Prognosis of Elderly Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer without Serosal Invasion.

Ho Gun Kim, Jae Hyuk Lee, Dong Yi Kim
{"title":"Prognosis of Elderly Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer without Serosal Invasion.","authors":"Ho Gun Kim,&nbsp;Jae Hyuk Lee,&nbsp;Dong Yi Kim","doi":"10.37029/jcas.v8i2.467","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The impact of age on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of elderly advanced gastric cancer patients without serosal invasion compared to their younger counterparts.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We retrospectively evaluated 43 elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer without serosal invasion. The clinicopathologic findings were compared between the elderly (age >70 years) and young (age <36 years) patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Significantly higher numbers of elderly patients had tumours with differentiated histology, whereas more young patients had tumours with undifferentiated histology (<i>P</i> < 0.01). Curability (risk ratio, 3.122; confidence interval, 1.242-4.779; <i>P</i> < 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor of survival. The 5-year survival rates were not significantly different between the elderly and the young patients according to the absence of serosal invasion (80.0% vs. 77.9%; <i>P</i> = 0.654) and undergoing curative resection (82.0% vs. 78.9%; <i>P</i> = 0.312). Meanwhile, among the elderly patients, those who underwent curative resection had a better survival rate than those with non-curative resection (82.0% vs. 67.8%; <i>P</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer without serosal invasion do not have a worse prognosis than their younger counterparts, indicating that age does not impact the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer. The important prognostic factor was whether the patients underwent curative resection.</p>","PeriodicalId":73631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","volume":"8 2","pages":"467"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/28/05/JCAS-8-467.PMC10187596.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37029/jcas.v8i2.467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The impact of age on the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer is controversial. This study aimed to investigate the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of elderly advanced gastric cancer patients without serosal invasion compared to their younger counterparts.

Materials and methods: We retrospectively evaluated 43 elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer without serosal invasion. The clinicopathologic findings were compared between the elderly (age >70 years) and young (age <36 years) patients.

Results: Significantly higher numbers of elderly patients had tumours with differentiated histology, whereas more young patients had tumours with undifferentiated histology (P < 0.01). Curability (risk ratio, 3.122; confidence interval, 1.242-4.779; P < 0.001) was an independent prognostic factor of survival. The 5-year survival rates were not significantly different between the elderly and the young patients according to the absence of serosal invasion (80.0% vs. 77.9%; P = 0.654) and undergoing curative resection (82.0% vs. 78.9%; P = 0.312). Meanwhile, among the elderly patients, those who underwent curative resection had a better survival rate than those with non-curative resection (82.0% vs. 67.8%; P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer without serosal invasion do not have a worse prognosis than their younger counterparts, indicating that age does not impact the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer. The important prognostic factor was whether the patients underwent curative resection.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

无浆膜侵犯的老年晚期胃癌患者预后分析。
导读:年龄对胃癌患者预后的影响一直存在争议。本研究旨在探讨无浆膜侵犯的老年晚期胃癌患者与年轻晚期胃癌患者的临床病理特征及预后。材料与方法:回顾性分析43例高龄无浆膜侵犯的晚期胃癌患者。比较老年(>70岁)和年轻(>70岁)患者的临床病理表现。结果:老年患者组织学分化率明显高于年轻患者组织学未分化率(P < 0.01)。治愈率(风险比,3.122;置信区间为1.242-4.779;P < 0.001)是独立的预后因素。根据有无浆膜侵犯,老年和年轻患者的5年生存率无显著差异(80.0% vs 77.9%;P = 0.654)和行根治性切除(82.0% vs. 78.9%;P = 0.312)。同时,在老年患者中,行根治性切除的生存率高于非根治性切除的生存率(82.0% vs 67.8%;P < 0.001)。结论:老年无浆膜侵犯的晚期胃癌患者的预后并不比年轻患者差,说明年龄不影响晚期胃癌的预后。重要的预后因素是患者是否接受根治性切除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信