Chronic Use of Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: Are We Asking the Right Question?

Jose M Rubio, Mercedes Perez-Rodriguez
{"title":"Chronic Use of Antipsychotics in Schizophrenia: Are We Asking the Right Question?","authors":"Jose M Rubio,&nbsp;Mercedes Perez-Rodriguez","doi":"10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>There is an ongoing debate about the potential risks and benefits of long-term antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia. The data for and against the chronic use of these medicines is mostly indirect, either from observational studies potentially exposed to reverse causation bias or randomized controlled studies that do not cover beyond 2-3 years. We propose that perseverating on the question of what positive or negative outcomes are causally associated with chronic antipsychotic treatment may not lead to better answers than the limited ones that we have, given the limited feasibility of more conclusive studies. Rather, we argue that addressing the research question of the risks and benefits of antipsychotic discontinuation from a perspective of personalized medicine, can be more productive and meaningful to people living with schizophrenia. To this end, research that can quantify the risk of relapse after treatment continuation for a given individual should be prioritized. We make the case that clinically feasible neuroimaging biomarkers have demonstrated promise in related paradigms, and that could be offering a way past this long debate on the risks and benefits of chronic antipsychotic use.</p>","PeriodicalId":21348,"journal":{"name":"Schizophrenia Bulletin Open","volume":"3 1","pages":"sgac059"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/f0/bc/sgac059.PMC9577501.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schizophrenia Bulletin Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/schizbullopen/sgac059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is an ongoing debate about the potential risks and benefits of long-term antipsychotic treatment in schizophrenia. The data for and against the chronic use of these medicines is mostly indirect, either from observational studies potentially exposed to reverse causation bias or randomized controlled studies that do not cover beyond 2-3 years. We propose that perseverating on the question of what positive or negative outcomes are causally associated with chronic antipsychotic treatment may not lead to better answers than the limited ones that we have, given the limited feasibility of more conclusive studies. Rather, we argue that addressing the research question of the risks and benefits of antipsychotic discontinuation from a perspective of personalized medicine, can be more productive and meaningful to people living with schizophrenia. To this end, research that can quantify the risk of relapse after treatment continuation for a given individual should be prioritized. We make the case that clinically feasible neuroimaging biomarkers have demonstrated promise in related paradigms, and that could be offering a way past this long debate on the risks and benefits of chronic antipsychotic use.

精神分裂症患者长期使用抗精神病药物:我们是否问对了问题?
关于精神分裂症长期抗精神病药物治疗的潜在风险和益处一直存在争议。支持和反对长期使用这些药物的数据大多是间接的,要么来自可能存在反向因果偏倚的观察性研究,要么来自不超过2-3年的随机对照研究。鉴于更多结论性研究的有限可行性,我们建议,在慢性抗精神病药物治疗与哪些积极或消极结果有因果关系的问题上坚持不懈,可能不会得到比我们现有的有限答案更好的答案。相反,我们认为,从个性化医疗的角度来解决抗精神病药物停药的风险和益处的研究问题,对精神分裂症患者来说可能更有成效和意义。为此,应该优先考虑能够量化特定个体在继续治疗后复发风险的研究。我们认为,临床可行的神经成像生物标志物已经在相关范例中展示了前景,这可能为长期以来关于慢性抗精神病药物使用的风险和益处的争论提供了一条途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信