有的翻译人员在接受了由全球环境评估所提供的一整套综合工作培训的在线培训后,都具备了管理英文比额表的资格。Athens-FEP项目的首席研究员检查并批准了问卷的最终版本。参与Athens-FEP项目的32名被诊断为FEP的受试者使用了这四种工具。使用类内相关系数(ICCs)评估第一次和第二次给药后四份问卷得分之间的一致性。这些量表由三名合格的研究人员对我们的受试者进行了两次管理,在第一次和第二次管理之间有三周的中间时间。除了DISC的频率维度外,四份问卷的几乎所有测量结果在统计学上都具有显著的一致性。这些测量结果之间的一致性非常高(ICCs>0.8)。我们的研究表明,希腊版本的心理测量工具是可靠的,尽管需要对其心理测量特性进行更彻底的测试。所有四个问卷都有独特的属性,使它们区别于其他类似的工具。此外,DISC是唯一翻译成希腊语的歧视量表。更重要的是,翻译的问卷是广泛的,完善的心理测量工具研究包的一部分,适用于评估可能涉及早期精神病的环境风险因素,这可能是希腊研究领域的宝贵科学资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki
Psychiatrike = Psychiatriki Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信