Emerging roles and opportunities for rare disease patient advocacy groups.

Therapeutic advances in rare disease Pub Date : 2023-04-24 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/26330040231164425
Amy M Patterson, Megan O'Boyle, Grace E VanNoy, Kira A Dies
{"title":"Emerging roles and opportunities for rare disease patient advocacy groups.","authors":"Amy M Patterson, Megan O'Boyle, Grace E VanNoy, Kira A Dies","doi":"10.1177/26330040231164425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patient advocacy groups (PAGs) serve a vital role for rare disease patients and families by providing educational resources, support, and a sense of community. Motivated by patient need, PAGs are increasingly at the forefront of policy, research, and drug development for their disease of interest.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The study explored the current landscape of PAGs in order to guide new and existing PAGs on available resources and challenges to research engagement. We aim to inform industry, advocates, and healthcare personnel about PAG achievements and ways they are increasingly involved in research.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We chose PAGs from the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Coalition for Patient Advocacy Groups (CPAG) listserv and the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) 'Find a patient organization'.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed eligible PAG leaders about the demographics, goals, and research activities of their organization. For analysis, PAGs were bucketed by size, age, prevalence of disease, and budget. Data were de-identified for cross-tabulation and multinomial logistic regression analysis with R.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Research engagement was an extremely important goal for most PAGs (81%), though ultra-rare disease and high-budget PAGs were most likely to cite it as the top priority. In total, 79% reported research engagement in some capacity, including registries, translational research, and clinical trials. 'Ultra-rare' PAGs were less likely than 'rare' PAGs to have an ongoing clinical trial.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While PAGs of varying sizes, budgets, and maturity levels reported an interest in research, limited funding and lack of disease awareness continue to create barriers to achieving their goals. While support tools exist to make research more accessible, often their utility depends on the funding, sustainability, maturity of the PAG itself, and the level of investment of collaborators. Despite the availability of current support systems, there are challenges related to both the start-up and sustainability of patient-centric research efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":75218,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic advances in rare disease","volume":"4 ","pages":"26330040231164425"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/49/cc/10.1177_26330040231164425.PMC10184204.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic advances in rare disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/26330040231164425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patient advocacy groups (PAGs) serve a vital role for rare disease patients and families by providing educational resources, support, and a sense of community. Motivated by patient need, PAGs are increasingly at the forefront of policy, research, and drug development for their disease of interest.

Objectives: The study explored the current landscape of PAGs in order to guide new and existing PAGs on available resources and challenges to research engagement. We aim to inform industry, advocates, and healthcare personnel about PAG achievements and ways they are increasingly involved in research.

Design: We chose PAGs from the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (RDCRN) Coalition for Patient Advocacy Groups (CPAG) listserv and the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) 'Find a patient organization'.

Methods: We surveyed eligible PAG leaders about the demographics, goals, and research activities of their organization. For analysis, PAGs were bucketed by size, age, prevalence of disease, and budget. Data were de-identified for cross-tabulation and multinomial logistic regression analysis with R.

Results: Research engagement was an extremely important goal for most PAGs (81%), though ultra-rare disease and high-budget PAGs were most likely to cite it as the top priority. In total, 79% reported research engagement in some capacity, including registries, translational research, and clinical trials. 'Ultra-rare' PAGs were less likely than 'rare' PAGs to have an ongoing clinical trial.

Conclusion: While PAGs of varying sizes, budgets, and maturity levels reported an interest in research, limited funding and lack of disease awareness continue to create barriers to achieving their goals. While support tools exist to make research more accessible, often their utility depends on the funding, sustainability, maturity of the PAG itself, and the level of investment of collaborators. Despite the availability of current support systems, there are challenges related to both the start-up and sustainability of patient-centric research efforts.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

罕见病患者权益组织的新兴角色和机遇。
背景:患者权益团体 (PAG) 通过提供教育资源、支持和社区感,为罕见病患者和家庭发挥着重要作用。在患者需求的推动下,患者权益团体越来越多地站在其所关注疾病的政策、研究和药物开发的最前沿:本研究探讨了 PAG 目前的状况,以指导新成立和现有的 PAG 了解可用资源和参与研究面临的挑战。我们旨在向业界、倡导者和医疗保健人员介绍 PAG 的成就以及他们越来越多地参与研究的方式:设计:我们从罕见病临床研究网络 (RDCRN) 患者权益团体联盟 (CPAG) 列表服务器和美国国家罕见疾病组织 (NORD) 的 "查找患者组织 "中选择了患者权益团体:我们对符合条件的 PAG 领导者进行了调查,了解其组织的人口统计、目标和研究活动。为了便于分析,我们按照规模、年龄、疾病流行率和预算对 PAG 进行了分类。对数据进行去标识处理,以便使用 R 进行交叉表和多项式逻辑回归分析:对大多数 PAGs(81%)而言,参与研究是一项极其重要的目标,但超罕见疾病和高预算 PAGs 最有可能将其列为首要任务。共有 79% 的 PAG 报告以某种身份参与了研究,包括登记、转化研究和临床试验。与 "罕见 "PAG相比,"超罕见 "PAG不太可能有正在进行的临床试验:虽然不同规模、预算和成熟度的 PAG 都表示对研究感兴趣,但有限的资金和缺乏对疾病的认识仍然是实现其目标的障碍。虽然支持工具的存在使研究更容易获得,但其效用往往取决于资金、可持续性、PAG 自身的成熟度以及合作者的投资水平。尽管目前有支持系统,但以患者为中心的研究工作在启动和可持续性方面仍面临挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信