Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Driven Ambulatory Aspirin Deprescribing Protocol.

Katherine Rothbauer, Magdalena Siodlak, Emma Dreischmeier, Trisha Seys Ranola, Lauren Welch
{"title":"Evaluation of a Pharmacist-Driven Ambulatory Aspirin Deprescribing Protocol.","authors":"Katherine Rothbauer,&nbsp;Magdalena Siodlak,&nbsp;Emma Dreischmeier,&nbsp;Trisha Seys Ranola,&nbsp;Lauren Welch","doi":"10.12788/fp.0294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recent guidelines indicate that aspirin affords less cardiovascular protection and greater bleeding risks in adults aged > 70 years. Deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications is particularly important in older adults, as this population experiences a high risk of adverse effects and polypharmacy. Limited data are available regarding targeted aspirin deprescribing approaches by pharmacists. The objective of this study was to implement and evaluate the success and feasibility of a pharmacist-led aspirin deprescribing protocol for older adults in a primary care setting.</p><p><strong>Observations: </strong>This prospective feasibility study in a US Department of Veterans Affairs ambulatory care pharmacy setting included patients aged ≥ 70 years with documented aspirin use. We reviewed 459 patient records and determined that 110 were eligible for deprescribing. A pharmacistinitiated telephone call was attempted for each eligible patient to discuss the risks and benefits of deprescribing aspirin. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reached for whom aspirin was discontinued. Secondary outcomes included patient rationale for declining deprescribing and the time to complete the intervention. Of 94 patients reached, 45 (48%) agreed to aspirin deprescribing, 3 (3%) agreed to dose reduction, and 29 (31%) declined the intervention. An additional 17 (18%) had previously stopped aspirin, which led to a medication reconciliation intervention. Pharmacists spent about 2 minutes per record review and 12 minutes on each encounter, including documentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementing a pharmacist-driven aspirin deprescribing protocol in a primary care setting led to the discontinuation of inappropriate aspirin prescribing in nearly half of older adults contacted. The protocol was well accepted by collaborating physicians and feasible for pharmacists to implement, with potential for further dissemination across primary care settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":73021,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"39 Suppl 5","pages":"S37-S41a"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10010494/pdf/fp-39-11s-s37.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recent guidelines indicate that aspirin affords less cardiovascular protection and greater bleeding risks in adults aged > 70 years. Deprescribing potentially inappropriate medications is particularly important in older adults, as this population experiences a high risk of adverse effects and polypharmacy. Limited data are available regarding targeted aspirin deprescribing approaches by pharmacists. The objective of this study was to implement and evaluate the success and feasibility of a pharmacist-led aspirin deprescribing protocol for older adults in a primary care setting.

Observations: This prospective feasibility study in a US Department of Veterans Affairs ambulatory care pharmacy setting included patients aged ≥ 70 years with documented aspirin use. We reviewed 459 patient records and determined that 110 were eligible for deprescribing. A pharmacistinitiated telephone call was attempted for each eligible patient to discuss the risks and benefits of deprescribing aspirin. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reached for whom aspirin was discontinued. Secondary outcomes included patient rationale for declining deprescribing and the time to complete the intervention. Of 94 patients reached, 45 (48%) agreed to aspirin deprescribing, 3 (3%) agreed to dose reduction, and 29 (31%) declined the intervention. An additional 17 (18%) had previously stopped aspirin, which led to a medication reconciliation intervention. Pharmacists spent about 2 minutes per record review and 12 minutes on each encounter, including documentation.

Conclusions: Implementing a pharmacist-driven aspirin deprescribing protocol in a primary care setting led to the discontinuation of inappropriate aspirin prescribing in nearly half of older adults contacted. The protocol was well accepted by collaborating physicians and feasible for pharmacists to implement, with potential for further dissemination across primary care settings.

药剂师驱动的门诊阿司匹林处方减少方案的评价。
背景:最近的指南指出,在年龄> 70岁的成年人中,阿司匹林提供的心血管保护较少,出血风险较大。对于老年人来说,解除可能不适当的药物处方尤其重要,因为这一人群有很高的不良反应和多重用药风险。可获得的关于药剂师的靶向阿司匹林处方方法的数据有限。本研究的目的是实施和评估初级保健机构中药师主导的老年人阿司匹林处方方案的成功和可行性。观察:这项前瞻性可行性研究在美国退伍军人事务部门诊药房进行,纳入了年龄≥70岁且有阿司匹林使用记录的患者。我们回顾了459例患者的记录,确定110例符合开处方的条件。药剂师发起的电话会议试图与每位符合条件的患者讨论阿司匹林处方的风险和益处。主要结局是停用阿司匹林的患者比例。次要结果包括患者减少处方的理由和完成干预的时间。在94名患者中,45名(48%)同意阿司匹林处方,3名(3%)同意减少剂量,29名(31%)拒绝干预。另有17人(18%)此前曾停止服用阿司匹林,这导致了药物和解干预。药剂师每次记录审查花费约2分钟,每次就诊花费12分钟,包括文件记录。结论:在初级保健机构实施药剂师驱动的阿司匹林减处方方案导致近一半的老年人停止了不适当的阿司匹林处方。该方案被合作医师广泛接受,药剂师也可以实施,具有在初级保健机构进一步推广的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信