Impact of various clinical factors on the final color of ceramic/glass-polymer based CAD-CAM materials.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
American journal of dentistry Pub Date : 2023-02-01
Sebnem Yilmaz, Ferhan Egilmez
{"title":"Impact of various clinical factors on the final color of ceramic/glass-polymer based CAD-CAM materials.","authors":"Sebnem Yilmaz,&nbsp;Ferhan Egilmez","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of material type, material thickness and cement shade on the final color of two different ceramic/glass-polymer-based CAD-CAM blocks over colored abutments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Tested blocks (Vita Enamic-VE and Cerasmart-Cs) were cut in three different thicknesses (1, 1.5 and 2 mm), and cemented on two different shaded (B1 and C3) resin discs with three shades (A2-Universal, W-White, T-Translucent) of a self-adhesive resin cement. An additional 10 specimens were prepared for control (n= 370). 36 subgroups were formed to simulate different clinical conditions (n= 10). The final color difference (ΔE₀₀) was recorded as the difference between material-cement-resin composite assembly and control specimens on a black background according to the CIEΔE 2000 color difference formula. Clinical perceptibility (0.80) and acceptability thresholds (1.80) were used to evaluate the results. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U non-parametric tests at P< 0.05 significance level.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ΔE₀₀ results were influenced by the polymer-based CAD-CAM material type, material thickness, and cement shade (P< 0.05) over both abutment shades. VE exhibited lower ΔE₀₀ values than Cs over B1 and C3 shaded abutments (for each abutment P< 0.001). Specimens of 1 mm thickness exhibited significantly higher ΔE₀₀ than the 2 mm or 1.5 mm specimens (P< 0.001), and W cement shade demonstrated higher ΔE₀₀ than T or A2 shades (P< 0.001) over both shaded abutments.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The final color of the polymer-based CAD-CAM restoration can be improved by the suitable combination of material/material thickness/cement shade to achieve the desired esthetic outcomes within clinically acceptable limits. Regardless of the type of polymer-based CAD-CAM material chosen, at least 1.5 mm restoration thickness with the use of Translucent or A2 cement shade is recommended for masking whitened or darkened shaded abutment teeth in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7538,"journal":{"name":"American journal of dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of material type, material thickness and cement shade on the final color of two different ceramic/glass-polymer-based CAD-CAM blocks over colored abutments.

Methods: Tested blocks (Vita Enamic-VE and Cerasmart-Cs) were cut in three different thicknesses (1, 1.5 and 2 mm), and cemented on two different shaded (B1 and C3) resin discs with three shades (A2-Universal, W-White, T-Translucent) of a self-adhesive resin cement. An additional 10 specimens were prepared for control (n= 370). 36 subgroups were formed to simulate different clinical conditions (n= 10). The final color difference (ΔE₀₀) was recorded as the difference between material-cement-resin composite assembly and control specimens on a black background according to the CIEΔE 2000 color difference formula. Clinical perceptibility (0.80) and acceptability thresholds (1.80) were used to evaluate the results. Data were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis and the Mann-Whitney U non-parametric tests at P< 0.05 significance level.

Results: ΔE₀₀ results were influenced by the polymer-based CAD-CAM material type, material thickness, and cement shade (P< 0.05) over both abutment shades. VE exhibited lower ΔE₀₀ values than Cs over B1 and C3 shaded abutments (for each abutment P< 0.001). Specimens of 1 mm thickness exhibited significantly higher ΔE₀₀ than the 2 mm or 1.5 mm specimens (P< 0.001), and W cement shade demonstrated higher ΔE₀₀ than T or A2 shades (P< 0.001) over both shaded abutments.

Clinical significance: The final color of the polymer-based CAD-CAM restoration can be improved by the suitable combination of material/material thickness/cement shade to achieve the desired esthetic outcomes within clinically acceptable limits. Regardless of the type of polymer-based CAD-CAM material chosen, at least 1.5 mm restoration thickness with the use of Translucent or A2 cement shade is recommended for masking whitened or darkened shaded abutment teeth in clinical practice.

各种临床因素对陶瓷/玻璃聚合物基CAD-CAM材料最终颜色的影响
目的:评价两种不同的陶瓷/玻璃聚合物基CAD-CAM砌块在有色基面上的材料类型、材料厚度和水泥阴影对最终颜色的影响。方法:将测试块(Vita Enamic-VE和Cerasmart-Cs)切割成三种不同厚度(1,1.5和2mm),并用三种颜色(A2-Universal, W-White, t-半透明)的自粘树脂水泥将其粘接在两种不同颜色(B1和C3)的树脂盘上。另外制备10只标本作为对照(n= 370)。36个亚组模拟不同临床情况(n= 10)。根据CIEΔE 2000色差公式,将最终色差(ΔE 00)记录为材料-水泥-树脂复合材料组件与对照样品在黑色背景上的差值。采用临床感知(0.80)和可接受阈值(1.80)对结果进行评价。数据分析采用Kruskal-Wallis和Mann-Whitney U非参数检验,P< 0.05显著性水平。结果:ΔE 0 0结果受聚合物基CAD-CAM材料类型、材料厚度和水泥阴影的影响(P< 0.05)。VE的ΔE 0值低于Cs在B1和C3阴影基台上的值(每个基台P< 0.001)。1毫米厚度的试件的ΔE 0显著高于2毫米或1.5毫米的试件(P< 0.001),在两个遮荫的基台上,W水泥阴影的ΔE 0明显高于T或A2阴影(P< 0.001)。临床意义:聚合物基CAD-CAM修复体的最终颜色可以通过材料/材料厚度/水泥色度的适当组合来改善,在临床可接受的范围内达到理想的美观效果。无论选择何种类型的聚合物基CAD-CAM材料,在临床实践中,建议使用半透明或A2水泥遮光罩遮盖漂白或深色基牙,修复厚度至少为1.5 mm。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of dentistry
American journal of dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
57
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Dentistry, published by Mosher & Linder, Inc., provides peer-reviewed scientific articles with clinical significance for the general dental practitioner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信