Does Anterior Impaction Affect Radiographic Outcomes of Pilon Fractures?

Q3 Medicine
The Iowa orthopaedic journal Pub Date : 2022-01-01
Trevor R Gulbrandsen, Malynda Wynn, Andrew James Garrone, Robert M Hulick, Clay A Spitler, Brett D Crist
{"title":"Does Anterior Impaction Affect Radiographic Outcomes of Pilon Fractures?","authors":"Trevor R Gulbrandsen,&nbsp;Malynda Wynn,&nbsp;Andrew James Garrone,&nbsp;Robert M Hulick,&nbsp;Clay A Spitler,&nbsp;Brett D Crist","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The outcomes of pilon fractures are multifactorial. Anterior articular impaction requires sagittal plane correction (anterior distal tibia angle (ADTA)) with articular reduction. However, there is a risk of avascular necrosis of the articular fragments and postoperative tibiotalar arthritis. The purpose of this study was to determine if the presence of anterior impaction affects radiographic alignment after definitive fixation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent operative management for pilon fractures at two academic, level 1 trauma centers between September 2005-September 2016. Fractures were categorized as having anterior impaction or no anterior impaction after review of preoperative radiographic and computer tomography imaging. Patient demographics and postoperative time to union was recorded. Quality of reduction was measured using (ADTA) (degrees), lateral distal tibia angle (LDTA) (degrees), and lateral talar station (LTS) (millimeters) from postoperative radiographs. Statistical analysis compared fracture patterns with anterior impaction to those without.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>208 patients met inclusion criteria. 132 fractures (63.4%) were determined to have anterior impaction. Cohorts were similar in demographics and medical comorbidities (p>0.05). Mean ADTA, LTDA, and LTS for the anterior impaction group 83.5°, 89.7°, and 2.4mm versus 84.6°, 89.9°, and 2.0mm in the group without anterior impaction. Cohorts significantly differed in ADTA(p=0.01), but not LDTA(p=0.12) or LTS(p=0.44). No significant differences were found between cohorts with infection (>0.05), nonunion(p=0.76), unplanned reoperation(p=0.56), or amputation(p=0.34).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated no significant differences in the coronal or sagittal plane alignment when comparing definitively fixed pilon fractures with and without anterior impaction. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the longterm clinical impact of failing to restore ADTA. <b>Level of Evidence: III</b>.</p>","PeriodicalId":35582,"journal":{"name":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9769345/pdf/IOJ-2022-030.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Iowa orthopaedic journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The outcomes of pilon fractures are multifactorial. Anterior articular impaction requires sagittal plane correction (anterior distal tibia angle (ADTA)) with articular reduction. However, there is a risk of avascular necrosis of the articular fragments and postoperative tibiotalar arthritis. The purpose of this study was to determine if the presence of anterior impaction affects radiographic alignment after definitive fixation.

Methods: Retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent operative management for pilon fractures at two academic, level 1 trauma centers between September 2005-September 2016. Fractures were categorized as having anterior impaction or no anterior impaction after review of preoperative radiographic and computer tomography imaging. Patient demographics and postoperative time to union was recorded. Quality of reduction was measured using (ADTA) (degrees), lateral distal tibia angle (LDTA) (degrees), and lateral talar station (LTS) (millimeters) from postoperative radiographs. Statistical analysis compared fracture patterns with anterior impaction to those without.

Results: 208 patients met inclusion criteria. 132 fractures (63.4%) were determined to have anterior impaction. Cohorts were similar in demographics and medical comorbidities (p>0.05). Mean ADTA, LTDA, and LTS for the anterior impaction group 83.5°, 89.7°, and 2.4mm versus 84.6°, 89.9°, and 2.0mm in the group without anterior impaction. Cohorts significantly differed in ADTA(p=0.01), but not LDTA(p=0.12) or LTS(p=0.44). No significant differences were found between cohorts with infection (>0.05), nonunion(p=0.76), unplanned reoperation(p=0.56), or amputation(p=0.34).

Conclusion: This study demonstrated no significant differences in the coronal or sagittal plane alignment when comparing definitively fixed pilon fractures with and without anterior impaction. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the longterm clinical impact of failing to restore ADTA. Level of Evidence: III.

Abstract Image

前牙嵌塞影响皮隆骨折的影像学结果吗?
背景:枕部骨折的结局是多因素的。前关节嵌塞需要矢状面矫正(胫骨前远端角(ADTA))和关节复位。然而,存在关节碎片缺血性坏死和术后胫骨关节炎的风险。本研究的目的是确定前牙嵌塞的存在是否会影响最终固定后的影像学对准。方法:回顾性队列研究2005年9月至2016年9月在两家学术一级创伤中心接受手术治疗的枕部骨折患者。在术前x线摄影和计算机断层成像检查后,将骨折分类为有前嵌塞或无前嵌塞。记录患者人口统计数据和术后至愈合的时间。通过术后x线片的ADTA(度)、外侧胫骨远端角(度)和外侧距骨站(LTS)(毫米)测量复位质量。统计学分析比较了有前牙嵌塞和没有前牙嵌塞的骨折类型。结果:208例患者符合纳入标准。132例骨折(63.4%)确定为前牙嵌塞。队列在人口统计学和医学合并症方面相似(p>0.05)。前牙嵌塞组的平均ADTA、LTDA和LTS为83.5°、89.7°和2.4mm,而无前牙嵌塞组为84.6°、89.9°和2.0mm。各组间ADTA差异显著(p=0.01),但LDTA差异显著(p=0.12), LTS差异显著(p=0.44)。感染组(>0.05)、骨不连组(p=0.76)、意外再手术组(p=0.56)和截肢组(p=0.34)之间无显著差异。结论:本研究表明,当比较确定固定的头枕骨折有无前嵌塞时,冠状面或矢状面对齐没有显著差异。需要进一步的研究来评估ADTA恢复失败的长期临床影响。证据水平:III。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Iowa orthopaedic journal
The Iowa orthopaedic journal Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Any original article relevant to orthopaedic surgery, orthopaedic science or the teaching of either will be considered for publication in The Iowa Orthopaedic Journal. Articles will be enthusiastically received from alumni, visitors to the department, members of the Iowa Orthopaedic Society, residents, and friends of The University of Iowa Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation. The journal is published every June.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信