Suicide Risk Assessment, Management, and Mitigation in the Emergency Setting.

Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) Pub Date : 2023-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-01-16 DOI:10.1176/appi.focus.20220072
Seth Powsner, Deborah Goebert, Janet S Richmond, Junji Takeshita
{"title":"Suicide Risk Assessment, Management, and Mitigation in the Emergency Setting.","authors":"Seth Powsner, Deborah Goebert, Janet S Richmond, Junji Takeshita","doi":"10.1176/appi.focus.20220072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Suicide is a serious public health issue and is a leading cause of death worldwide. Suicidal ideation is a common presentation in emergency department (ED) settings, with many nuanced complications. Therefore, understanding screening, assessment, and mitigation is paramount to successful encounters with individuals presenting to emergency settings in psychiatric crises. Screening helps to identify the few people at risk within a large group. Assessment seeks to decide whether a specific individual is at significant risk. Mitigation aims to reduce the risk of suicide or of a serious attempt for a person at risk. These aims cannot be achieved with perfect reliability, but some approaches are more effective than others. Suicide screening specifics are important, even to individual practitioners, because a positive screen triggers assessment. Most practitioners understand assessment well: beginning with early psychiatric training, they are taught signs and symptoms suggesting that a patient might be at risk of suicide. Mitigating suicide risk is increasingly important to reduce the misery of ED boarding for patients awaiting psychiatric admission. For many patients, hospital admission is unnecessary if support, monitoring, and contingency plans are workable. For any individual patient, there may be a complicated mix of findings, risks, and interventions. Evidence-based screening and assessment tools are inadequate for the possible complexities, making care of individual patients dependent on good clinical assessment. The authors review the available evidence and offer experienced recommendations for challenges not yet thoroughly researched.</p>","PeriodicalId":73036,"journal":{"name":"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10172543/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.focus.20220072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Suicide is a serious public health issue and is a leading cause of death worldwide. Suicidal ideation is a common presentation in emergency department (ED) settings, with many nuanced complications. Therefore, understanding screening, assessment, and mitigation is paramount to successful encounters with individuals presenting to emergency settings in psychiatric crises. Screening helps to identify the few people at risk within a large group. Assessment seeks to decide whether a specific individual is at significant risk. Mitigation aims to reduce the risk of suicide or of a serious attempt for a person at risk. These aims cannot be achieved with perfect reliability, but some approaches are more effective than others. Suicide screening specifics are important, even to individual practitioners, because a positive screen triggers assessment. Most practitioners understand assessment well: beginning with early psychiatric training, they are taught signs and symptoms suggesting that a patient might be at risk of suicide. Mitigating suicide risk is increasingly important to reduce the misery of ED boarding for patients awaiting psychiatric admission. For many patients, hospital admission is unnecessary if support, monitoring, and contingency plans are workable. For any individual patient, there may be a complicated mix of findings, risks, and interventions. Evidence-based screening and assessment tools are inadequate for the possible complexities, making care of individual patients dependent on good clinical assessment. The authors review the available evidence and offer experienced recommendations for challenges not yet thoroughly researched.

急诊环境中的自杀风险评估、管理和缓解。
自杀是一个严重的公共卫生问题,也是导致全球死亡的主要原因之一。自杀意念是急诊科(ED)常见的一种症状,具有许多细微的并发症。因此,了解筛查、评估和缓解措施是成功应对急诊室精神危机患者的关键。筛查有助于在一大群人中找出少数有风险的人。评估旨在确定特定个人是否面临重大风险。缓解措施旨在降低高危人群自杀或严重企图自杀的风险。这些目标不可能完全可靠地实现,但有些方法比其他方法更有效。自杀筛查的具体内容非常重要,甚至对个别从业人员来说也是如此,因为筛查结果呈阳性就会触发评估。大多数从业人员都非常了解评估:从早期的精神科培训开始,他们就接受了提示病人可能有自杀风险的迹象和症状的教育。降低自杀风险对于减少等待精神科入院的患者在急诊室住院的痛苦越来越重要。对于许多病人来说,如果支持、监控和应急计划可行,就没有必要入院治疗。对于任何一名患者,都可能存在复杂的调查结果、风险和干预措施。以证据为基础的筛查和评估工具不足以应对可能出现的复杂情况,因此对个别患者的护理有赖于良好的临床评估。作者回顾了现有的证据,并针对尚未深入研究的难题提出了有经验的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信