Efficacy of Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-life Experience and Outcome from a Tertiary Care Centre.

Journal of cancer & allied specialties Pub Date : 2021-05-31 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.37029/jcas.v7i2.409
Samia Yasmeen, Farah Arshad, Sabah Shaukat, Farhana Badar, Syed Ather Saeed Kazmi, Usman Ahmad
{"title":"Efficacy of Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced and Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: A Real-life Experience and Outcome from a Tertiary Care Centre.","authors":"Samia Yasmeen,&nbsp;Farah Arshad,&nbsp;Sabah Shaukat,&nbsp;Farhana Badar,&nbsp;Syed Ather Saeed Kazmi,&nbsp;Usman Ahmad","doi":"10.37029/jcas.v7i2.409","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>To report response rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with different available chemotherapeutic regimens over 10 years.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This is a retrospective observational study. All patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, from January 2008 to December 2017 were studied. Data were collected from the hospital information system. The characteristics and outcomes of all the patients were analysed. PFS and OS were also estimated. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were applied, and SPSS version 20 was used for data analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-seven subjects with a median age of 56 years (range 21-76) were included. Sixty-two (71%) subjects were male. The most common tumour location was the head of the pancreas in 46 (53%) of all the subjects. Sixty-three (72%) subjects had elevated carbohydrate antigen-19.9 values. About 47 (54%) subjects had locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), and 40 (46%) subjects had MPC. Chemotherapy regimens used were FOLFIRINOX in 23 (26%), gemcitabine (GEM) based in 66 (65%) and capecitabine (CAP) based in 8 (9%) of the subjects. One (1%) subject had a complete response, 12 (14%) had a partial response, 10 (11%) had stable disease and 59 (68%) of the subjects had progressive disease. The objective response rate (ORR) was 15% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 26%. In MPC, the ORR was 10%, DCR was 18% and tumour progression was seen in 72% of the patients, while in LAPC, the ORR was 19.1, DCR 34% and tumour progression was documented in 64% of the patients, respectively. The FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy regimen had better ORR, DCR and lesser number of progressions as compared to GEM- and CAP-based chemotherapy regimens. The median PFS of the whole group was 32 weeks, and the median OS was 54 weeks. The PFS was significantly higher for LAPC (39 weeks) as compared to the MPC group (25 weeks) (<i>P</i> = 0.028). There was no statistically significant difference between the OS of these two groups (<i>P</i> = 0.451). In addition, PFS was significantly higher with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy as compared to the other chemotherapy regimens. Regarding OS, there was no statistically significant difference among all chemotherapy regimen groups (<i>P</i> = 0.267).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Based on our results, FOLFIRINOX remained the most effective chemotherapy regimen despite the dose modifications and toxicities in all groups, indicating that modified FOLFIRINOX could be considered as a first-line regimen in Southeast Asian population.</p>","PeriodicalId":73631,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","volume":"7 2","pages":"e409"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1a/3c/JCAS-7-409.PMC10166315.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cancer & allied specialties","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37029/jcas.v7i2.409","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction: To report response rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with different available chemotherapeutic regimens over 10 years.

Materials and methods: This is a retrospective observational study. All patients with locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) at Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, from January 2008 to December 2017 were studied. Data were collected from the hospital information system. The characteristics and outcomes of all the patients were analysed. PFS and OS were also estimated. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test were applied, and SPSS version 20 was used for data analysis.

Results: Eighty-seven subjects with a median age of 56 years (range 21-76) were included. Sixty-two (71%) subjects were male. The most common tumour location was the head of the pancreas in 46 (53%) of all the subjects. Sixty-three (72%) subjects had elevated carbohydrate antigen-19.9 values. About 47 (54%) subjects had locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), and 40 (46%) subjects had MPC. Chemotherapy regimens used were FOLFIRINOX in 23 (26%), gemcitabine (GEM) based in 66 (65%) and capecitabine (CAP) based in 8 (9%) of the subjects. One (1%) subject had a complete response, 12 (14%) had a partial response, 10 (11%) had stable disease and 59 (68%) of the subjects had progressive disease. The objective response rate (ORR) was 15% and the disease control rate (DCR) was 26%. In MPC, the ORR was 10%, DCR was 18% and tumour progression was seen in 72% of the patients, while in LAPC, the ORR was 19.1, DCR 34% and tumour progression was documented in 64% of the patients, respectively. The FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy regimen had better ORR, DCR and lesser number of progressions as compared to GEM- and CAP-based chemotherapy regimens. The median PFS of the whole group was 32 weeks, and the median OS was 54 weeks. The PFS was significantly higher for LAPC (39 weeks) as compared to the MPC group (25 weeks) (P = 0.028). There was no statistically significant difference between the OS of these two groups (P = 0.451). In addition, PFS was significantly higher with FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy as compared to the other chemotherapy regimens. Regarding OS, there was no statistically significant difference among all chemotherapy regimen groups (P = 0.267).

Conclusion: Based on our results, FOLFIRINOX remained the most effective chemotherapy regimen despite the dose modifications and toxicities in all groups, indicating that modified FOLFIRINOX could be considered as a first-line regimen in Southeast Asian population.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

局部晚期和转移性癌症化疗的疗效:来自三级护理中心的现实经验和结果。
简介:报告10年来接受不同化疗方案治疗的晚期癌症患者的有效率、无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。材料和方法:这是一项回顾性观察研究。对2008年1月至2017年12月在巴基斯坦拉合尔Shaukat Khanum纪念癌症医院和研究中心的所有局部晚期和转移性癌症(MPC)患者进行研究。数据来自医院信息系统。对所有患者的特征和结果进行了分析。还估算了PFS和OS。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和对数秩检验,采用SPSS 20进行数据分析。结果:87名受试者的中位年龄为56岁(21-76岁)。62名(71%)受试者为男性。在所有受试者中,最常见的肿瘤位置是胰头(53%)。六十三名(72%)受试者的碳水化合物抗原-19.9值升高。约47名(54%)受试者患有局部晚期癌症(LAPC),40名(46%)受试人员患有MPC。使用的化疗方案为23例(26%)的FOLFIRINOX,66例(65%)的吉西他滨(GEM)和8例(9%)的卡培他滨(CAP)。一名(1%)受试者有完全反应,12名(14%)受试人有部分反应,10名(11%)患者病情稳定,59名(68%)受试人员病情进展。客观缓解率(ORR)为15%,疾病控制率(DCR)为26%。MPC的ORR为10%,DCR为18%,72%的患者出现肿瘤进展,而LAPC的ORR分别为19.1,DCR 34%,64%的患者出现了肿瘤进展。与基于GEM和CAP的化疗方案相比,FOLFIRINOX化疗方案具有更好的ORR、DCR和更少的进展次数。整个组的中位PFS为32周,中位OS为54周。LAPC(39周)的PFS显著高于MPC组(25周)(P=0.028)。这两组的OS之间没有统计学上的显著差异(P=0.451)。此外,与其他化疗方案相比,FOLFIRINOX化疗的PFS显著更高。关于OS,所有化疗方案组之间没有统计学上的显著差异(P=0.267)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信