Recruitment and retention in mobile application-based intervention studies: a critical synopsis of challenges and opportunities.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Whitney Bremer, Abeed Sarker
{"title":"Recruitment and retention in mobile application-based intervention studies: a critical synopsis of challenges and opportunities.","authors":"Whitney Bremer,&nbsp;Abeed Sarker","doi":"10.1080/17538157.2022.2082297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Use of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) is becoming increasingly popular for the management of chronic illnesses, but mHealth-based intervention studies often have limitations associated with subject recruitment and retention. In this synopsis, we focus on targeted aspects of mHealth-based intervention studies, specifically: (i) subject recruitment, (ii) cohort sizes, and (iii) retention rates. We used the Google Scholar (meta-search) and Galileo search engines to identify sample articles focusing on <i>mHealth apps</i> and <i>interventions</i> published between 2010 and 2020 and selected 21 papers for detailed review. Most studies recruited relatively small cohorts (minimum: 20, maximum: 510). Retention rates had high variance with only five studies managing >80% subject retention throughout the study duration, 10.4% being the lowest. Eighty-five percent of the studies expressed concerns regarding study duration, app usage, and lack of proper implementation. The use of mHealth interventions generally yielded positive outcomes, but most studies discussed facing challenges associated with recruitment and retention. There is a clear need to identify strategies for recruiting larger cohorts and improving retention rates, and ultimately increasing the reliability of mHealth app-based intervention studies. We advise that potential underutilized opportunities lie at the intersection of mHealth and social media to address the limitations identified in the synopsis.</p>","PeriodicalId":54984,"journal":{"name":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Informatics for Health & Social Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17538157.2022.2082297","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Use of mobile health applications (mHealth apps) is becoming increasingly popular for the management of chronic illnesses, but mHealth-based intervention studies often have limitations associated with subject recruitment and retention. In this synopsis, we focus on targeted aspects of mHealth-based intervention studies, specifically: (i) subject recruitment, (ii) cohort sizes, and (iii) retention rates. We used the Google Scholar (meta-search) and Galileo search engines to identify sample articles focusing on mHealth apps and interventions published between 2010 and 2020 and selected 21 papers for detailed review. Most studies recruited relatively small cohorts (minimum: 20, maximum: 510). Retention rates had high variance with only five studies managing >80% subject retention throughout the study duration, 10.4% being the lowest. Eighty-five percent of the studies expressed concerns regarding study duration, app usage, and lack of proper implementation. The use of mHealth interventions generally yielded positive outcomes, but most studies discussed facing challenges associated with recruitment and retention. There is a clear need to identify strategies for recruiting larger cohorts and improving retention rates, and ultimately increasing the reliability of mHealth app-based intervention studies. We advise that potential underutilized opportunities lie at the intersection of mHealth and social media to address the limitations identified in the synopsis.

基于移动应用程序的干预研究中的招聘和保留:挑战和机遇的关键摘要。
使用移动健康应用程序(移动健康应用程序)管理慢性疾病正变得越来越流行,但基于移动健康的干预研究往往存在与受试者招募和保留相关的局限性。在本摘要中,我们重点关注基于移动健康的干预研究的目标方面,特别是:(i)受试者招募,(ii)队列大小,(iii)保留率。我们使用Google Scholar(元搜索)和Galileo搜索引擎来识别2010年至2020年间发表的专注于移动健康应用程序和干预措施的样本文章,并选择了21篇论文进行详细审查。大多数研究招募了相对较小的队列(最少20人,最多510人)。留用率有很大的差异,只有5项研究在整个研究期间保持了>80%的受试者留用率,最低的是10.4%。85%的研究表达了对学习时间、应用程序使用和缺乏适当实施的担忧。移动医疗干预措施的使用通常产生了积极的结果,但大多数研究讨论了与招聘和保留相关的挑战。显然需要确定招募更大的队列和提高保留率的策略,并最终提高基于移动健康应用程序的干预研究的可靠性。我们建议,潜在的未被充分利用的机会存在于移动医疗和社交媒体的交叉点,以解决摘要中确定的限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Informatics for Health & Social Care promotes evidence-based informatics as applied to the domain of health and social care. It showcases informatics research and practice within the many and diverse contexts of care; it takes personal information, both its direct and indirect use, as its central focus. The scope of the Journal is broad, encompassing both the properties of care information and the life-cycle of associated information systems. Consideration of the properties of care information will necessarily include the data itself, its representation, structure, and associated processes, as well as the context of its use, highlighting the related communication, computational, cognitive, social and ethical aspects. Consideration of the life-cycle of care information systems includes full range from requirements, specifications, theoretical models and conceptual design through to sustainable implementations, and the valuation of impacts. Empirical evidence experiences related to implementation are particularly welcome. Informatics in Health & Social Care seeks to consolidate and add to the core knowledge within the disciplines of Health and Social Care Informatics. The Journal therefore welcomes scientific papers, case studies and literature reviews. Examples of novel approaches are particularly welcome. Articles might, for example, show how care data is collected and transformed into useful and usable information, how informatics research is translated into practice, how specific results can be generalised, or perhaps provide case studies that facilitate learning from experience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信