Christos P Dimitroukas, Vasileios I Metaxas, Fotios O Efthymiou, Petros E Zampakis, George S Panayiotakis, Christina P Kalogeropoulou
{"title":"Non-dynamic and multiphase CT protocols for parathyroid glands imaging: a review of technical parameters, radiation dose and diagnostic accuracy.","authors":"Christos P Dimitroukas, Vasileios I Metaxas, Fotios O Efthymiou, Petros E Zampakis, George S Panayiotakis, Christina P Kalogeropoulou","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6507.22.03833-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our purpose was to review the scientific literature and collect information regarding clinical and technical parameters of different single- or multiphase CT protocols, their diagnostic performance and patient dose during parathyroid imaging.</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies investigating the diagnostic performance of CT in detecting parathyroid lesions and the corresponding patients' dose. The following information was retrieved for each article: CT system, number, combination and time interval between phases, scanning length, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, contrast enhancement in Hounsfield Units (HUs), technical and exposure parameters, and dose indices. Fifty studies published during the last sixteen years (2005-2021) were reviewed.</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>A large discrepancy in the number and combination of phases, as well as clinical and technical parameters of the CT protocols was indicated. The variations in patients' doses are mainly due to scanners' technology, number and combination of phases, the extent of scanning length, technical parameters (tube voltage, tube current modulation, pitch, reconstruction algorithms), and patient-related parameters. Technical parameters are not always adjusted appropriately to the clinical question or patient size. These variations indicate a large potential to optimize dose during parathyroid imaging without compromising diagnostic performance. The potential is to decrease the number of phases or use low tube voltage protocols, tube current modulation, iterative reconstruction, and reduce the scanning length during some phases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reporting results could inform researchers about the current status of CT parathyroid imaging and guide their future efforts to optimize both patients' dose and corresponding image quality.</p>","PeriodicalId":18690,"journal":{"name":"Minerva endocrinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6507.22.03833-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Our purpose was to review the scientific literature and collect information regarding clinical and technical parameters of different single- or multiphase CT protocols, their diagnostic performance and patient dose during parathyroid imaging.
Evidence acquisition: PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for studies investigating the diagnostic performance of CT in detecting parathyroid lesions and the corresponding patients' dose. The following information was retrieved for each article: CT system, number, combination and time interval between phases, scanning length, sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive and negative predictive values, contrast enhancement in Hounsfield Units (HUs), technical and exposure parameters, and dose indices. Fifty studies published during the last sixteen years (2005-2021) were reviewed.
Evidence synthesis: A large discrepancy in the number and combination of phases, as well as clinical and technical parameters of the CT protocols was indicated. The variations in patients' doses are mainly due to scanners' technology, number and combination of phases, the extent of scanning length, technical parameters (tube voltage, tube current modulation, pitch, reconstruction algorithms), and patient-related parameters. Technical parameters are not always adjusted appropriately to the clinical question or patient size. These variations indicate a large potential to optimize dose during parathyroid imaging without compromising diagnostic performance. The potential is to decrease the number of phases or use low tube voltage protocols, tube current modulation, iterative reconstruction, and reduce the scanning length during some phases.
Conclusions: The reporting results could inform researchers about the current status of CT parathyroid imaging and guide their future efforts to optimize both patients' dose and corresponding image quality.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
